search results matching tag: sy hersh
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
- 1
Videos (4) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (4) |
- 1
Videos (4) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (4) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
eric3579 (Member Profile)
The deeply conservative (!) "Die Welt" in Germany has two pieces by Sy Hersh, completely debunking the supposed chemical attack by the Syrians at Khan Sheikhoun. It also paints a highly disturbing picture of the decision-making process in both the White House and the Pentagon.
The first one is a rather short conversation that includes all the goodies: the chemical attack in Syria was, once again, not a chemical attack by Syrian forces -- they hit a stash, just like both the Syrians and the Russians claimed at the time.
The piece also details that US forces are keenly aware that it was not a chemical attack, that the response (Tomahawk strike on Syrian airfield) was equally ridiculous and dangerous, and that the bellicose stance of the US vis-a-vis Russia is complete lunacy.
The longer piece by Hersh himself and displays in great details the disconnect between Trump and his military advisers, as well as between the upper echelons of the military and the troops in the region.
Just a snippet about the strike itself:
And the media went along for the ride, for the umpteenth time. Remember Brian Williams fawning about the beauty of the weapons?
At some point, this volatile mixture of warmongering and McCarthyism is going to start WW3, and they'll blame it on the Russians.
I think this quote illustrates the issue quite nicely:
“Did the Syrians plan the attack on Khan Sheikhoun? Absolutely. Do we have intercepts to prove it? Absolutely. Did they plan to use sarin? No. But the president did not say: ‘We have a problem and let’s look into it.’ He wanted to bomb the shit out of Syria.”
eric3579 (Member Profile)
This one's a bit dated (5 weeks), but still good stuff:
http://shout.lbo-talk.org/lbo/RadioArchive/2016/16_12_15.mp3
Mark Ames on "Putin-did-it", starting at around 25:40.
Edit: also, first episode of Intercepted is out, Jeremy Scahill's weekly podcast.
He's got Sy Hersh on this time, and Hersh had a lot to say about "Putin-did-it", including this bit:
"It’s high camp stuff. What does an assessment mean? It’s not a national intelligence estimate. If you had a real estimate, you would have five or six dissents. One time they said 17 agencies all agreed. Oh really? The Coast Guard and the Air Force — they all agreed on it? And it was outrageous and nobody did that story. An assessment is simply an opinion. If they had a fact, they’d give it to you. An assessment is just that. It’s a belief. And they’ve done it many times."
radx (Member Profile)
Sy Hersh's account of the Bin Laden raid is quite a doozy:
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v37/n10/seymour-m-hersh/the-killing-of-osama-bin-laden
Either Sy is full of shit or all the reports about it were Pure-D propaganda -- and I don't know which of these alternatives is more disturbing.
A message for those who want war with Iran
ugh. i was avoiding clicking on this one.
because the title, sure as fuck didn't apply to me.
i just wanted to see what dft said, that made the top comments.
upvote for sy hersh's work. you probably should include his name in tags.
and since you you bring it up, >> ^ajkido:
Isn't QuantumMushroom just a troll? Like choggie? That was my impression...
Why even mention them...
"just" one? no. srsly. he can be more, when he wants to be, and he'll get a chance to again soon.
choggie? no.
why? because it's topical, and it wouldn't be hard to guess his reaction, unless he thought about it a little first.