But she's a glittering jewel compared to Joe Biden or Harry Reid.


You'd really prefer to listen to Nancy Pelosi or Janet Napolitano?


wow

Remember that golfer with the big ears elected by the perpetually-fooled in 2008? His lapdog media's been lying about a "recovery" for some time now. 22% unemployment, gas and food through the roof, hyperinflation.

Palin couldn't fk things up any more than the thugs in power now. You may not know it, but the leftmedia knows she can beat His Earness next year, and so the hammering continues...

It's too bad we can't always have a brilliant genius like Joe Biden in high office, or this clown:

"Who are these people????" --supergenius Al Gore at Monticello (Jefferson's home) just before the 1992 inauguration, with news reporters present, pointing to busts of George Washington and Benjamin Franklin (New York Times, January 17, 1993)

Yes, yes. Any school with famous liberals who graduated are now completely invalid as educational institutions. That's how you get around that one. Harvard Law is a crap school. So here are the conservative graduates who also don't have a valid degree according to you:

Chief Justice John Roberts
Former Chief Justice William Rehnquist
Justice Antonin Scalia
George W. Bush
William Bennett
Henry Paulson
Bill Frist
Ted "Series of Tubes" Stevens
Mitt Romney
Alan Keyes
Lou Dobbs
Bill O'Reilly

Man... too bad they must all be idiots... and they clearly don't have a grasp on being "American".

Do you ever stop and think before you say things like that?

You don't get to invalidate someone's academic achievement because you politically disagree with them... Well, you can, but it just makes you look incredibly stupid. There's something horribly wrong with people who look down on someone's intelligence despite graduating from one of the elite colleges in the US because they disagree with them. Ridiculous...

Sarah Palin can really galvanize and lead, eh?

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/07/palin-unfavorable-rating-reaches-new-high/

What, are all polls now liberally biased, too?!

And nice try attempting to make this about how well Obama has done as President. That wasn't the debate. You said Palin is just as smart, if not smarter, than Obama. She's not. Period. You can't even sanely argue that she is. She's of average to above average intelligence overall, but sorely lacks knowledge of the economy, foreign policy, and other crucial topics needed to be a good president. Plain and simple. Your political leanings shouldn't cloud that assessment. There are plenty of right wingers who also can accept Palin just isn't smart, and Obama is.

Bonus: The only person who brought up Al Gore is you. This isn't a liberal vs conservative thing. This is you saying idiotic things flying in the face of simple facts.

>> ^quantumushroom:

Did you seriously just say Obama's intellect is comparable to Palin's?!
Palin has a far better grasp on what it means to be an American than a bitter leftist who sat in a hate-Whitey church for 20-plus years. His Earness is endlessly promoted by His media lackeys, so a fair comparison is not possible.
SERIOUSLY?!?!?!? Look, gaffes aside, Obama graduated from Harvard Law School with a JD magna cum laude. Palin took six years to get a bachelor's degree in communications bouncing around from school to school to get it!
You might have had a point when Harvard wasn't a politically-correct degree mill. Speaking of kollij, we will never see Obama's kollij papers to know his genius even then. Community organizer? Do you even need higher education to become a rabble-rousing 'activist'?
Dude, if the conservative/libertarian ideology concluded the world is flat, would you spout that crap, too?! In fact, your beloved Ron Paul wouldn't tell Obama he's not smart enough to be president.
I don't need any labels to denounce His Earness. I merely observe the results of his incompetence (or genius, for those promoting the one-world illuminati worldview). His results are indefensible by any metric you care to name.
Just ridiculous. I get you don't like Obama, but that doesn't mean you should ignore basic fact. And I'm sorry, but she's simply not smart enough to be president. This has nothing to do with her ideology. Plenty of conservative politicians are out there who have the intellectual capacity to be president, but she's not one of them.
Due to an unfortunate media-created outbreak of Palin Derangement Syndrome, your observation cannot be quantified. Anyone here think Joe Biden is smart enough to operate a doorknob much less be President?
BONUS NO. 2 -- "Who are these people?" -- mid-90s Vice President and supergenius Al Gore, referring to the busts of Jefferson, Washington and Franklin during a tour of Monticello, home of Thomas Jefferson.

Did you seriously just say Obama's intellect is comparable to Palin's?!

Palin has a far better grasp on what it means to be an American than a bitter leftist who sat in a hate-Whitey church for 20-plus years. His Earness is endlessly promoted by His media lackeys, so a fair comparison is not possible.

SERIOUSLY?!?!?!? Look, gaffes aside, Obama graduated from Harvard Law School with a JD magna cum laude. Palin took six years to get a bachelor's degree in communications bouncing around from school to school to get it!

You might have had a point when Harvard wasn't a politically-correct degree mill. Speaking of kollij, we will never see Obama's kollij papers to know his genius even then. Community organizer? Do you even need higher education to become a rabble-rousing 'activist'?

Dude, if the conservative/libertarian ideology concluded the world is flat, would you spout that crap, too?! In fact, your beloved Ron Paul wouldn't tell Obama he's not smart enough to be president.

