As I understand it, the church forbids priests from absolutely all forms of sexual outlet. Even the most harmless possible sexual release, masturbation, is seen as something that god hates for some reason. So, why not try castration? Sexual desire has real physiological causes that are well understood. It's not like even they believe it's a spiritual affliction any more, there is just too much medical understanding.

And if you could absolutely never have any kind of sexual release, why would you WANT to be tormented by constant desire? Perhaps Catholics will claim there's something noble in having the desire and denying it; that it's a test. But they've got to find some more responsible way to play their little game of temptation and self-denial. Because the rules of this one lead to a child being raped whenever one of them loses his truly pointless battle with his own libido. (or more often to a good wank followed by sobbing and self-flagellation)

Best of all, surgical and chemical castration really work. You really can murder your sex drive by taking the right drugs or snipping the right bit.

I still don't know how to make a ceramic mug but I have a clear idea of what she would look like wanking off a mule... I'm sorry

Well this video loves you Westy. >> ^westy:

lots of potentail for this video , shame who ever did the CGI did an utter shit job, I mean it just looks wank.
Its alike a blody student got hold of it for there first project.

lots of potentail for this video , shame who ever did the CGI did an utter shit job, I mean it just looks wank.

Its alike a blody student got hold of it for there first project.

wank
wank
wank

As an actual student of videogames on humanities, this hit me right in the heart. Good stuff!

Jigsor

>> ^KnivesOut:
Food, wank, self hate, wank, play games, wank, wang again.
Who's been looking at my google calendar?


I'm curious, what is the wang after wanking?

Food, wank, self hate, wank, play games, wank, wang again.

Who's been looking at my google calendar?

But jokes aside, I've had one event burn the realization into me that (airport) security is a people problem, not a technical problem (until we get real AIs with a creativity chip). San Francisco Airport, February 2002. Me a non US citizen, dressed all in black, longish hair and the infamous "ZZZ" on the ticket.

First, standard screening: the security people (mexican) are bitching at their supervisor (thai) in a strange mix of english, spanish and something I didn't get and I got the overall impression that they had to use hands and feet just to be able to communicate in broad terms. The guy giving me a rub-down with the wand didn't notice that the wands battery fell out until I pointed it out to him. He did the wand-to-wrist-watch test and failed to notice the missing beep. Just going through the motions, not really caring about the rest and seemed pretty harassed by just about everything

Second screening at the gate: I put my jacket to one side and my carry-on to the other. While I was more or less enthusastically frisked by another minimum wage security person, another was puzzeling if the math books he found in my carry on were a threat to national security. Here's the kicker: my jacket was pretty much worn out with holes in the pocket so you could reach all the way around inside. Perfect hiding spot of just about anything nasty and would warrant a closer look, right? Except noone even bothered to look at the jacket. Not once.

I can tell you, I felt very safe getting into my seat after boarding.

Ever since then I'm a fully paid up subscriber to Bruce Schneiers message that making people feel secure by doing blatant things with their rights isn't the same as making people secure by actually doing your job. So please, dear politicos and airport owners, pay the security people at the airport more than minimum wage. Give them job satisfaction and an incentive to do their job right. And quit wanking over cool tech stuff you saw in early 90s Schwarzenegger movies that just doesn't work in real life.

First off, let me say that

I tried to give this a chance, but it continues the standard truther shite:
* People who were there heard and felt various bangs and sounds etc. and so therefore it must be bombs. Or... you know, perhaps just complete misquoting, or lying, or misremembering from the person that says it?. Here is his quote to a CNN correspondant:

"I was in the basement, which is the support floor for the maintenance company, and we hear like a big rumble. Not like an impact, like a rumble, like moving furniture in a massive way. And all of sudden we hear another rumble, and a guy comes running, running into our office, and all of skin was off his body. All of the skin."

Here he says that the man was coming from the basement, and yet if you read the transcript of his interview with the CNN person it's clear that the person came from AN ELEVATOR that had COME DOWN... not someone coming from the basement as he says here.

