No, the one he was suctioning wasn't breathing for almost the whole duration of the video. At the very end, he gets it breathing. Action packed.

>> ^Porksandwich:

Is the one he's suctioning breathing? It doesn't seem very lively like the others all the way to the end.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Puppy Feeding Frenzy dogs Boxer pets animals cute dog pet puppies puppy nursing' to 'Puppy, Feeding, Frenzy, dogs, Boxer, pets, animals, cute, dog, pet, puppies, puppy, nursing' - edited by luxury_pie

LulzSec posted this on their FB page, via Exarimus Salutem apparently, hold onto your shirts.

Money Received from Pipa Sponsors:

Sen. Charles Schumer [D, NY] $864,265
Sen. Harry Reid [D, NV] $665,420
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand [D, NY] $556,525
Sen. Barbara Boxer [D, CA] $544,424
Sen. Patrick Leahy [D, VT] $416,250 (head sponsor of pipa)
Sen. Michael Bennet [D, CO] $347,406
Sen. Roy Blunt [R, MO] $341,700
Sen. Robert Portman [R, OH] $337,525
Sen. Richard Burr [R, NC] $275,950
Sen. Patty Murray [D, WA] $272,750

Money Received from Sopa Sponsors:

Sen. Harry Reid [D, NV] $3,502,624
Sen. Charles Schumer [D, NY] $2,648,770
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand [D, NY] $2,080,651
Sen. Barbara Boxer [D, CA] $1,431,843
Sen. Scott Brown [R, MA] $1,364,872
Sen. Robert Portman [R, OH] $1,363,009
Sen. Patrick Toomey [R, PA] $1,291,744
Sen. Michael Bennet [D, CO] $1,019,172
Sen. Mark Kirk [R, IL] $911,296
Sen. Patrick Leahy [D, VT] $905,310

@quantumushroom you missed the point as usual, this vid is about the acknowledgement that corporations want to oversee what the Govt. does - see above for specimen 1A.

Hey, buddy. I don't know whether you'll be checking your profile much now that you've been sent on the CircleLine cruise, but I wanted to tell you that I for one am rather disgusted by the way this played out. I'm a dyed-in-the-wool Northeast Irish-Catholic (now non-superstitious) liberal, and I don't give a flying fick about your politics.

You've been a QUALITY submitter & commenter here, and were probably one of the main reasons I came out of lurkdom and became a Sifter. When I saw your banination, I spent about two hours reading comments and looking at your submissions to try to rationalize your dismissal, but there just wasn't enough. I may be only a GoldStar, but I've been here longer than I'd like to recount. In all my days, I've seen few Sifters as committed to the QUALITY this site intends to promote. I suppose there is much to your banination that I'm not privy to, and I'm very sorry for that. Even though it seems you have trolled quite a few members in the recent past, I think this decision should have been opened to investigation and consultation with the community at large.

Over the last years, we've had a disappointing diaspora of QUALITY members, but yet you stuck around. As the years have progressed, the QUALITY of submitters and high-level, long-term members has dwindled. I came here for people like you, like @Farhad2000, like @eric3579, @djsunkid, @mlx, @silvercord, @dystopianfuturetoday, @NetRunner, @kronosposeidon, @dag, @MarineGunrock and even like Choggie. You are among these names.

A (seemingly) long time ago, this site celebrated its diversity of both style and opinion. We've banned, and supported the banination of conservative trolls in the last few years, but only because of EXCESSIVE violations (eg. CaptainPlanet, and (to his unfortunate discredit) Choggie; this is NOT an exhaustive list). I've watched the progression, and while I agree with the socio-political principles of those in support of the exclusions, I cannot but think how the actual QUALITY of the site has suffered.

