If it was Obama stumped on a question, you would have a long list of excuses why he flubbed: heat exhaustion, campaign exhaustion, global warming, tired from playing golf, Republicans drugged his arugula, racism, racism, hidden racism, the illuminati...

Also, as someone who does not get his "news" from biased a-holes in the libmedia, I'm willing to give the man the benefit of the doubt. Cain is still a success.

The only flaw in Cain is he doesn't seem to know the reach of this corrupt regime's media shills.





>> ^BicycleRepairMan:

What the fuck are you on about? Theres a huge difference in what Obama does in that video, He's struggling to make a point, sure, and he forgets a few words, which is actually pretty rare coming from him, his speeches are pretty flawless, even the ones without teleprompters (BTW, do you even remember that last president?) But basically, he fails to make the point clearly, and he ends up mangling the sentence and loose the point, fair enough
But Cain doesnt trip up words or forget a phrase: He has no clue what to say, or even what his opinion is supposed to be on this topic, this extremely relevant, important topic, and he doesnt know what he himself thinks about it. And apparantly, he cant make up his mind until he knows what Obama thinks, so that he could "think" the opposite, but then he doesnt know what Obama thinks either, so he's fucked.
>> ^quantumushroom:
Don't the last 3.5 years speak for themselves?
If not, there's always this.

Obama without Teleprompter
You were warned, America. Not by the libmedia, of course.
Bonus! Algore at Monticello
CAIN/HYDRANT '12

>> ^Kofi:
Brain process:
Do I agree with Obama about Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
What did he do in Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
What is Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
Who is Obama? Does not compute. Return up one level.
How can I disagree with him without knowing the above? Does not compute. Return up one level.
Adjust jacket. Does not compute. Return up one level.
Say "Niggerhead"

And que QM's response to this video:
"I'd still rather than this guy than Nobama HUSSEIN BinBama. A fire hydrant could do a better job ................ ......... blah blah blah"

>> ^BicycleRepairMan:

What the fuck are you on about? Theres a huge difference in what Obama does in that video, He's struggling to make a point, sure, and he forgets a few words, which is actually pretty rare coming from him, his speeches are pretty flawless, even the ones without teleprompters (BTW, do you even remember that last president?) But basically, he fails to make the point clearly, and he ends up mangling the sentence and loose the point, fair enough
But Cain doesnt trip up words or forget a phrase: He has no clue what to say, or even what his opinion is supposed to be on this topic, this extremely relevant, important topic, and he doesnt know what he himself thinks about it. And apparantly, he cant make up his mind until he knows what Obama thinks, so that he could "think" the opposite, but then he doesnt know what Obama thinks either, so he's fucked.
>> ^quantumushroom:
Don't the last 3.5 years speak for themselves?
If not, there's always this.

Obama without Teleprompter
You were warned, America. Not by the libmedia, of course.
Bonus! Algore at Monticello
CAIN/HYDRANT '12

>> ^Kofi:
Brain process:
Do I agree with Obama about Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
What did he do in Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
What is Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
Who is Obama? Does not compute. Return up one level.
How can I disagree with him without knowing the above? Does not compute. Return up one level.
Adjust jacket. Does not compute. Return up one level.
Say "Niggerhead"

And que QM's response to this video:
"I'd still rather than this guy than Nobama HUSSEIN BinBama. A fire hydrant could do a better job ................ ......... blah blah blah"




Amen.

Don't bother with mushroom though, it's 99% confirmed that he's just trolling for the lolz.

The most painful part of the video is watching him try to buy time as he tries to remember the talking points his minders made him memorize. He knows the key words are Libya and Obama, which slowly leads him to remembering something about an uprising, which leads him to remembering that questioning the opposition was the important talking point. Unfortunately he takes so long trying to remember these little keywords, while mumbling about them, that it becomes apparent for all that is the extent of his knowledge of the subject. That his planned attack on Obama then becomes his failure to get all the facts first is just a whole separate level of insanity.

