Rather than run the risk of repeating myself, I'll just link to my previous comment so I don't repeat myself.

>> ^nanrod:

Duh! I was kinda thinking about the reaction when this shows up fully assembled on an X-ray>> ^heathen:
>> ^nanrod:
OK. Who wants to be first to try and board a plane with this in their carry on?

Would be pretty easy, disassembled, just some Lego bricks and elastic bands.



In that case, no chance. These days a picture of a gun on your T-shirt is enough to stop you boarding a flight.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1234193.ece

Congratulations! Your video, Fully Functional Lego Sniper Rifle, has reached the #1 spot in the current Top 15 New Videos listing. This is a very difficult thing to accomplish but you managed to pull it off. For your contribution you have been awarded 2 Power Points.

This achievement has earned you your "Golden One" Level 2 Badge!

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

This achievement has earned you your "Silver Tongue" Level 2 Badge!

Duh! I was kinda thinking about the reaction when this shows up fully assembled on an X-ray>> ^heathen:

>> ^nanrod:
OK. Who wants to be first to try and board a plane with this in their carry on?

Would be pretty easy, disassembled, just some Lego bricks and elastic bands.

Maybe I'm just picky, but to be a FULLY functional sniper rifle, shouldn't the scope work, too?

Cool nonetheless.

Your video, Fully Functional Lego Sniper Rifle, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

>> ^nanrod:

OK. Who wants to be first to try and board a plane with this in their carry on?


Would be pretty easy, disassembled, just some Lego bricks and elastic bands.

@ nock and Volump

To be fair, it's only a prototype.

Only sifted it because I think the collab between Android and Adobe is a good slap in the face to Mr. Jobs.

I also checked out Notion Ink's Adam that Demon mentioned.
It's basically a fully functional model of this thing but covered in waaay more awesomesauce!

=D

>> ^longde:
It's mindboggling to me that people can't see the both these parties in the video are criminals. One is taking property, and the other intentionally injured another.
I think it is sad that property is deemed more important than human life/limb.
You say that the thief deserved it? So, now its ok to take the law into your hands and mete out punishment by any means? You folks sound like minutemen.
Do you want some extra-legal person meting out punishment to you when you break the law (speeding, tax cheating, drug use, jay walking, etc)?


Shrug, in most places if you jay walk and get hit by a car because you didn't look, the guy driving the car isn't automatically guilty because you decided to dart into traffic. If you hadn't ran blindly into traffic, you wouldn't have been hit by the car...cars are dangerous after all.

If you're speeding to such excess that you hit another car because he pulled out in front of you in a blind corner.....the guy pulling out in front of you is not at fault for your recklessness. He set up a situation where you got in an accident, but he's not going to be charged by any sane police officer if you're doing 50 over the speed limit. If you hadn't been speeding you wouldn't have created the situation you got hurt in....speeding is dangerous after all.

If drug use impairs your judgement enough to cause you to get your ass kicked because you decided to pick a fight, in most court rooms unless the guy kicked your ass to extremes and really did a lot of damage......you'd be the guilty party and he'd be safe under self defense. But you couldn't have fought the guy if he weren't there, so it must be his fault. If you hadn't been high you would have thought better of it and not started a fight and got yourself hurt.....fighting is inherently dangerous after all.

The guy stealing the bike has no reasonable case to make against the guy who left the bike there. It's not as if he asked the guy if the bike were safe to ride, or if he had permission to use his property. It's the equivalent of diving into a fenced off pool without knowing there's water in it. There's an implicit "Don't mess with my property" when you park your car, or leave your bike outside a store when you go in. People remove the front wheels off their bikes as a anti-theft measure......does the guy who hops on it without the front wheel get to sue when he besides his face on the curb?


Simply put, the guy stealing the bike had no reasonable cause to think that bike was his or that it was fully functional and safe. He decided to chance it thinking he'd get a free bike out of it and busted his ass in the process. Hell I'd argue he even knew something was up with the bike because he was looking down at it when he first started pedaling, then he stood up to really put the speed on and shortly after he busted his ass. No one forced the guy to ride it or continue on after he had suspicion about it. Now if after he fell on the bike, the dude with the video camera ran out and kicked him in the face....... intentional harm and "extra-legal" punishment might come into play. Guy wouldn't have been hurt if he hadn't taken the bike.

Let's see, if we can call him enough bad names, : Obama the tool, Obama the the implant, Obama the same fucking puppet with a fresh, new look! A fully-functional lackey of the bankers, one of the best fucking actors the bankers, swindlers, and the psychotic inbred have ever had.

If we can also accuse him of cheating: He had contacts with a teleprompter inside. That much is obvious!

Then THAT should fix his ass REALLY good! Take THAT, Obama! Heh! Heh! Heh! THAT will teach you to get all intellectual with us!!

^some of you folks are fully integrated, or else on some really bad drugs, same difference. Obama the tool, Obama the the implant, Obama the same fucking puppet with a fresh, new look! A fully-functional lackey of the bankers who fucked the United States into the hole we are now in.

2012 was like watching a really cool screensaver for 2 hours.

Avatar was like Kevin Kostner came back through time with a fully functioning holo-deck and asked if anyone felt like re-making some random oscar winning movie.

Neither will make you think terribly much, they use rather cliche classic storylines.. but Avatar has far more integrity to it in what it does do. The attention to detail in nearly every shot is amazing, despite being made by Kevin Kostner from the future. I will say 2012 was surprisingly good for an Emmirch flick though. It's up there with his civil war one.. definitely better then Independence Day (though I wasn't a big fan of that one)... not better then Avatar though, not even close.

There's a cute jab at James Cameron in 2012 btw, near the beginning.

Fully functional virtual Delorean
Still very nicely done.

His next project is a Tauntaun with bedroom eyes and fully functioning orifices.