Okay this is really cool and I think it's awesome.

But someone please correct me if I'm wrong. I think it's really sad that they have to like put a soundtrack and special effects and whatever to sell this thing to our government. I mean....why can't they video tape it and be like "blah blah blah jet propulsion blah blah blah I'm wearing a labcoat". It really makes me feel like everyone in the Defense Department is like "YEAHHH WOOOOOOOOO ROCK OUT LOOK AT THAT THING GO!"

The first clue that you've been lied to is the fact that those whom you take your intellectual cues from insist on 'debate' instead of research. Could a skillful debater convince you that the concept of gravity is a lie? Or that the Earth is flat and orbited by the sun? In science, research is how things are debated. Doesn't it give you any pause that those whom you've put your trust in want to keep this scientific 'debate' outside of the realm of science?

One of your biggest problems is that you seem to believe that you know what you are talking about; that the random hodge-podge of political buzzwords and slogans you've been trained to recite are a legitimate and coherent point of view. Not only do you believe you know what you are talking about, but you also believe you've arrived at these conclusions through a process of thought and reason, rather than just mindlessly lapping up propaganda you've been fed by politicians, corporate think tanks and industrial PR firms.

There is no legitimacy to your arguments on this subject. You are completely, provably ignorant when it comes to climate science. It's a farce that we are even having this conversation. Not all points of view are equally valid. In the debate between 2+2=4 and 2+2=5, only one side is correct. You are squarely in the wrong. I don't say this to hurt your feelings, but rather as a service to enlighten you. Rather than getting angry at me for being honest, why not instead turn your anger upon those who have armored you in ignorance and sent you off to battle ill equipped, or better yet, why not turn your anger inward for your own gullibility and lack of independent thought.

Individual freedom starts in the mind.

>> ^quantumushroom:

I wouldn't accuse anyone else of lacking credibility when my avatar is wearing an Obama campaign button.
My political agenda is individual rights, freedom and property rights, all three hated--in varying degrees--by leftists. That damned Constitution, always in the way of free gifts to the people like Obamacare!
Why are you SHEEP are so quick to surrender the last tattered remnants of your freedom for a few faked graphs and a consensus of concerned-about-grants government scientists? You have no hard evidence to tie global warming to man-made activity, only consensus aka a bunch of labcoats in a room agreeing on something without proof. And I'm not jumping on that merry-go-around again. These proud scientitians refuse to debate so-called deniers. WHY? Instead they announced "All debate is over?" BS. BS. BS.
Global warming Climate change ain't about global warming climate change and never was, it's about socialists trying to seize more power and destroy individual and property rights.
Oh, and posting videos isn't 'borrowing' other people's ideas? Please keep your cute little comments stolen from south park out of my comment box.
Global warming BS serves at least one purpose, you libs get a taste of what it feel like to have your religion insulted.

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
Instead of copying and pasting other peoples ideas, why not try thinking for yourself? If you feel that business shouldn't be hindered for any reason, then say so, but to actually fool yourself into believing that politicians and industry PR agents know more about science than actual scientists is just plain dumb. I've seen other conservatives on this site begin to distance themselves from this brand of ignorance. Why not give it a shot yourself? It would certainly help you to garner more respect and credibility - two categories in which you are sorely lacking.>> ^quantumushroom:
Herp Derp

I wouldn't accuse anyone else of lacking credibility when my avatar is wearing an Obama campaign button.

My political agenda is individual rights, freedom and property rights, all three hated--in varying degrees--by leftists. That damned Constitution, always in the way of free gifts to the people like Obamacare!

Why are you SHEEP are so quick to surrender the last tattered remnants of your freedom for a few faked graphs and a consensus of concerned-about-grants government scientists? You have no hard evidence to tie global warming to man-made activity, only consensus aka a bunch of labcoats in a room agreeing on something without proof. And I'm not jumping on that merry-go-around again. These proud scientitians refuse to debate so-called deniers. WHY? Instead they announced "All debate is over?" BS. BS. BS.

Global warming Climate change ain't about global warming climate change and never was, it's about socialists trying to seize more power and destroy individual and property rights.

Oh, and posting videos isn't 'borrowing' other people's ideas? Please keep your cute little comments stolen from south park out of my comment box.

Global warming BS serves at least one purpose, you libs get a taste of what it feel like to have your religion insulted.


>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

Instead of copying and pasting other peoples ideas, why not try thinking for yourself? If you feel that business shouldn't be hindered for any reason, then say so, but to actually fool yourself into believing that politicians and industry PR agents know more about science than actual scientists is just plain dumb. I've seen other conservatives on this site begin to distance themselves from this brand of ignorance. Why not give it a shot yourself? It would certainly help you to garner more respect and credibility - two categories in which you are sorely lacking.>> ^quantumushroom:
Herp Derp

lol +1 for the non attacking attacker. personally i find atheists twice as tedious as christians. At least christans are getting wound up by their own delusions.

>> ^VoodooV:

Guy really should have attacked the "eyewitness" evidence that one so-called "doctor" gave about the existence of jesus's resurrection.
There are three things I would attack if I were trying to de-bunk Christianity and it wouldn't involve stupid billboards
1. This so-called Christian science. No such thing. People need to be educated (or re-educated) on what science is. I'm not talking about what the people in the labcoats do, I'm talking about the basics of scientific thought. Making observations and performing experiments and peer review and how/why it works and show that Christian science couldn't be further from that.
2. The so-called monopoly Christians have on morality. We hear that all the time, if you're not christian, then obviously you're not moral. There needs to be a concerted effort to show what morality is and isn't and that morality often derives from reason, not faith.
3. Show that Atheists really aren't on the attack like the Christians would like you to believe. Christianity is always pretending that it's being victimized and oppressed and it simply isn't true. That needs to be exposed.
He did a great job not losing his cool during all that.

Guy really should have attacked the "eyewitness" evidence that one so-called "doctor" gave about the existence of jesus's resurrection.

There are three things I would attack if I were trying to de-bunk Christianity and it wouldn't involve stupid billboards

1. This so-called Christian science. No such thing. People need to be educated (or re-educated) on what science is. I'm not talking about what the people in the labcoats do, I'm talking about the basics of scientific thought. Making observations and performing experiments and peer review and how/why it works and show that Christian science couldn't be further from that.

2. The so-called monopoly Christians have on morality. We hear that all the time, if you're not christian, then obviously you're not moral. There needs to be a concerted effort to show what morality is and isn't and that morality often derives from reason, not faith.

3. Show that Atheists really aren't on the attack like the Christians would like you to believe. Christianity is always pretending that it's being victimized and oppressed and it simply isn't true. That needs to be exposed.

He did a great job not losing his cool during all that.

She(Debbie) is clearly doing something wrong, labcoats do not get dirty, they get holes and then magically vanish.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Old spice, Will it blend, labcoat' to 'Old spice, Will it blend, labcoat, man smoke' - edited by Fusionaut

The tie-dye labcoat was telltale enough for me this was a bad idea.

Upvote for the dual tide-dye labcoats.

Typical liberal garbage, the scramble to replace imperfect with incompetence and indifference that can't ever go out of business.

Go down to the DMV and see how concerned and caring those faces behind the counter are. Now put them in labcoats. That's what you want to pay for with over half your income in taxes?

How does attacking Beck demonstrate how Leibowitz' way is the better way? Your fuct anyhow, libs, public opinion is now against this BS.

>> ^ponceleon: I'm not sure commandeering is the right word... what the word for "shitting all over?"


Well, that's the thing. If they were just insulting or discrediting science that wouldn't bother me nearly as much. Instead they're putting on the labcoats, so to speak, and trying to speak from a position of authority that they don't deserve.

>> ^BicycleRepairMan:
>> ^quantumushroom:
Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is a theory (hypothesis). It is an unproven theory. What you do with theories is put them to the test with scientific observations.

Rambling nonsense, in science there is no such term as "unproven theory" A theory is a construct and means to explain the available facts

Correctamundo. Is anyone seeing a distinct "intelligent design" element hovering around this thread?

>> ^quantumushroom:
You (QM) lie on a routine basis.
Yeah, lying with the truth, supported by facts and logic.
You represent all that is filthy, lazy, and ugly in mankind.
But only compared to the socialist utopia dreamed up by frauds, thieves and charlatans. And of the three adjectives above, I'll agree with 'lazy' but that's it.
Thousands of years ago, the shaman stood on a little dirt mound, waved a bone and proclaimed the tribe was in danger of being killed by evil spirits; therefore give the shaman a portion of your harvest and he'll save you.
Thirty years ago, some poindexters in white labcoats stood at a podium with fraudulent computer models, trying to frighten people into believing the world would be destroyed by WARM WEATHER; therefore shut down all progress and give us half your income in taxes and we will save you.
There is no scientific evidence for man-made global warming, only govt-sponsored scientists trying to lick the hand that feeds them (with OUR tax dollars).
When it comes to the man-made global warming religion, I'm an atheist.

And also, when did those scientists start demanding money? They're just providing their opinion on the research they've conducted. If you think they're trying to scam money out of us by making us use cleaner more efficient and safer equipment WHICH THEY INVENTED!!!!!11oneoneone, then please re-read this sentence. Where the fuck is the HARM in using cleaner more efficient and safer equipment?

If they're right, and we change how we live to be cleaner and safer, we win.
If they're wrong, and we change how we live to be cleaner and safer, we didn't lose.

You (QM) lie on a routine basis.

Yeah, lying with the truth, supported by facts and logic.

You represent all that is filthy, lazy, and ugly in mankind.

But only compared to the socialist utopia dreamed up by frauds, thieves and charlatans. And of the three adjectives above, I'll agree with 'lazy' but that's it.

Thousands of years ago, the shaman stood on a little dirt mound, waved a bone and proclaimed the tribe was in danger of being killed by evil spirits; therefore give the shaman a portion of your harvest and he'll save you.

Thirty years ago, some poindexters in white labcoats stood at a podium with fraudulent computer models, trying to frighten people into believing the world would be destroyed by WARM WEATHER; therefore shut down all progress and give us half your income in taxes and we will save you.

There is no scientific evidence for man-made global warming, only govt-sponsored scientists trying to lick the hand that feeds them (with OUR tax dollars).

When it comes to the man-made global warming religion, I'm an atheist.

So a bunch of monkeys in labcoats fused their chromosomes to turn into humans? Suhweeeet