What the fuck are you on about? Theres a huge difference in what Obama does in that video, He's struggling to make a point, sure, and he forgets a few words, which is actually pretty rare coming from him, his speeches are pretty flawless, even the ones without teleprompters (BTW, do you even remember that last president?) But basically, he fails to make the point clearly, and he ends up mangling the sentence and loose the point, fair enough

But Cain doesnt trip up words or forget a phrase: He has no clue what to say, or even what his opinion is supposed to be on this topic, this extremely relevant, important topic, and he doesnt know what he himself thinks about it. And apparantly, he cant make up his mind until he knows what Obama thinks, so that he could "think" the opposite, but then he doesnt know what Obama thinks either, so he's fucked.
>> ^quantumushroom:

Don't the last 3.5 years speak for themselves?
If not, there's always this.

Obama without Teleprompter
You were warned, America. Not by the libmedia, of course.
Bonus! Algore at Monticello
CAIN/HYDRANT '12

>> ^Kofi:
Brain process:
Do I agree with Obama about Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
What did he do in Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
What is Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
Who is Obama? Does not compute. Return up one level.
How can I disagree with him without knowing the above? Does not compute. Return up one level.
Adjust jacket. Does not compute. Return up one level.
Say "Niggerhead"

And que QM's response to this video:
"I'd still rather than this guy than Nobama HUSSEIN BinBama. A fire hydrant could do a better job ................ ......... blah blah blah"

QM, I tend to disagree with many of your political comments, but I have to say that I think you are right about something. That is: Obama has not lived up to the (gigantic) expectations that people had for him. The "change" that was "hoped" for was not to the extent that was needed/expected.

That said, parties aside, what would you have wanted to see done differently over the last 4ish years? I don't mean who does what. I'm not asking for your favorite candidate or historical president. For a minute I'd like to pretend that that doesn't matter or don't exist, and presidents never have names. I'm just interested in what actions/decisions could have been taken/made that you might have approved of. What could have been done differently to land us in a better place for us both, and Americans in general?

And, again without giving any mention to political stripes, how would you make the world a better place?

>> ^quantumushroom:

Don't the last 3.5 years speak for themselves?
If not, there's always this.

Obama without Teleprompter
You were warned, America. Not by the libmedia, of course.
Bonus! Algore at Monticello
CAIN/HYDRANT '12

>> ^Kofi:
Brain process:
Do I agree with Obama about Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
What did he do in Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
What is Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
Who is Obama? Does not compute. Return up one level.
How can I disagree with him without knowing the above? Does not compute. Return up one level.
Adjust jacket. Does not compute. Return up one level.
Say "Niggerhead"

And que QM's response to this video:
"I'd still rather than this guy than Nobama HUSSEIN BinBama. A fire hydrant could do a better job ................ ......... blah blah blah"

Don't the last 3.5 years speak for themselves?

If not, there's always this.

Obama without Teleprompter

You were warned, America. Not by the libmedia, of course.

Bonus! Algore at Monticello

CAIN/HYDRANT '12



>> ^Kofi:

Brain process:
Do I agree with Obama about Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
What did he do in Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
What is Libya? Does not compute. Return up one level.
Who is Obama? Does not compute. Return up one level.
How can I disagree with him without knowing the above? Does not compute. Return up one level.
Adjust jacket. Does not compute. Return up one level.
Say "Niggerhead"

And que QM's response to this video:
"I'd still rather than this guy than Nobama HUSSEIN BinBama. A fire hydrant could do a better job ................ ......... blah blah blah"

>> ^Deano:

>> ^quantumushroom:
Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. So would Obama's Teleprompter or a fire hydrant.
Left wing voters believe the president is some kind of savior voters must serve and the media must not question, as long he's shuffling around wealth in the name of 'social justice'.
>> ^Phreezdryd:
Next up we see a clip of some Fox folks talking about how Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. I'm thinking right wing voters believe the president is some kind of inspirational figurehead that doesn't need to be all that bright, as long as his heart, and god, are in the right place.


