Cool vid, good music. The song reminds me of the band Explosions in the Sky. http://www.videosift.com/video/Explosions-In-The-Sky-A-Song-for-Our-Fathers

In reply to this comment by neuralnoise:
hey justin, I thought you´d like to check this out
Godspeed You Black Emperor! vs Donald Duck´s banned cartoon. cheers!

hey justin, I thought you´d like to check this out
Godspeed You Black Emperor! vs Donald Duck´s banned cartoon. cheers!

hey, I see you voted for godspeed before and I´m trying to get this sifted, so have a look, see if you like it. cheers!
Godspeed You Black Emperor! vs Donald Duck´s banned cartoon

hey, ant, there is some sugar here: Godspeed You Black Emperor! vs Donald Duck´s banned cartoon
and, hm, pheromones, yes. cheers!

I´m in whore-training. please help by throwing me a coin here!
Godspeed You Black Emperor! vs Donald Duck´s banned cartoon

hey, I noticed you like GY!BE as well, so have a look at:
Godspeed You Black Emperor! vs Donald Duck´s banned cartoon

"whore alert": votes: I am asking for them. yes. It´s because I love GYBE! or rather, GY!BE.
so, there.
Godspeed You Black Emperor! vs Donald Duck´s banned cartoon

hey Omni.
Sorry for whoring, but in this case I feel justified:
Godspeed You Black Emperor! vs Donald Duck´s banned cartoon

As you are also a fan I feel ok in whoring this: Godspeed You Black Emperor! vs Donald Duck´s banned cartoon

Oh, it will get hairy in the US quite soon....hairy in the sense that most of these folks won't have a clue as to the alternatives to marching in lock-step to whatever they throw at us-

Grains
Gasoline

The very fact that the majority of posters here on the sift tend to foment the ills of man's inhumanity to man, and place in such bold regard subject matter involving racism, political races, sophomoric comedy, homosexual rights, global warming and environment, and similar diversions and distractions, tells me that when the time comes, the "useful idiots", so aptly described by another famous control freak/empire orchestrator, will be ripe for the herding, into their new world agenda of economic, spiritual, and ideological lock-down.

Wake the fuck up meatbots, this experiment is reaching fruition, and you are the commodity to those who work behind the curtain, to control what you do, and who you think you are.

Nibiru.....Godspeed!!

Wow, people saying a game that's practically overloaded with people day in day out all the time is dying, that the concept of achievements suck simply because they exist, and that the game concept of unlocking things, probably as old as a lot of the whiners are, sucks and it's horrible because of it. This thread has it all. These are all clearly valid concerns as each and every one of you has a man in a black mask standing behind you with a glock pressed against the back of your head telling you that if you don't play TF2, first he'll kill you, but it won't stop there oh no, he's going to do after your family, and even your dog, your friends, and all of your teachers in elementary school and then he's going to use some sort of horrible HORRIBLE death ray to blow up the sun and change the tides, the climate will falter and animals and plants will die and in years the face of the planet will have changed, humanity struggling, clinging for its final breath because YOU WOULDN'T PLAY TF2 YOU BASTARD!

Oh, that's not the case? Wait, that would mean you're just complaining about Valve adding new features to increase replay value. No, that wouldn't make sense at all... There's gotta be a guy with a gun. Play on man, and keep that guy and his moon-beam away from the rest of us. Godspeed.

>> ^aidos:
I love these guy more than words can express - who wouldn't with lyrics like "We are trapped in the belly of this horrible machine, and the machine is bleeding to death."


My very absolutely favorite moment on any Godspeed Album. We used to get high and listen to this band all the freaking time.

I see what you're saying, Doc_M, though I disagree with it fundamentally. If the theist and atheist were scientists, then they would apply the scientific method to all their hypotheses, which means (according to wiki) "gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning." You hence make observations and test the hypothesis while collecting data. So, if the first experiment renders 1+2=3 then the empirical data would show 1+2=3. If they don't know the value of the numerical symbols in that equation, then by reason they'd understand those numerical symbols to be representative of the truth based on tested and proven fact. 1+2 will always render 3 as the outcome.

If the theist believes the numerical symbols are 1+1=2, for the sake of this argument, then it is up to them to apply scientific method to prove that hypothesis. If it cannot be proven, it cannot be a theory, right? It remains a hypothesis. Creationism remains a hypothesis because it has not been proven into a theory, whereas Evolution has been properly accepted as theory due to facts and adequate testing. So far, there are no facts that can prove or disprove the existence of a God or truth in the allegories of the New and Old Testaments (aside from historical accuracies of people's existence noted in the books). There are facts, however, that reasonably prove the history of life on Earth to begin 4 billion years ago.

That aside, the term knowledge is speciously ambiguous in this context, because colloquially we accept knowledge as being something familiar to learned fact or truth, but it is not necessarily a fact or truth. It can be quite the opposite. One of the definitions of knowledge is a familiarity with a specific subject. Therefore, if you're familiar with the text of the bible, I guess you would be knowledgeable and therefore you can freely note that as personal knowledge. It's also completely unproved knowledge, and therefore in the eyes of scientific method, wouldn't and shouldn't it be rebuked?

Faith is not fact. Faith is, so far, unproved. To me, this "faith knowledge" is a learning of the scriptures, therefore a learning of belief in a myth, which could be considered the same as someone knowledgeable of Gilgamesh (and I use that as an example of knowledge based on literary comprehension, NOT to compare your beliefs to a fictional story. That's important you understand that.). Therefore, the "logic knowledge" must be the learning of accepted theory, therefore the learning of fact (or reasonably proven and generally accepted fact).

If we cannot prove to theory the numerical values of 1+2=3, then we continue to observe and test and observe and test until we can. If it is proven that 1+1=2 like the bible says, then you will prove faith is fact. To prove the existence of God would be the biggest scientific achievement in the history of the planet. I maintain it cannot be done, though only time will tell. Godspeed, dear scientist.

Always love how ol' feddy simply refuses to communicate to choggie cept' in private, or mentioning across the table to him through comments to other users ABOUT him? I made some valid points here on yer thread, and though I wax cynical and have my opinions as to what is quality programming and what not, esp. with the tired comedic-jab editorials on the Daily Show and Real Time...but-

Why is it, that everyone sides with these writers? They need to STFU, and realize that they are playing in a game with greedier fuckers than them-they are hacks anyhow, and serve the public a load of horse shit regurgitant to feed mindlessly upon- WHY GIVE THEM DICK? They created the shit under contract with the gods, little-g, and they get what they fucking deserve, thank Bob and Godspeed the death of television....!!!

Seems this time the video'll make it
http://www.videosift.com/search?q=godspeed&t=v&c=&u=&s%5B%5D=d&o=&vmin=&vmax=&l=&n=&submit=Search