Your video, Trump Sits Down with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Your video, Stephanopoulos laughing at possibility of President Trump, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

I don't know if this link will open---
This is Donald's reply:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-father-fallen-soldier-ive-made-lot/story?id=41015051

In his first response to a searing charge from bereaved Army father Khizr Khan that he’d “sacrificed nothing” for his country, Donald Trump claimed that he had in fact sacrificed by employing “thousands and thousands of people.” He also suggested that Khan’s wife didn’t speak because she was forbidden to as a Muslim and questioned whether Khan’s words were his own.

“Who wrote that? Did Hillary's script writers write it?” Trump said in an interview with ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos. “I think I've made a lot of sacrifices. I work very, very hard.”

Apparently there's yet another Gruber video. (There could be a Gruber Film Festival!)

("OMG!") Fox gets flack for, you know, exposing Democrats like Pelosi, but it's she who now claims that she doesn't know who Gruber is, despite invoking him many times in the campaigning for the bill's passage.

At least Gruber tells the truth about ACA just being another tax on "the people."

“So basically it's the same thing,” he said. “We just tax the insurance companies, they pass on higher prices that offsets the tax break we get, it ends up being the same thing. It's a very clever, you know, basic exploitation of the lack of economic understanding of the American voter.”

That's the truth also about, "tax the rich," or "tax corporations." Corporations will just pass on the cost to "consumers." Tax anyone always means tax "the people." But the masses of "the American voter," like voters anywhere it seems, or at least the "progressive ones," for whatever reason don't understand that. There is no "free" government service. No "free" education. No "free" housing. Someone will pay for it and more likely than not those at the bottom will pay for it.

EDIT:
There's at least 7 Gruber videos now.

"It’s one thing for Americans to suspect that their President lies to them. It’s quite another to hear a key Obama adviser boast of it." (Videosift pundits disagree, of course.)

From the Washington Post :

"Obama also insisted repeatedly that the individual mandate “is absolutely not a tax increase.” In a 2009 interview with ABC News, George Stephanopoulos pressed him on it no less than five times. He even read Obama the definition of “tax” from Webster’s dictionary. Obama was adamant: “My critics say everything is a tax increase. . . . I absolutely reject that notion.”

"Then, after Obamacare passed, his administration cynically turned around and argued before the Supreme Court that it was in fact a tax. At one point, Justice Samuel Alito asked Obama’s solicitor general, Donald Verrilli, “why do you keep saying tax?,” drawing peals of laughter."

"The reason he called it a tax is because — as Jonathan Gruber now admits — members of the Obama team knew all along that it was a tax. They intentionally deceived Americans about it because if they had called it a tax, Obamacare would never have become law."

* * *

All of these videos, of course, make little difference to the partisan Democrats, not unlike partisan Republicans when they get exposed. But they do make a difference with the "independents" who decide elections: the ones who can vote one way or the other. So the Democrats can expect for this to continue until the next election.

Good things to know: The "anti- commandeering doctrine."
Know the laws of the land.

Everything about that was surreal...

First, before I got the actual video I was "treated" to an ad for stool softener, which came quite close to making me give up before the actual video started.

Then I tried to figure out if Stephanopoulos was actually as naive as he appeared in trying and struggling to give a "real" interview to a satirical "potential candidate", or if he was in on the satire and just good enough at acting to give even Colbert a run for his money. I'm not sure I could have a confident answer to that question even if I watched it a few more times...

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

Colbert is a virtuoso.


I'm sure hes had sex at least one!

sounds similar to

http://www.algenolbiofuels.com/
http://www.technologyreview.com/business/23009/

....

and then, there is this advancement from yet another company
http://www.zymetis.com/
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22307/
...

and, to put it all in perspective, there is this from barely two years ago!
http://www.onethread.org/arise/?p=73

"In a recent article, “The Price of Biofuels“, David Rotman predicts that “significant technological breakthroughs” will be necessary to reach a goal in the United States of producing 35 billion gallons of renewable and alternative fuel by 2030. A professor of chemical engineering and biochemistry at Caltech, Fraces Arnold, says there are formidable barriers to the development of new biofuels:

“The bottom line is that you’re going to have to make fuel cheap. We can all make a little bit of something. But you have to make a lot of it, and you have got to make it cheaply. The problem is so huge that your technology has got to scale up.”

Three major challenges cited in converting biomass to biofuel include:
a.Optimizing yield, quality, and transportation of biomass
b.Improving the process of developing sugars from biomass
c.Creating highly efficient biological pathways to convert sugars into biofuel


Professor Gregory Stephanopoulos of MIT believes that a systems approach will likely be required to solve the multidimensional issues associated with creating an inexpensive biofuel generation process; an anticipated solution is a hybrid procedure that incorporates advances in both chemistry and biology.
-------

Well, I guess they solved those problems pretty quick.

stupid education and science, making our health better by helping us be more compatible with our environment.

understanding how to identify a problem, seeing that there is a solution and then implementing the solution.... what is this country becoming? Comm-rape-ulist ChiRussia? BURY YER GUNS AND YER COMBUSTION ENGINES!! THEY TOOK YER FUEL!!! TUK ER!!! DEMOCRATS ARE RUINING EVERYTHING RABBLE RABBLE

>> ^NetRunner:
George Stephanopoulos seems to be doing quite a good job of restoring his credibility as a journalist.


Not from where I'm sitting... maybe if he lets us in on the proceedings of those secret international Bilderberg meetings he attends... then and only then will he have restored his credibility. He's a sick joke yet many of you don't even realize it. He's no different than Hannity. Here you see him playing his part of the divide and conquer philosophy of the NWO as it relates to the United States. He plays Red.. Hannity plays Blue. it's very simple and quite effective and there's plenty of other kids that love to play the game too.

I believe Karl Rove attends those as well if I recall correctly.

George Stephanopoulos seems to be doing quite a good job of restoring his credibility as a journalist, pressing Rove to directly deny the accusation, and he doesn't.

I love the grin on his face at the end, like he's proud of how he dodged the question.

>> ^MaxWilder:
Weak video. Where's her response? It's probably going to be a dodge, but it should not have cut there.


I don't remember anymore. Here's a link to the first in a series that covers the whole thing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPZJ2t-TvPw

It's worth a watch, and it was a big step in restoring Stephanopoulos' credibility after the smear Obama debate.

{{Stephanopoulos=Perez frikkin' Hilton}}<---Gold

Actually, Sean Hannity literally dictated the William Ayres question to Stephanopoulos. Here's the audio:

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/04/17/steph-hannity-audio/

^ Actually, Sean Hannity literally dictated the William Ayres question to Stephanopoulos. Here's the audio:

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/04/17/steph-hannity-audio/

This video is dead already:

http://www.videosift.com/video/In-Memoriam-George-Stephanopoulos-Career-in-Journalism

Hopefully you can find a replacement soon. Keep up the good work.

Ok, I went to youtube and watched the correct video:
GreatBird, I think Stephanopoulos does notice.. he even cracks a smile at one point. I think that he is letting Hadley a make a fool of himself.