I think we need to call Dupe on this one, sorry.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Drunk-Driver-Sings-Bohemian-Rhapsody-From-Start-To-Finish#comment-1429387

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by Sagemind. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

http://videosift.com/video/Drunk-Driver-Sings-Bohemian-Rhapsody-From-Start-To-Finish

You have been awarded 1 Power Point for fixing the embed code for Dead Pool video Rhapsody in Blue (Fantasia 2000). Thank you for helping maintain VideoSift's reliability.

Whenever I listen to a cover of this song, it makes me want to listen to the original. No matter how good someone may be at covering Bohemian Rhapsody, and this is a good cover, no one does as well as Freddie Mercury

Thanks @mintbbb for digging this guy up for us.

Amazing Solo "Bohemian Rhapsody" Cover:
http://videosift.com/video/Amazing-Solo-Bohemian-Rhapsody-Cover

Frome the above link

Some people were interested in hearing my Bohemian Rhapsody lead vocal track by itself. Here is the lead vocal and double vocal tracks solo'd with all the plugins turned off. There is no processing on this recording with the exception of a master limiter to keep it from peaking. That means no compression, no reverb and no auto-tune. This is basically my voice into an Audio Technica AT-4033 into a DBX 386 into pro tools.

I edited out the large empty spaces for obvious reasons

I agree with both @heropsycho and @Psychologic .

People comfortable with online sharing often refuse to acknowledge the cost of content creation. Since the cost of distribution is now seemingly free, there will always be an incentive to profit off of the costless distribution without being burdened by the cost of content creation. It's always cheaper to copy and sell than it is to create and sell. Therefore attempting to make money off some bits you strung together is a tough road. Someone can always sell those same bits and undercut your costs (barring any costs of overcoming technological or legal barriers to copying like they've been creating). In the long run, the continued status quo will almost certainly decrease the signal to noise ratio of content. Indeed, it already has. Fewer and fewer choose to make costly-to-produce content, and more and more are making lolcats and fart apps.

At the same time the industry refuses to acknowledge that the creation of many forms of content is forever democratized. The cost of recording what I'd consider a high quality album, for example, can now be borne by a dude in his mom's basement. He could even include some distribution and marketing. What service does the record industry really provide at that point? Editorial input? Yup... that's about it. In other words, the old media record industry could at this point be replaced by a handful of trustworthy blogs, and I don't know, something like Rhapsody? I subscribe because it's easier than pirating and managing a music library, I get nearly unlimited music, and I get to feel like I'm supporting artists. If I really like a band I find, I might even go to their show or buy their merchandise. I care about supporting the artists. Not dead tree media companies that were out innovated. If they had any sense they'd focus on their core business which is a reputation for suggesting high quality content. Further, they should focus on building that reputation with listeners, not retailers (something they abandoned long ago). They don't even need to worry about the rights to the content. Without an audience they have no product. They might as well close up shop.

Where I will agree, however, is in the realms where the cost of creating the content is substantially higher, for example big-budget film or video games. Still, I'd argue these industries aren't suffering to the same extent because as has been pointed out people still go to the movies, or game online. That is, they've still created a tiered distribution model that makes it an easier or a substantially better experience to pony up a few bucks to check it out. Even after a run in the theaters you can get napster or hit your local video store (not that anyone does that anymore, again, because they were out innovated).

Strange:

Recent Searches
rape, sugar, csardas, penis cam, Where is Superman, rhapsody in blue, spin, porno films, flash, after hours, Johnson automotive, emile, hotgirls sexy movies nipple boobs celebrities actresses kissing girls pakistani, mario bros, vagina cam, tango, Sixty Symbols, tear jerker, Noam Chomsky, sexual positionsiu

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/William-Shatner-Sings-Bohemian-Rhapsody

4 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.

This video has been declared a duplicate by the original submitter; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by longde.

*dupeof= http://videosift.com/video/William-Shatner-Sings-Bohemian-Rhapsody

Ever so sorry dude but:-

*dupeof= http://videosift.com/video/William-Shatner-Sings-Bohemian-Rhapsody

Cheers for the promote dude

In reply to this comment by Fletch:
He looks like he's being held face down in a toilet.

*promote