Against that I would say I would not be reassured to hear the U.S President is a guy called Rick.


Hey! That's my name you British #@&%:))!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sngWRpzhcVU

Running the gov't is NOT the same as running a business. Why do you think that being a successful CEO means jack crap? Businesses are for profit; gov't is not. George W. Bush ran the Houston Texans, but was he an effective president? HELL NO!

I don't give a crap about the sexual harassment stuff with Cain. I care about the video above. He clearly does not understand the issues. This has nothing to do with my disagreement with his ideas.

That's the difference between you and I. You define your opponents as teleprompt reading, constitution rewriting, deficit spending, fascist, communist, socialist, marxist scumbags because you disagree with their ideas. You of course conveniently forget about a lot of those tendencies when it's a Republican. Where's your name calling with Reagan running all those deficits under his watch? I disagree with Ron Paul vehemently, but I don't call him any names. I just say he's too rigid in his ideology in my opinion to be an effective President. Cain however would be a bad president, regardless of his ideology because he clearly doesn't understand the issues.

You can call every Democratic president ever elected all the names you want, but FDR was an effective president. Ditto Truman, JFK...


>> ^quantumushroom:

I agree Perry's done, for reasons other than this.
You say, I want to hear more ideas from people who have brains, and can actually solve real world problems.
Thanks for not mentioning the Telepromptesident. Since Cain's ideas are "no threat", how about letting him get a word in edgewise before the leftmedia trots out another lying asshole who's made a litigious career out of being "sexually-harassed"?

>> ^heropsycho:
Dude, seriously?! One guy got tripped up explaining his point. The other guy forgot a crucial key element of his entire policy. When you're talking about completely eliminating an entire federal agency, which is a big deal, you should at least know which one you're talking about. That's just ridiculous.
Perry's done. Let's end the idiot parade and hear from Republicans who can actually remember what their ideas are in more depth, or who aren't completely off their rockers. Perry, Bachmann, Santorum shouldn't even be invited to debates at this point if they're not gonna withdraw from the race. I want to hear more ideas from people who have brains, and can actually solve real world problems.

>> ^quantumushroom:
And this is the guy that got elected. Ah ha ha ha ha ha!
2012.

>> ^quantumushroom:

Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. So would Obama's Teleprompter or a fire hydrant.
Left wing voters believe the president is some kind of savior voters must serve and the media must not question, as long he's shuffling around wealth in the name of 'social justice'.
>> ^Phreezdryd:
Next up we see a clip of some Fox folks talking about how Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. I'm thinking right wing voters believe the president is some kind of inspirational figurehead that doesn't need to be all that bright, as long as his heart, and god, are in the right place.



Against that I would say I would not be reassured to hear the U.S President is a guy called Rick.

>> ^quantumushroom:

Thanks for a civil response. I'm not sure what you're referring to. Do you mean now that Obama has "let the left wing down" with broken promises they don't like him or agree with his policies? Cause everyone was buying this guy's cylindrical brownies back in '08.
Most--not all--of what I disagree with has its source in left-wing politics, and it's not a matter of personal taste. There is ample evidence of what works and what doesn't, and most of neo-liberalism either doesn't work outright or is unsustainable.

>> ^Yogi:
>> ^quantumushroom:
Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. So would Obama's Teleprompter or a fire hydrant.
Left wing voters believe the president is some kind of savior voters must serve and the media must not question, as long he's shuffling around wealth in the name of 'social justice'.
>> ^Phreezdryd:
Next up we see a clip of some Fox folks talking about how Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. I'm thinking right wing voters believe the president is some kind of inspirational figurehead that doesn't need to be all that bright, as long as his heart, and god, are in the right place.


Again you are wrong about the Left Wing...any left wing voters thought he'd be better than McCain. They don't like him or agree with his policies. You continue to attribute the Left Wing to anything you disagree with and that's simply not the case.



