Don’t sell them to 18 year old lunatics on fucking credit. FREE GUNS IN AMERICA. FREE FUCKING GUN. FREE.

I would like to answer some points here....
1.You certainly SEEM to have a problem ignoring his posts, you even responded to them.
2. These 'crimes' have been 'decriminalized' because the police are unable to enforce the laws, decriminalizing nearly everything, at least in practice if not by law.
3. The state doing nothing is what libertarians are all about, so again, in practice this does seem to be the libertarian dream, just not by law.
4. Private security HAS taken over in Oakland. Private security only protects what they're paid to protect, and nothing else usually.
5. To make Oakland 'business friendly' you first need to make if FAR less violent.
6. I can't see ANY regulations being enforced there, what are you talking about with 'over-regulated Oakland'?
7. Oakland is in America, and nearly all of it is 'private property/enterprise' that IS putting up with that. There are no gang shootings (or fewer) at Google and Disney because they are in low crime areas and can afford good private security for themselves, Oakland is a high crime area with little money for security.
8. Wow, you are really stretching there. These things do NOT happen only in public places, most of Oakland is private property and high crime.
9. Where do you get the idea that struggling businesses have the funds to pay for private security? That's simply wrong and insultingly so, as it implies that they have the ability to stop, and a reason to allow the high crime in their area.

10. to the idea that everyone in Oakland should just be armed to reduce crime, is anyone offering the free guns to them? I guarantee you, most hard working upstanding people in Oakland can't afford a gun.

Before someone claims I have no idea of what I speak, my brother lived in East Oakland for a year and I visited often, and we lived in S. Berkley for years, almost on the Oakland border...I do know the Oakland of the 80's and 90's (true, I have no personal knowledge of 2000+ Oakland, but it seems the same).

If you need to defend yourself with an AK-47, because God wont do it, you must have a pretty flimsy impression of what God can and cant do. He's down in Missouri, which is #8 for the most obese state. Can people who weigh 800 lbs properly fire an AK-47?

For EDD, the AK-47 can be semi-automatic or full automatic. I believe its only one item in the gun that seperates the two distict firing modes. An automactic rifle is outlaw'ed in the USA except those grand-fathered in, or under special permit(s).

But this guy is an idiot. So those Mexican drug trafficers can go to him, buy a truck to help transport their meth from Mexico to his backyard of Missouri, and get a free gun to kill Mexican police (since they pose as legit buyers at gun shows all the time for the past decade). And he complains about the grow of drugs in his area. Wonder how long it will take this guy to put 2 & 2 together.

Finally, the US is not a Christian nation. Last I checked, we have something called the 1st Amendement. The Revolutionary War was fought (among other things), to have religious freedom from the King of England. We just didnt like the King's version of Christianity at the time.

I still find the argument that you could even suggest that guns are beneficial ludicrous. Instead of looking at the actual facts they scrutinise the etymology of the 2nd amendment. Penn talks about armed rebellions, and about revolting against government but does he actually give one good reason we would need this in this day and age? No, because it's ridiculous. Not like you could rebel against a plutocratic kleptocracy anyway.

Additionally, anyone who were to propose that guns should be allowed to be carried by citizens in schools and universities, in a developed country outside of the US would be ridiculed. Why is it that gun advocates always ignore the fact that they could be funding security guards in these locales? No doubt, handing them out to some erratic, potentially emotional cornered and irrational youth is a far better solution. Instead they make ludicrous arguments suggesting that just because extending gun laws to allow concealed firearms hasn't enveloped a region in a bloodbath that they are somehow justified. Well yes, not everyone is a vicious murder and mentally unstable person, but some are.

Guns don't deter people from robbing a store, they empower them. Anyone unable to conceptualise the fact that a criminal will inevitably have the upper hand by carrying a gun and pointing it first with free gun ownership and not the other way around is fooling themselves. Any odd criminal who would have previously been hard pressed to acquire a firearm from the black market can just go into a store and buy an AK. Better yet just go to a gun show, I heard they don't require any background checks. There, now you're more than capable of suppressing a number of people of better physical stature than yourself while you clean out the cashier instead of brandishing around a knife.