Tags for this video have been changed from 'Star Wars' to 'Star Wars, death star, luke skywalker, darth vader, terrorists, inside job' - edited by kulpims

Your video, George Lucas' Response to Clerks and the Death Star Contract, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 13 Badge!

Ah WTF man, I tore up all my Death Star Inc. shares after I saw that... FUUUUU...

Sure, they didn't fake the moon landing, but they definitely faked the Death Star blowing up!

that death star is awesome.. is it 2d or 3d

Death Star vs X-wings.

Watching this video reminded me that I like to eat bread crust.

>> ^jonny:

dead


Fixed and thanks.

It's been done before: http://videosift.com/video/Death-Star-Over-San-Francisco
Which is dead for some reason, but could be fixed with: http://youtu.be/AfqDVP_0O0c

Oh, and I think the same guy (Mike Horn) did both.

NO. NO. NO. The most astounding fact is that the Death Star is orbiting Saturn at this very moment!! (2:22)

Looks like Lego Model 10221, 475 Euros at Amazon at the moment.

10030 still beats that (regular star destroyer). Also ~3100 parts, but costs 2600 Euros.

Still waiting for the equivalent scale death star model.

>> ^carneval:

How much doya think it cost them to use the Death Star clip?


15000

How much doya think it cost them to use the Death Star clip?

>> ^ponceleon:

I'm curious, what would happen if you shot a few rounds into that giant open target that has to come up when it goes into the air? If it slid back I feel like it would be hard to hit from the ground, but the way that thing pops up, feels like you to shoot into it and probably get material to fall into that intake and cause a crash or explosion.
Or if you are an action hero, lob a grenade against that backboard and just 3-point that fucker out of the air.


Designed by the same person as the Death Star?

Well WTC7 certainly looks like a controlled demo which to my mind calls for a little investigation to at least rule it out. There was no evidence of a planet destroying space-station in the videos I have seen.>> ^shponglefan:

>> ^Fade:
Just because you can't believe something is possible doesn't mean it isn't.
If you think we aren't living in a 'Tom Clancy-esque' world then you are sadly deluded.
I don't care about the conspiracy theories anyway. What I care about is that I am not convinced that wtc7 was brought down by fire. It looks like a controlled demo so why wasn't it investigated as such?

Well, I happen to think it was brought down by the Death Star. So maybe they should investigate that too?
The reason it wasn't investigated as a controlled demo is because the controlled demo theory is what it is: a wacky conspiracy theory based on extremely flimsy evidence and full of giant gaping holes.

>> ^Fade:
Just because you can't believe something is possible doesn't mean it isn't.
If you think we aren't living in a 'Tom Clancy-esque' world then you are sadly deluded.
I don't care about the conspiracy theories anyway. What I care about is that I am not convinced that wtc7 was brought down by fire. It looks like a controlled demo so why wasn't it investigated as such?


Well, I happen to think it was brought down by the Death Star. So maybe they should investigate that too?

The reason it wasn't investigated as a controlled demo is because the controlled demo theory is what it is: a wacky conspiracy theory based on extremely flimsy evidence and full of giant gaping holes.