This is what I mean QM...neo-liberalism is not "the left." Neo-Liberalism is exactly what OWS and anti-globalization (faulty name) people are protesting and have been. Anyone on the left that thought Obama was going to change much if not anything for the better was kidding themselves and most voted for him while holding their nose. BUT Obama has actually been worse than we thought he could've been.

Thanks for a civil response. I'm not sure what you're referring to. Do you mean now that Obama has "let the left wing down" with broken promises they don't like him or agree with his policies? Cause everyone was buying this guy's cylindrical brownies back in '08.

Most--not all--of what I disagree with has its source in left-wing politics, and it's not a matter of personal taste. There is ample evidence of what works and what doesn't, and most of neo-liberalism either doesn't work outright or is unsustainable.



>> ^Yogi:

>> ^quantumushroom:
Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. So would Obama's Teleprompter or a fire hydrant.
Left wing voters believe the president is some kind of savior voters must serve and the media must not question, as long he's shuffling around wealth in the name of 'social justice'.
>> ^Phreezdryd:
Next up we see a clip of some Fox folks talking about how Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. I'm thinking right wing voters believe the president is some kind of inspirational figurehead that doesn't need to be all that bright, as long as his heart, and god, are in the right place.


Again you are wrong about the Left Wing...any left wing voters thought he'd be better than McCain. They don't like him or agree with his policies. You continue to attribute the Left Wing to anything you disagree with and that's simply not the case.

>> ^quantumushroom:

Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. So would Obama's Teleprompter or a fire hydrant.
Left wing voters believe the president is some kind of savior voters must serve and the media must not question, as long he's shuffling around wealth in the name of 'social justice'.
>> ^Phreezdryd:
Next up we see a clip of some Fox folks talking about how Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. I'm thinking right wing voters believe the president is some kind of inspirational figurehead that doesn't need to be all that bright, as long as his heart, and god, are in the right place.



Again you are wrong about the Left Wing...any left wing voters thought he'd be better than McCain. They don't like him or agree with his policies. You continue to attribute the Left Wing to anything you disagree with and that's simply not the case.

>> ^quantumushroom:

Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. So would Obama's Teleprompter or a fire hydrant.
Left wing voters believe the president is some kind of savior voters must serve and the media must not question, as long he's shuffling around wealth in the name of 'social justice'.
>> ^Phreezdryd:
Next up we see a clip of some Fox folks talking about how Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. I'm thinking right wing voters believe the president is some kind of inspirational figurehead that doesn't need to be all that bright, as long as his heart, and god, are in the right place.



this is pretty much backwards as to what someone on the left believes

but is dead on for the right

we want media that questions, but asks real questions, not questions prepared in advance by the interviewee (ala FOX)

and if the RIGHT hasn't been shuffling money from the poor to the wealthiest, man... I'd like to live in your world

Are you even paying attention? You sound less coherent than siftbot!>> ^quantumushroom:

Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. So would Obama's Teleprompter or a fire hydrant.
Left wing voters believe the president is some kind of savior voters must serve and the media must not question, as long he's shuffling around wealth in the name of 'social justice'.
>> ^Phreezdryd:
Next up we see a clip of some Fox folks talking about how Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. I'm thinking right wing voters believe the president is some kind of inspirational figurehead that doesn't need to be all that bright, as long as his heart, and god, are in the right place.

Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. So would Obama's Teleprompter or a fire hydrant.

Left wing voters believe the president is some kind of savior voters must serve and the media must not question, as long he's shuffling around wealth in the name of 'social justice'.

>> ^Phreezdryd:

Next up we see a clip of some Fox folks talking about how Rick Perry would still make a better president than Obama. I'm thinking right wing voters believe the president is some kind of inspirational figurehead that doesn't need to be all that bright, as long as his heart, and god, are in the right place.

One teleprompter to rule them all!