>> ^quantumushroom:

You have nothing to worry about, unless you're part of the one-third of the populace paying for the other two-thirds who take more than they give.


Oh, come off it QM.

In 2009 the top 5% of households received 20.7% of National Income.

20.7% of 14.5 TRILLION dollars.

That's more money that the bottom 40% of households earned COMBINED.

3.9% + 9.4% = 13.3% of 14.5 Trillion dollars.

[http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/inequality/f02AR.xls]

~~~
So go ahead, pretend like the Upper Class is being victimized by other lazy selfish citizens too dumb to have been born into wealthy families.

Plus, i mean.. do you even make $250,000+ a year? No? Then WHY THE FUCK are you such a willfully ignorant brown-noser for anything labeled "conservatism"?!

I swear to god you're just some pervy troll who get boners from sadomasochistic politics.

"Yes, Master Plutocracy. May I have another?"
~~~

p.s. - cognitive dissonance. it powers your fuel cells.

whoa. and I thought I was pervy.. =/

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL>> ^gwiz665:

Something's seriously amiss when Japan can make fun of someone else for being too pervy...

Something's seriously amiss when Japan can make fun of someone else for being too pervy...

Cheers for the quality, that video was being criminally overlooked
In reply to this comment by geo321:
*quality

Weren't the 80s in general this creepy and pervy?

This is so laden with sexual energy...

Naughty co-eds dancing on tables
Put your head inside... 'ha ha ha' (Asphyxiation sex)
Pervy teacher explains how to hold his long suction pole.
'Must' be between her legs, Cup the end of it...
Be careful or it will suck onto your body or maybe rip your clothes off.
She'll have to walk around school in semi translucent plastic.
She screams and giggles as it's turned on
Vacuum packed so she looks like shes wrapped naked in cling film



>> ^zeoverlord:

True, also rule 34 still applies

Hey numbnuts, I didn't see the girls underpants...maybe I wasn't looking as hard as you were.

what if he was zooming in on her armpits rather than her crotch (which was covered by two layers of clothing. maybe he has a wicked underarm fetish...still objectionable?

fact is he did zoom for a few moments on her ass, he also spent alot of the video filming her from different angles that wouldnt be considered "pervy" as well as turning around and filming the skyline behind him.

and what about all the people standing by and watching from his general direction reletive to her? are they pervs because they were having a crotch pointed at them? nope...but if you film it, its naughty time.

>> ^residue:

het numbnuts, I'm pretty sure the cameraman isn't zooming in on her fucking underpants. you can't honestly tell me you don't see a difference between the two
>> ^CyberViperDriver:
its this sickening trend in america now where the line was apparently crossed by him using a camera. ((hint, now the police are jumping on the bandwagon, arresting people filming arrests from their own private property))
"He is filming her! HERPA DERP CHILD PRON!"
gimme a fucking break. so assuming he is shady and was going to take the footage back home and masturbate furiously to it...he could do the same with just his memory of the girl...better just burn him at the stake to be sure he isn't getting away with anything pervy.
oh, the dude on the ground taking pictures? we paid him so its cool that he is snapping pictures, but god help him he happens to drop the shutter when she turns the wrong way....oh wait, we wont do anything even then because we are hypocrites.
The ultimate irony would be the pro photographer taking the shots home and masturbating furiously to them.

het numbnuts, I'm pretty sure the cameraman isn't zooming in on her fucking underpants. you can't honestly tell me you don't see a difference between the two

>> ^CyberViperDriver:

its this sickening trend in america now where the line was apparently crossed by him using a camera. ((hint, now the police are jumping on the bandwagon, arresting people filming arrests from their own private property))
"He is filming her! HERPA DERP CHILD PRON!"
gimme a fucking break. so assuming he is shady and was going to take the footage back home and masturbate furiously to it...he could do the same with just his memory of the girl...better just burn him at the stake to be sure he isn't getting away with anything pervy.
oh, the dude on the ground taking pictures? we paid him so its cool that he is snapping pictures, but god help him he happens to drop the shutter when she turns the wrong way....oh wait, we wont do anything even then because we are hypocrites.
The ultimate irony would be the pro photographer taking the shots home and masturbating furiously to them.

its this sickening trend in america now where the line was apparently crossed by him using a camera. ((hint, now the police are jumping on the bandwagon, arresting people filming arrests from their own private property))

"He is filming her! HERPA DERP CHILD PRON!"

gimme a fucking break. so assuming he is shady and was going to take the footage back home and masturbate furiously to it...he could do the same with just his memory of the girl...better just burn him at the stake to be sure he isn't getting away with anything pervy.

oh, the dude on the ground taking pictures? we paid him so its cool that he is snapping pictures, but god help him he happens to drop the shutter when she turns the wrong way....oh wait, we wont do anything even then because we are hypocrites.

The ultimate irony would be the pro photographer taking the shots home and masturbating furiously to them.

>> ^KnivesOut:

I want a t-shirt that says "I See The World In Shades of Perviness"


I have that tattoo.

>> ^KnivesOut:

I want a t-shirt that says "I See The World In Shades of Perviness"


Hehe, your avatar seems to have that going on... quite appropriate.

I want a t-shirt that says "I See The World In Shades of Perviness"

Now now, everyone calm down a second... all these points are NOT mutually exclusive.

The guy could be legally okay in what he is doing.
The guy could also be a douchebag for what he is doing.
The people taking the photos could also be kinda disingenuous for not liking his pervy behavior but excusing their own since they are taking pictures of the exact same subject.
The bystanders are also be crossing the line by getting physical.

All of the points people have made are valid.

It just kinda points to our need to see the world in black and white, good and bad, right and wrong.

Reality isn't like that, it is just shades of perviness evidently.

so ive been reading chuck klostermann books lately, and im not sure why because im not sure that i even like chuck klostermann. chuck klostermann writes what i imagine to be the inner monologue of all men born between 1972 and 1980, and im really unsure whether or not this makes good literature. it probably doesnt.

anyhow, in sex drugs and cocoa puffs he makes an interesting assessment of woody allen and women. he credits woody allen for the success of nerdy dudes. he thinks woody allen is the reason that all women like nerdy dudes.

(i swear this is true, if you think youre a nerdy dude and you dont think girls like you, either they do and you dont know it, or you might actually just be kind of douchey)

apparently, women dont even have to be woody allen fans, or even actually see a woody allen movie, and of course women dont want woody allen because he is kind of pervy, but the success of woody allen movies and the whispers of woody allen in pop culture have left their imprint on society and made the neurotic nerd romantic and iconic. so thanks to woody allen, awkward neurotic slightly annoying dudes in ugly sweaters everywhere have a much better chance with women far out of their league.

in essence, i think what he is saying is that woody allen did for skinny nerds what john cusack did for sensitive hit men with huge record collections relatively whiny dispositions huge boom boxes and at least one peter gabriel cassette tape.