This was a place I came to enlighten myself, with submissions like this, this, this, this, this, this, and this (which is truly just a smattering of the QUALITY you've brought here). I used to hit the VideoSift link and expect to see submissions that I wouldn't have seen elsewhere. Unique submissions, with a higher intellectual quotient than the rest of the horse-apple internet digest sites. But now it's a site nearly indistinguishable from this one, and this one, or this one. Certainly (and obviously) I like and frequent those sites, but this is VideoSift, and I have always expected more bang for my buck.

I'm sure you've realized by this point that this comment is not just for you to read, as it both is public, and draws the attention of many other QUALITY members of the community. But I assure you that whatever the reaction, I want you particularly to know that you've affected my understanding of the world-at-large in a most positive way over the last four years. It was a privilege to have had your influence, and I will miss it.

>> ^bareboards2:

Flower is outly and proudly gay, man.
Would you like to try again?

>> ^ReverendTed:
>> ^FlowersInHisHair:
I wish there were something so simple that would make me so happy.
That's so sad, man. Not even boobs?



Most of my gay friends wouldn't be upset at boobs, even the male ones

Congratulations! Your video, Boxer excited to go for a walk, has reached the #1 spot in the current Top 15 New Videos listing. This is a very difficult thing to accomplish but you managed to pull it off. For your contribution you have been awarded 2 Power Points.

This achievement has earned you your "Golden One" Level 3 Badge!

>> ^FlowersInHisHair:

As @bareboards2 has noted, I have little to no experience with boobs. But even I know that getting access to them is not "simple", even if they did make me happy!


... not the good ones anyway...

>> ^ReverendTed:

>> ^bareboards2:
Flower is outly and proudly gay, man.
Would you like to try again?I wondered, thus the less-emphatic alternative to "Boobs, duh!"

In that case I'm going to have to go with "Things George Takei Says".

As @bareboards2 has noted, I have little to no experience with boobs. But even I know that getting access to them is not "simple", even if they did make me happy!

Boxer, the best dog breed. Bar none.

My family has had a boxer in the house since I was a child and I've since felt a house without a boxer in it just isn't complete.

Somehow boxers get categorized as a 'vicious breed' alongside rotties, etc. But they are the happiest, kindest, most loving dogs you could ever own. They are as gentle with children as their own pups and as fun to be around as anything else in this world.

>> ^bareboards2:
Flower is outly and proudly gay, man.
Would you like to try again?I wondered, thus the less-emphatic alternative to "Boobs, duh!"



In that case I'm going to have to go with "Things George Takei Says".

Flower is outly and proudly gay, man.

Would you like to try again?



>> ^ReverendTed:

>> ^FlowersInHisHair:
I wish there were something so simple that would make me so happy.
That's so sad, man. Not even boobs?

>> ^FlowersInHisHair:

I wish there were something so simple that would make me so happy.
That's so sad, man. Not even boobs?

Your video, Boxer excited to go for a walk, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

>> ^budzos:

"For those who say that wrestling is fake."
But, wrestling IS fake. Why does every wrestling fan argue a straw man against this point? We're not saying "wrestling is a figment of your imagination" you [name-calling is bad]. We're saying there's about as much point to watching wrestling as there is to watching little boys playfight in the front yard. Except I'm pretty sure watching my two nephews tussle is less brain damaging.
Listen, wrestling fans: We REALIZE they're actually jumping around and stuff. We're not accusing all wrestlers of being robots, or holograms. We mean the FIGHT IS FAKE. We realize it might hurt to do some of those moves. Those FAKE moves.


No you see what most wrestling fans are arguing is the use of the term "Fake". It is incorrect, a more correct term would be "Scripted" because that's exactly what it is. Wrestlers have the injury reports to prove it, it's simply like ballet or a play with fighting in it. I mean you don't look at Shakespeare or Cirque du Soleil and say "FAKE!!!" because it's not...they're actually hitting themselves. Only occasionally do they miss...and then it's a gif and everyone says "FAKE!" when that's not correct...it would be like saying when a boxer misses he's faking it.