search results matching tag: implosion

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (58)     Sift Talk (3)     Blogs (5)     Comments (81)   

New Testimony: WTC7 Survivor Barry Jennings Account

eric3579 says...

Another comment from the video post regarding the collapse of WT7.
It looks as if the WT7 was heavily damaged before the collapse of the towers.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
BULLSHIT!

WTC7 was heavily damaged by debris from the collapse of the Towers. Also, the fires were NOT almost all out by the time of the collapse. In fact, they'd spread across multiple floors and were increasing. City engineers examined the structure a half-hour before it collapsed and said it was dangerously unstable. In the middle of the biggest rescue operation in New York history, they had the emergency personnel pull out of the area. Finally, seeing endless replays of building implosions on TV doesn't make you an expert on structural engineering any more than seeing the stars every night makes you an expert on astronomy.


written by StukaFox | 6 months 1 week ago | CH | profile reply
▲ 9 ▼ | flag spam (0) | ignore

http://www.videosift.com/video/911-WTC-7-Collapse-Is-it-a-controlled-demolition

Craig Ferguson has Number Six from Battlestar Galactica on

EDD says...

holy holy holy holy holy holy frak! BSG and Craig - my two favorite things on TV COMBINED?

*Error!*

*Overwhelming happiness intoxication levels detected.*

*Brain implosion imminent: ...5..4..3..*

9/11 WTC 7 Collapse: Is it a controlled demolition?

choggie says...

“It looked like a classic controlled demolition, said Mike Taylor of the National Association of Demolitions Contractors in Doylestown, Pa.

“If there’s any good thing about this it’ that the towers tended not to weaken to one side, “said Taylor. “They could have tipped onto the other buildings…”
The collapse of the WTC Towers mirrored the strategy use by demolitions experts. In controlled demolitions, explosives are placed not just on the lowest three floors but on several consecutive floors..the explosions at the higher floors enable the collapse to gain downward momentum as gravity pulls the full weight of unsupported higher floors down into lower floors ion a snowballing effect.
It cascaded down like an implosion” Says Taylor.

-New Scientist, 12 Sept. 2001


Analysis of dust samples
heavy Metals
Murcury
Asbestos
the cocktail was extremely alkaline +/-15)


The government (EPA) assured no health risks-(falsehoods, lies)
The NIST ruled out controlled demo as a possibility and DID NOT INVESTIGAT based on this premise....

7 yrs later, and nobody gives a fiddlers fuck enough to re-open the case and leave it to public scrutiny??? Even if we could, too late to prove anything based on evidence, which has all nut been conveniently destroyed.

People are still dying from the toxins they breathed in that day.

returned to this post to see hwo chime in-
As always, JAPR showing the ass.....

Amateur Video shot on September 11th [raw footage]

choggie says...

“It looked like a classic controlled demolition, said Mike Taylor of the National Association of Demolitions Contractors in Doylestown, Pa.

“If there’s any good thing about this it’ that the towers tended not to weaken to one side, “said Taylor. “They could have tipped onto the other buildings…”
The collapse of the WTC Towers mirrored the strategy use by demolitions experts. In controlled demolitions, explosives are placed not just on the lowest three floors but on several consecutive floors..the explosions at the higher floors enable the collapse to gain downward momentum as gravity pulls the full weight of unsupported higher floors down into lower floors ion a snowballing effect.
It cascaded down like an implosion” Says Taylor.

-New Scientist, 12 Sept. 2001

What really happened to the imploding tank car

Train storage tank implodes.

Train storage tank implodes.

Tank Car Implosion Goodness--(short)

Painting At The Break of Day

maatc says...

>> ^spoco2:
I'm of the opinion that the description is misleading. There's nothing I can find to suggest that this was pure co-incidence...
I would have to say by a) His reaction, and b) The fact that there seems to be zero other point to the piece, that while yes, it is a real controlled implosion, that this piece was indeed shot with full knowledge that it was going to happen.


The coincidence is not the silos imploding. That was intended.
The coincidence is him setting up with the WTC in the background afterwards.

Towers fell 3 Weeks later...

Painting At The Break of Day

spoco2 says...

I'm of the opinion that the description is misleading. There's nothing I can find to suggest that this was pure co-incidence...

