It's weird. I was just reading this on my tablet and the image was a little clearer. But on my new LG monitor it's a hard one to see. That combined with my terrible eyesight doesn't help. I've reached the point where I automatically use Ctrl+ to make text bigger on many pages.

That said, some of the more garish styling, as Chingy says, can really be a test!

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by mintbbb.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by Ornthoron.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by oritteropo.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by oritteropo.

>> ^dag:

Come into the light my children ... all are welcome on iOS

Never! Neveeerrr! You're not my father, it can't be! It's impossible!

But, really, I'm just running something like the original iPhone, when most Androids are now 4Gs's, so it's to be expected when some things won't work on my phone.

Seeing as you can pick one of the phones I have up for under $100 pre-paid (LG Optimus One), they pack a lot of power for such a cheap device.

When my current contract expires I'll be able to update to something which I find stupidly powerful, and still without spending over $30 on my mobile bill

Ah, right, ok. So I just went to the website for it, which linked to the market for it, which showed that it's incompatible with my LG Optimus One

Why?

What can a newsreading app possibly need that my phone doesn't have?

Except if it has been coded using Flex then it'll need an ARM7 CPU, which mine isn't... that's about the only thing I could think of

I guess Pulse will have to do for me.

[edit] OK, it's f*cking region based. It's not available to me because I don't live in the bloody US of A.

God this is really starting to shit me with Google. First Google Music, now this. You're supposed to be a GLOBAL company damnit.

USA is the center of the bloody world

>> ^ReverendTed:

>> ^Powel6016:
These planes are 20+ years old. LOT needs new planes. Flew with LOT several times and its just ridiculous.
Just goes to show you, they don't build 'em like they used to.


The 767 has a far fewer deaths than its older cousin the 737. It isn't apples to apples, because they aren't the same class of plane, but the 737 has well over 3500+ fatalities, where as the 767 has about 500+. Its brother, the Narrow body 757, is over 700+ deaths in its run so far. The 737 is only a decade older, not enough to make up the death per year ratio of the 737. So in this case, thank god they don't make them like they used to. If you notice that in the ten latest crashes include a 737 and a 747. The 767 has had a bad rap ever since EgyptAir Flight 990, but it is a good hull if properly maintained. That being said, the plane in question was delivered to LOT on 15 May 1997, a very new plane in all respects.

While I love my G2x (ROM'd of course. LG screwed the pooch software wise on this phone), I would love the Galaxy Nexus more.

Software wise though, as soon as they release Ice Cream Sandwich, I'm sure xda will have it on a ton of devices.

Hell, I had my G1 running Froyo.

--

Camera wise, until they implement analog zoom, point-and-shoots will always have a distinct advantage.

Also, LG is not demonstrating that new of a technology. Many companies, such as easyweb.fr have been doing projection mapping of many things, including buildings for years. They've even done a number of mobile phone ads on buildings.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by eric3579.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by Boise_Lib.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by Barseps.

I bet the camera here is modified from a phone camera (an LG Revolution or something). My phone camera is 8 MP (HTC Inspire), which isn't shabby. It looks like they have a series of LED lights, a camera-phone camera, and more-than-one optical mouse LED/CMOS points to capture twisting and write the info on the fly instead of relying completely on software to autostitch similar data together.

The predefined depth-of-focus of about a cm and the optical mouse info would be all this has over my phone (which has a light with adjustable brightness next to the camera)... so, I was honestly expecting someone to reply 'yeah, here are some phone apps that can do this with varying degrees of quality'.

>> ^MarineGunrock:

High-resolution scanning? No.>> ^bamdrew:
isn't this something a phone camera should be able to do decently?

High-resolution scanning? No.>> ^bamdrew:

isn't this something a phone camera should be able to do decently?