fap index
14:47-15:03
15:55-17:08

Some of us can fap really fast, does that count?

Her glasses do the same thing. I'm really just sitting here but to her it looks like I'm fapping.

That ending made me laugh. FAP FAP FAP

All this talk of Latinos have gotten me all hot and bothered, so I'll be in my bunk. Work tomorrow too.

Hope you are well. Shlick something fierce, it'll help what ails ya.
In reply to this comment by alien_concept:
I've got something to help you with that too : http://videosift.com/video/Brother-Mack-Explains-His-Person
al-Relationship-With-God
In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
I do like hot latinos.. that Enrique is just a dish.

In reply to this comment by alien_concept:
Well I just thought Brother Mack could cure you of your atheism by coaxing you with hot latinos!
In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
Ah you poor thing. Eat some chocolate.

I don't need no fap-line, I have an american brand dishwasher that takes care of that for me.
In reply to this comment by alien_concept:
Nuffin, I'm just lovesick...never mind. This is for you http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xRhfGrxtz4&feature=relmfu :
In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
Hah, oh shit, what did I do now..? ;
In reply to this comment by alien_concept:
In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
http://gifs
ound.com/?gif=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FleIDA.gif&sound=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DrGKfrgqWcv0&start=20

Thought you might get a kick out of that

Thanks darlin, that was great. This song pretty much fucks me over right now, so very timely of you, haha :

I've got something to help you with that too http://videosift.com/video/Brother-Mack-Explains-His-Personal-Relationship-With-God
In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
I do like hot latinos.. that Enrique is just a dish.

In reply to this comment by alien_concept:
Well I just thought Brother Mack could cure you of your atheism by coaxing you with hot latinos!
In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
Ah you poor thing. Eat some chocolate.

I don't need no fap-line, I have an american brand dishwasher that takes care of that for me.
In reply to this comment by alien_concept:
Nuffin, I'm just lovesick...never mind. This is for you http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xRhfGrxtz4&feature=relmfu :
In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
Hah, oh shit, what did I do now..? ;
In reply to this comment by alien_concept:
In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
http://gifs
ound.com/?gif=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FleIDA.gif&sound=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DrGKfrgqWcv0&start=20

Thought you might get a kick out of that

Thanks darlin, that was great. This song pretty much fucks me over right now, so very timely of you, haha :

Fap test level: Easy

" "Explicit sexual content" is defined on VideoSift as gratuitous nudity of a sexual nature lacking any reasonable artistic and educational merit, implying its sole intent is to cause sexual arousal." -- Da rules.

We're not prudes here, so 4 of those don't count of lack of proper nudity, and Girl in a Toyota is funny and has a story. Britta crosses the line and should also be * discussed. If it had been discussed and approved already, you'd have a point.>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^messenger:
Two aren't precedent because they have substance beyond the sexuality, and the third one is dead. The only focus of this piece is naked hot chicks. The policy is in place to keep single-purpose fap material elsewhere. I mean, is this enjoyable for any other reason?
And there's precedent for this too. There was a video with two or three hot topless women having a snowball fight. It was considered unfit for the Sift. (I searched now but couldn't find it again.) Even actual porn has been accepted, because it was a funny parody. This is nothing but boobs. I like that line to be clear.
They all work for me, but that's neither here nor there.
On the point of "single-purpose fap material"...
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Huh-Title-Just-a-minute
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Girl-in-a-To
yota-Supra-The-full-uncensored-version-in-HD
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Britta-from-Community-goe
s-topless-in-Choke
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Kate-Upton-The-Many-Talents
-of-Kate-Upton
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Hot-Girl-Dancing-Around-in-H
er-Underwear
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/French-game-shows-B
ETTER-than-Japanese-game-shows
I can't call this video enjoyable for any reason but that's also neither here nor there, IMO.
I like the line to be clear as well, but it never is. It depends who submits, who complains, what day it is, which way the wind is blowing, etc. I just can't justifiably call this pornographic; certainly no more so than any of those accepted videos above.

>> ^messenger:

Two aren't precedent because they have substance beyond the sexuality, and the third one is dead. The only focus of this piece is naked hot chicks. The policy is in place to keep single-purpose fap material elsewhere. I mean, is this enjoyable for any other reason?
And there's precedent for this too. There was a video with two or three hot topless women having a snowball fight. It was considered unfit for the Sift. (I searched now but couldn't find it again.) Even actual porn has been accepted, because it was a funny parody. This is nothing but boobs. I like that line to be clear.

They all work for me, but that's neither here nor there.

On the point of "single-purpose fap material"...
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Huh-Title-Just-a-minute
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Girl-in-a-Toyota-Supra-The-full-uncensored-version-in-HD
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Britta-from-Community-goes-topless-in-Choke
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Kate-Upton-The-Many-Talents-of-Kate-Upton
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Hot-Girl-Dancing-Around-in-Her-Underwear
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/French-game-shows-BETTER-than-Japanese-game-shows

I can't call this video enjoyable for any reason but that's also neither here nor there, IMO.

I like the line to be clear as well, but it never is. It depends who submits, who complains, what day it is, which way the wind is blowing, etc. I just can't justifiably call this pornographic; certainly no more so than any of those accepted videos above.

Two aren't precedent because they have substance beyond the sexuality, and the third one is dead. The only focus of this piece is naked hot chicks. The policy is in place to keep single-purpose fap material elsewhere. I mean, is this enjoyable for any other reason?

And there's precedent for this too. There was a video with two or three hot topless women having a snowball fight. It was considered unfit for the Sift. (I searched now but couldn't find it again.) Even actual porn has been accepted, because it was a funny parody. This is nothing but boobs. I like that line to be clear.

*controversy>> ^xxovercastxx:

@messenger
http://videosift.com/video/Skittles-Taste-the-Rainbow
http://videosift.com/video/BANNED-GERMAN-SPRITE-AD-BJ
http://videosift.com/video/Mr-Tree-This-gets-a-10-on-the-weird-O-meter
I think there's precedent for this sort of thing.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by bareboards2.

This video won't ever be used for fap material...ever!


fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap.

But there is nothing else to Olympia than tight asses. Everyone dopes, the medals dont mean shit, the olympic comitee is a bunch of greedy old assholes, the whole event a stupid commercial sell-out ... so lets focus on beautiful bodies. At least i can fap to this.

>> ^charliem:

....never...fapping...again


>> ^gwiz665:

That's one bad fap-burn. I wonder how his penis looked after that...


That's the first place my mind went too, nice to know I'm in good company here.