This video was taken from a Nikon Coolpix 3200 Digital Camera... The clicking sounds in the video is a dead give-away. (Sad that my camera is so crappy I actually know this )

Certainly with 80% of the population having immediate access to digital cameras with good video and audio. Ghosts, aliens, UFOs, and supernatural religions better start putting on a good show. With all the crappy videos of UFOs on YouTube we can be sure there are none visiting at this time. Hopefully killing off these distractions will usher in an age of rationality, but with the TeaBaggers as a reference point I'm guessing not.

>> ^yellowc:

This is a small part of an article about the CellScope:
"through to the maximum 50x magnification, which can show individual white and red blood cells"
I dunno about your digital cameras but none of mine do this. I know this magnification isn't that but a device made with that level of usage probably comes with some advantages.
>> ^cybrbeast:
Awesome animation, but why use the CellScope? The Macro function on any digital camera would function equally well or better for this purpose.



That's exactly it, this video doesn't use anything close to those magnifications, so I don't see the point of using the CellScope. If you've seen any good macro photos you can see that their quality is much better than the stop motion frames used in this video.

This is a small part of an article about the CellScope:

"through to the maximum 50x magnification, which can show individual white and red blood cells"

I dunno about your digital cameras but none of mine do this. I know this magnification isn't that but a device made with that level of usage probably comes with some advantages.
>> ^cybrbeast:

Awesome animation, but why use the CellScope? The Macro function on any digital camera would function equally well or better for this purpose.

By the gods.... that was one of the most moronic pieces of advertising I have ever seen.

Not a single one of the selling points made any sense whatsoever.

You don't want to look at your photos on a computer or print them at home? Take them to any half-decent photo store or big electronic store, where you can have your digital photos printed on photographic paper.

10 dollars instead of hundreds of dollars for a digital camera. Here take 2 cameras even... Then spend several dollars for each roll of film, and several more to have them revealed even if you only want a couple of the photos in there.

Awesome animation, but why use the CellScope? The Macro function on any digital camera would function equally well or better for this purpose.

That or the date is set wrong, like most digital cameras on the planet. The fact that the timezone was never set seems to indicate that.

I'm not saying their evidence is reliable, but just that that doesn't do much to disprove it. But I wouldn't think carrying body armor condemns them, any more than being found in possession of helmets.

Hmm, sounds like a good reason to start working on my DIY camera blocker.

http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/New-Technology-Could-Block-Digital-Cameras.htm

>> ^Farhad2000:

Americans will invent it?
Hahahahah!


Why is that funny?
Some good ones, in chronological order:
Suspension Bridge,Refrigeration,Morse code
Steam Shovel, Vulcanized Rubber, Motorcycle,
Phonograph, Cash Register, Solar Cell,
Photographic Film, Skyscrapers, Radio,
Zipper, Tractor, FINALLY coming to the 20th century...
Air conditioning, Airplane, AC plugs and sockets,
Supermarket, Liquid Fuel Rocket, Frozen Food,
Particle Accelerators, FM, Digital Computer
, Microwave Oven, Transistor,
Mobile Phone, Supersonic Aircraft, Video Games,
Cable TV, CPR, HDD,
Industrial Robots, Videotape, LASER,
Carbon Fiber, Weather Satellites, GPS,
Heart Transplant, Cordless Phones, CDs,
Airbags, Lunar Module, WAN, PCs,
Microprocessors, Floppy Disks, Email,
Digital Cameras, Ethernet, MRI,
BBS, Internet (not WWW), Space Telescope,
DVRs, Composite Aircraft...whew that was fun. Thanks for egging me on, troll, and if you use any of the above, thank an American!

That was awesome. I looked into it, apparently the roof of the car they're traveling in is digital, which I assume is how they get the camera into the car. The whole thing is actually 4 takes spliced together seamlessly. For me it really made the violent part of the scene far more chilling.

The opening scene of The Player (great movie), and the last story in Four Rooms are other good samplings of complex long takes.

There's also a movie called Timecode. The entire movie is done in one take with 4 digital cameras. You watch the entire movie with the screen split into 4 sections. None of the 4 cameras ever cut, and with the dvd you can choose manually which camera you hear audio from, or you can go with the default movie edit for the sound.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Agreed- gotta have the fake wobble to lend authenticity. It's a weird concept.>> ^bamdrew:
just put a digital camera wobble in there and boom, peoplz are phooled

just put a digital camera wobble in there and boom, peoplz are phooled

Wow, wow, wow. This is the most amazing slow motion video I've ever seen. Didn't know cameras could do this yet. This is real bullet time.

From ^schmawy's link:
"Werner employs digital cameras that record up to 1 million frames per second, with effective shutter speeds as fast as 1.5 nano-seconds."

Mythbusters needs to get a pair of these ASAP

Woah wtf, that's crazy, they were using a digital camera and took it to walmart to get printed? Why the hell does anyone have to look at photos getting printed from your memory stick?

I've always been curious to the tech used to make these videos. Computer and/or timer + digital camera + big memory card + big assed battery?