Sorry, but this is the sort of shit that the 'truther' movement hangs off, completely fallible individual statements, that no matter how often they are shown to be false or incorrect, or mis-quoted, they use them as FACT and the TRUTH...

Utterly infuriating bullshit.

I'm not going to downvote, and I think people should see that this is the best that the 'truther' movement can come up with.



Look, I have NO ISSUE with people wanting to get clear information of who was actually responsible for 9/11, as it does indeed seem as it wasn't Osama, and had nothing at all to do with Iraq/Sadam. BUT... to then start wanking on about controlled demolitions, about it being a job done by the US government is UTTERLY insane. Sorry, but just stopping and thinking about the insanity of organising the planes to hit the buildings AND somehow rig them to explode and control their demolition later (in such a way that there are NO explosion sounds) AND somehow make that all secret... it makes no sense.

It makes FAR more sense that it actually WAS a terrorist attack that the US government seized on as a great opportunity to enforce horrendous laws and treat their citizens like criminals and invade a country they wanted to under bogus pretenses... THAT is believable, THAT you can back up with hard facts.

The 'truther' bullshit of it being a US planned attack? Give me a f*cking break.

r these guys all mentally retarded?

its not that remarkable that this would happen especially if your a bunch of guys that practice semi regularly.

i mean its not bad , and u be like oh that was cool , but these guys are all wanking each other off.
of course they could all be supper shit and thats what made it so remarcable to them.

Only one thing to be thankful for considering these increeedible revelations contained in this clip...That we live here and now before the place is turned into the biggest corporate clusterfuck in history.


..one of the reasons why the U.S. feels it needs a re-vamped health care system??...Because the obese and cancerous make shitty wage slaves?

Pleeease get me started on the state of bullshit stacked 80 stories high while folks wank their lives away trying to make political choices to try and make the world a safer place for humans....Please?

what an idiotic comparison , and fucking terrible editing.

some of the informatoin and footage is quite intresting , but it could have been fit into 3 minutes without all the bullshit wank editing.

allso where the fuck was the archer to do a comparison ? why not talk about how the acher is storing the energy in the bow in a difrent way and how that impacts acuracy , or what sorts of energy are stored in the arrow compared to the ball.

fucking terrable program so manny opertunities to do something realy very intresting and educatoinal but they managed to piss on it , it slike sumone watched all the bad stuff in mith busters and made it worse. fucking hate amercan tv so much at times.

I wonder if it would be any good for wanking

With that mindset masturbation is objectification, which it is not. The biological component to any human is undeniable, and more succinctly, unrelenting. A day dream about a purely sexual encounter is not objectification, this is just an interactive version of that notion. You are confusing the temporary indulging of a fantasy with a portrayal of actual views. A man having or indulging in a sexual fantasy about a purely carnal satisfaction with a simulated women is harmless...truly.

She doesn't represent any real women...just look at her and look at the ridicules situation she is placed in. She is the embodiment of casual sexual nature of lust. You are also mistaking interacting with something as glorifying it. The issue of lust and fantasy is a mental state, not a rational outcome of choice. The dude who goes out for a night on the town just to get laid not caring about the women is participating in objectifying a women, because she is real. A person wanking it to girlfriend simulator 4000 is only indulging his male lust, he hurts no one. The former event requires you to not care about a flesh and blood women at all, the later only requires you to be aroused by an simulation of woman...its actually BETTER than real porn in the moralist sense (no REAL people were exposed to any degradation).

You have to separate fantasy from reality and also not make the mistake of over reaching with the implications of someone wanting to see a girl naked, that is just biology, not a rational choice of objectification. There has to be a victim of objectification, where is the victim? Unless your saying male lust IS objectification of ALL women ALWAYS, I can't see where you are going with this.

Tee hee hee! It's Fiddy the Wank Engine!
For more Thomas theme-tune mirth, see: http://www.videosift.com/video/AutoTune-the-Ninja-Terminator