I would have to say by a) His reaction, and b) The fact that there seems to be zero other point to the piece, that while yes, it is a real controlled implosion, that this piece was indeed shot with full knowledge that it was going to happen.

9/11 WTC 7 Collapse: Is it a controlled demolition?

lucky760 says...

It's a good thing this video of the WTC7 collapse includes audio. We can clearly identify the series of loud explosions that knock out the primary supports and cause the implosion... Oh, what's that you say? There were no such explosions recorded or heard by people who were there that day? Don't be so stupid. It's just because the government has created secret new silent bombs. (I believe they figured it out after watching an episode of MacGyver.)

This was clearly a controlled demolition by the government. All you people with common sense are so full of shit!!! Don't you understand that Bush wanted to invade Iraq no matter what the cost?! It's indisputable that Al Qaeda hijackers took over the planes and flew them into various places (oh, but not the Pentagon of course; that was a military missile fired from a submarine or satellite or something), but that wouldn't have been enough cause to invade another country. (We also musn't forget that those hijackers were all being trained and financially supported by Bush, of course.)

Instead of counting on the airliner attacks being enough reason to eventually wage war, the Bush administration had fantastic enough insight and just knew that unless a small, unimportant building near the Twin Towers also collapsed, we wouldn't have just cause.

So as soon as Bush took office, he had his secret engineers who work at Area 51 develop new powerful bombs based on alien technology that could be placed inside a building's support columns without anyone able to see them and then later explode without making any sound whatsoever.

Zomg, it's like so totally obvious, you dumb L4m3rz!

9/11 WTC 7 Collapse: Is it a controlled demolition?

dbalsdon says...

"Does the building look, smell,taste,sound,and feel like one that was demolished by implosion?"

Look: maybe
smell + taste: never heard of anyone saying the building smelt/tasted like an implosion.. but, well, whatever way the tower collapsed, both would have the same result... lots of dust...
sound: now this is the one which lets your whole argument down.. do you hear any of the regular explosions you'd hear at a CD??? I sure as hell don't. And neither does anyone else.
Feel: do you mean like gut feeling????

I also don't remember the last time I saw a building burn for a couple of hours before being demolished. Fire and explosives don't really mix that well, and when they do, the explosive normally goes off.

Goofball_jones. You're right. The reason debunker skeep going on though, is out of the hope that soeone who's not convinced yet, might see our posts, and finally see reason.

Fade: No they don't, and no, he was referring to the firefighters. he did clarify that in a later interview, but, then again, I guess according to you, he was prob told by his NWO superiors to say that huh?

9/11 WTC 7 Collapse: Is it a controlled demolition?

TheSofaKing says...

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC%20Part%20IIC%20-%20WTC%207%20Collapse%20Final.pdf

For anyone who hasn't read this please do. If you think it was a controlled implosion, but haven't seen

a) pictures of the damage caused by the first tower collapsing
b) pictures of fires burning unchecked for hours on several floors
c) the layout of the fuel storage system in building 7
d) the design of the cantilever girders that made up the 'transfer system'

then you have missed all of the important facts on this ridiculous topic. Choggie...thinking too much is not a charge I mind accepting, and also not one I would level in your direction.

9/11 WTC 7 Collapse: Is it a controlled demolition?

choggie says...

http://www.videosift.com/video/Ralph-Schoenman-The-Category-of-Terror
You people think too much-Does the building look, smell,taste,sound,and feel like one that was demolished by implosion?.....Yes. Do buildings fall like this of their own accord after having been partially damaged by fire? Oh...this would be the first-
Finally....DOES the official story include the fact that the fucker was taken down by anyone???...wouldn't know, don't read Pulp Fiction....

9/11 WTC 7 Collapse: Is it a controlled demolition?

StukaFox says...

BULLSHIT!

WTC7 was heavily damaged by debris from the collapse of the Towers. Also, the fires were NOT almost all out by the time of the collapse. In fact, they'd spread across multiple floors and were increasing. City engineers examined the structure a half-hour before it collapsed and said it was dangerously unstable. In the middle of the biggest rescue operation in New York history, they had the emergency personnel pull out of the area. Finally, seeing endless replays of building implosions on TV doesn't make you an expert on structural engineering any more than seeing the stars every night makes you an expert on astronomy.



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon