I never said she was, only that it’s likely, and that breaking into a campaign headquarters is, by definition, a political crime. It’s still quite possible she or her campaign put him up to it, intentionally hiring a homeless looking guy so people like you would say exactly what you said (once fed it), or not. Nothing has indicated otherwise. Even homeless guys know campaigns don’t keep cash or jewelry around, nothing to steal there but campaign data, not the stuff homeless people steal.
Either way, it’s a political attack to break into a political headquarters, even if that’s not the intent.

How about wait and see before declaring her innocence based on nothing. Can’t wait for a fact before you post no story pushing a fake innocence. Even if she’s not involved directly in this crime, her rhetoric is responsible for hundreds of credible death threats and other threats and attacks. She may not be guilty of this crime, but she is far from innocent.

Oh, I’m so sorry, only bob is allowed to “push narratives” or make suppositions without having all the facts, or in his case any facts. You have no leg to stand on after years of pushing obviously fake stories that, surprise surprise, all turned out to be totally fake with no evidence on which to base them in the first place. Don’t whine now that someone else jumps to conclusions like you always do.

Know what’s definitely not fake? The violent attack against Pelosi’s elderly husband in an attempt to murder her….I suppose you would say it’s wrong to call that a politically motivated attack too.

You are gullibility incarnate. You still believe covid is a hoax, and just a cold, and a plot by China to destroy the west by infecting itself. You still believe Russia didn’t ever interfere in our elections, and Trump really won the popular vote once. You believe Jan 6 was ANTIFA and BLM not MAGA despite the guilty pleas, and that stealing nuclear secrets and keeping them in public hallways where Chinese spies repeatedly brought recording equipment and roamed freely is a “nothing burger” but Clinton not seeing the murky future is a high crime. Everything you claim to believe is certifiable nonsense, bob. Pretty certain you think long dead Hugo Chaves used Italian space lasers to change votes in dominion voting machines in a shared plot with the Illuminati and the sleestacks (lizard people) to hurt Trump because he was going to expose their pedophile vampire club where they vivisect children for pineal glands. ROTFLMAHS!!

You’re arguing with the mirror, buddy. There’s one anti American, anti democratic, anti fact, delusional cultist here. ROTFLMFAHS!!! You’re so silly.

Whine some more, kiddo. More sour grapes from infantile sore losers. You only insult yourself with these kindergarten insults. Your opinion is less than worthless. You calling me a “Tool” for the left only verifies I’m on the right path, if you had something nice to say, I would re-examine my position immediately. You are such a ridiculous full fledged cultist in a failed cult of personality. Keep screaming into the dark.

You CLEARLY hated Obama because he was black, you liar. Called him a Kenyan (as an insult), a Muslim (as an insult), a thug, and in private much much worse. Lie to yourself, we know the truth, and you are a well known verified racist liar no one trusts to ever tell the truth.

You also CLEARLY have problems with strong women too. Hated Clinton for being a woman in power. Pretend you aren’t sexist, it won’t fool anyone, you are a well known constant liar, who would listen to you complimenting yourself?

You hate Harris for the same reasons. Being black, and being a woman. Her being intelligent, professional, knowledgeable, reasonable, level headed, well spoken, and accomplished only pisses you off, doesn’t it?

I and really totally disagree, but after Trump, leadership skills aren’t a prerequisite, and you have no leg to stand on. That’s it.

We’ve never had a leader with less, worse leadership skills than Trump, who never led anyone who wasn’t willing to follow him literally anywhere. Jim Jones was a better leader, he actually cared about those he misled….Trump doesn’t care one whit about anyone not named Trump, and when the chips are down, only people named Donald John Trump. That’s it.
Her leadership skills are infinitely better than her MIA predecessor, Pence, his were non existent.

Obama led conservatives from depression to a healthy economy. True, they obstructed him for the entire 8 years, but he was leader enough to make serious progress anyway, including growth that eclipsed Trump’s dismal 1% gdp growth per year, and health care for all Americans.

Woefully diminished is still exponentially better than his predecessor, whose cult tried to overthrow the government and make us a dictatorship. I still blame him for Trump, if he had run in 2016, the nation, probably the world, would be in such better shape it would be unrecognizable.
I wanted Butigieg, a super smart, knowledgeable, thoughtful, disciplined, younger president, but Biden kicked Trump’s ass despite multiple massive Republican fraud schemes, so he is a major success. That’s it. Nothing can change that…just like no attempted rewriting of history can make Trump anything but a massive failure on every front.

Go pander your idiotic cultist babbling somewhere else. You only come here to troll, no one ever agrees with you besides your sock puppet accounts, you just enjoy being a nasty liar, trying to trigger libtards with nonsense and prejudice. Here’s the problem, Bob. It doesn’t work when you have no real gripes to complain about and no one cares what you think.

I note you still can’t say who she slept with or how that got her elected….I did explain the top two in Trump’s administration got their positions by sleeping to the top, they had zero leadership skills, zero experience, and zero accomplishments. Harris is overqualified if Trump was only underqualified. He also had no leadership experience or skills. He didn’t run the companies he owned, those he tried to failed miserably, and no one goes to work for Trump twice.

Lots more whining and crying, but not a single fact in your posts, Bob. You seem allergic to fact. I understand, they tear at your fantasy world and, when you’re forced into reality, you must live with the piece of excrement you have become.

I'll only deal with point #1....
When she says "Here is a very small sample of the harassment I deal with for daring to criticize sexism in video games. Keep in mind that all this is in response to my Kickstarter project for a video series called Tropes vs. Women in Video Games (which I have not even made yet)." she is clearly NOT saying the comments she expects are BECAUSE of the kickstarter campaign, she says they are EVEN posted on the kickstarter campaign, because these people want to post their hatred anywhere they think she (and her supporters) might read it, and they completely ignore where they're posting the hatred and threats, even posting them on kickstarter pages that have little or nothing to do with what they whine about.
When she started her kickstarter campaign, yes, she knew full well what type of angry posts would show up if she left comments open, and not surprisingly she was proven to be 100% right. She did not say they were BECAUSE of the kickstarter campaign as you falsely claim.

The fact that Sarkesian haters must consistently make angry, easily proven false claims (or impossible to prove negative claims) about her makes one think they know they have no leg to stand on when denouncing and degrading her, and so they need to make up strawmen to rally against. Because you failed completely on point #1, I didn't read farther, so even if you might have had a valid point to make, it was completely lost in the morass of falsehoods and misrepresentations.

1. Was he filming people's children at a playground? No, he was filming adult public servants in public. Please stop coming up with red herrings that have nothing to do with this situation, it just shows you know you have no leg to stand on with your argument.

2.God damn right I'll protect you if you're attacked for just filming people in a public place. Are you the kind of person who would see someone attacked by a crazed mob and just walk away?! I'm not.
And yes, I'll stand up and support your right to be acting legally and reasonably in a public place, and I'll even put in for your defense fund for a portion of the enormous settlement you'll get from the city.
Now, if you wear a trench coat and nothing else and act like a child molester while you do it, handing out lollypops and asking the kids to accompany you to the men's room, I'll think you're getting attacked for looking/acting like a child molester, not the filming, then you're on your own.

Easier when you have no legs...

I'd just like to point out that the naysayers above me who cast off my criticisms of MW2 multiplayer cite the sort of typical stuff of people who are inexperienced with computers or online gameplay. The sort of people whose only desire is to load up a game (mw2), click play, and be playing. That's completely fine, i'm not insulting you guys by any means, but you are unqualified to say that my (and others) comments are wrong or 'whining'. You guys really haven't experienced online gaming to its fullest.

1. Suggesting that "community made maps" are awful and annoying - do you even realise that games companies pick mappers, artists and designers up FROM THE INTERNET? Many get hired BECAUSE of their community driven work on mods, and maps, and such. There are thousands of custom maps and mods, just as there are thousands of films, games, cars. Some are amazing, some are terrible. That's how it goes. You wouldn't have such diverse and interesting games, with such amazing art and mapping if it weren't for community driven development.

2. Levelling system not suited to dedicated servers - you can't be serious. There are LOADS of games with levelling systems that involve dedicated servers. This is so wrong i can barely begin to..... i'm lost for words - battlefield 2 had it over 5 years ago. What on earth are you talking about?

3. "I no longer have to worry about landing on dedicated servers where all of the game settings are messed with to make the experience absolutely absurd" - In MOST other games, you can search for dedicated servers by specific settings and gameplay, giving you hundreds of results to choose from, which you can then cherry pick and, if you find one you like, you can favourite it and revisit. You CANNOT do this with IW's new system.

NOT having dedicated servers and a server browser is LIMITING your choice, it is LESS choice, and LESS free for you to find what YOU like. Whether that be custom sounds, maps, stats padding servers, or the THOUSANDS of servers for you to choose from that are STRICTLY against that kind of thing and play vanilla style with absolutely no custom map rotations or ANYTHING.

The problem the poster above me has is ignorance and selfishness. Yes i said it. You complain about custom maps which you think suck and therefore you want NO ONE to be able to play on them. Do you realise that when we use a server browser to search for dedicated servers, we are both able to filter out gamestyles we don't like? You can block those servers from appearing in your list, if you took 5 minutes to do so!

I don't like vanilla gamestyles, so i filter them out. I don't complain about it, i don't say you're an idiot for complaining about it.

You don't like modified gamestyles, but you don't filter them out, you join them and bitch about it. You complain, and then call people idiots when they say 'how come we can't play our unique style?'

You really have no leg to stand on here, whatsoever. Our complaints are absolutely sensible. It's like saying that vegetarian meals shouldn't exist because you're not a vegetarian.

"Wahhh, i got a vegetarian meal and it was horrible, i hated it, it ruined my experience." Well don't fucking order vegetarian food then, don't say that they should REMOVE vegetarian food from the menu - it doesn't affect you in the slightest, you can still get your meal just how you like it, but it seems you don't want anyone else to get what they like

Also, seeing as you posted what end up being trivial links that mean nothing, i'd like to post a few meaningful links of my own:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Call-Duty-Modern-Warfare-DVD/dp/B0021AETOU/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=videogames&qid=1259260808&sr=8-3
http://www.amazon.com/Call-Duty-Modern-Warfare-2-Pc/dp/B00269QLJ2/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=videogames&qid=1259260829&sr=8-3

There's a reason the star ratings are so low (and they were lower in the first few weeks after release)

say what you will about everything else, but on this particular point, the bushies have no leg to stand on. can't say i'm much of a fan of olberman though, he makes good points but he's waaaaaaaaaay to dramatic about it. though i suppose these days you almost have to be overly dramatic to get anyone to pay attention. though id hope thats not the case.

>> ^blankfist:
Singing obvious facts can be a great joy. ♫ I have no vagina. My balls have wrinkles. ♪


You forgot the *ching ching* between each sung factoid.

"This just shows that Fox is fair to both sides. Now all you liberals have no leg to stand on."

Um, no. If they had reported on the cronyism when it became apparent 5 years ago, that would mean they were "fair and balanced." Waiting that long shows just the opposite.

This just shows that Fox is fair to both sides. Now all you liberals have no leg to stand on.