I don't need any labels to denounce His Earness. I merely observe the results of his incompetence (or genius, for those promoting the one-world illuminati worldview). His results are indefensible by any metric you care to name.

Just ridiculous. I get you don't like Obama, but that doesn't mean you should ignore basic fact. And I'm sorry, but she's simply not smart enough to be president. This has nothing to do with her ideology. Plenty of conservative politicians are out there who have the intellectual capacity to be president, but she's not one of them.

Due to an unfortunate media-created outbreak of Palin Derangement Syndrome, your observation cannot be quantified. Anyone here think Joe Biden is smart enough to operate a doorknob much less be President?

BONUS NO. 2 -- "Who are these people?" -- mid-90s Vice President and supergenius Al Gore, referring to the busts of Jefferson, Washington and Franklin during a tour of Monticello, home of Thomas Jefferson.

Your video, Veep Joe Biden Talking Impeachment, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

@geo321
Why did you downvote it then? Did you think I was in support of his message? My intent was to show what a fucking looney Biden is, not promote his despicable message.

But I see how the description might be somewhat misleading, because I did not put quotation marks around the exerpt I copied from the transcript.

"And I think that it would be -- I would not refer to him as a dictator." ---- those are Joe Biden's words, not mine. I've edited the initial description, added quotation marks and removed a paragraph, just so noone mistakes it for my opinion.

If Sarah Palin married Joe Biden their kids would be Quantumushrooms

Here's their Top 10 Things You May Not Know About the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

BTW, the campaign e-mail I got related to this was addressed as being from Joe Biden, and had the subject line "Another Big Deal".

Nice touch, that.

Your video, Joe Biden on HCR: This is a Big Fucking Deal, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

You know, if Joe Biden has so much on his mind that he didn’t notice the movie, that’s a good sign for a public official.

>> ^quantumushroom:
It's appalling this sincere fellow, who seemingly understands the struggles of the middle class and the dignity of work, has NO CLUE that higher taxes, more onerous regulations and the non-stop economic uncertainty created by his boss are major contributors toward the destruction of jobs.
he talks like a populist but his senate votes were ALWAYS on the side of big business, against the working class. typical lying politician

>> ^quantumushroom:
It's appalling this sincere fellow, who seemingly understands the struggles of the middle class and the dignity of work, has NO CLUE that higher taxes, more onerous regulations and the non-stop economic uncertainty created by his boss are major contributors toward the destruction of jobs.


Ahahahaha, yes, because the economy did SO WELL under the don't tax and spend spend spend Republicans you cheerlead.

>> ^rougy:
>> ^NetRunner:
As for your lament about the two party system being broken, do you really think more parties would help? The likliest "new" parties would start on the extreme right (libertarian/tea party) or to the left of Democrats (green/progressive). Neither would be more likely to compromise, given that their entire existence would have come from their otherwise uncompromising ideological stances.

That's where you're dead wrong.
They would have to compromise more.
They would be forced to compromise precisely because there are more points of view being represented, not in spite of the fact.
The two-party system is the punchline of our already fucked up system of government.


Let's game this out. Say we have a horribly broken health care system. Democrats want a moderate/conservative reform that will mostly re-regulate the existing private system, with a public option. The Greens want single-payer. The Republicans and Libertarians would rather see the country burn than see government create new entitlements or regulations.

On a lark, let's say the partisan breakdown in the Senate is something like 10 Greens, 50 Democrats, 30 Republicans, and 10 Libertarians.

How would things be even the slightest bit more conducive to compromise? The Greens could join the right-wing caucus and defeat the bill, but that could happen now if people like Sanders, Feingold, or Brown jumped ship. We'd still have to find something that pleased them as well as the furthest-right person in the left-wing coalition.

Maybe if the right would only use the filibuster only in extreme cases (say, if we had 50 votes + Joe Biden for single payer), we'd be okay too.

The problem is the filibuster, and Senate rules generally. There used to be a bit of a gentleman's agreement in the Senate that filibusters were only to be used in extreme cases. That's a thing of the past now, and Republicans use it on everything.

Personally, I say we just eliminate the Senate entirely. The House seems a lot more functional (and representative) than the Senate.

I've noticed your comments and exchanges with KnivesOut today on two separate videos. You're free to express your opinion about any topic here, but please keep it civil and refrain from swearing and personal attacks, even if you feel he started it. We're not 6-year-olds here.

In reply to this comment by Rotty:
Once again, now that palin is out of politics (hopefully forever), the dumbest fuck in washington is joe biden.

In reply to this comment by Rotty:
>> ^KnivesOut:
Yes, my comments are predictable to ignorant socialists who get hard-ons over useless glenn beck videos. Why don't you hold that asshole in the white house accountable? Get off your knees.

And it was you who called me a "fuckwit" a while back, so you'd better expect a response.

Signing off...douchebag.

Once again, now that palin is out of politics (hopefully forever), the dumbest fuck in washington is joe biden.