I don't know about that for Supergirl. It reminds me of cheesy Smallville. I like the darker series of Arrow, Netflix's Daredevil, etc.

Much more fun The Flash feel, rather than The Arrow; which is a good thing.

We know it's powerful enough to penetrate, fur &/or mail + a thick gambeson/doublet as most of the Nights watch wear (reference, any scene where she shoots a battle dressed crow such as end of season 4). Even allowing for heavy shafts and piercing tips that's still some serious power.

Well beyond your average 20-40lb target & small game hunting type bows. Even if it was primarily a hunting bow, the wildings frequently hunt big game like Elks so it makes sense that it'd be a relatively heavy draw.

Besides even if it was a relatively light warbow (60-80lbs or so lets say), that's still hardcore to the extreme to hold at full draw for more than a few seconds and not loose ones composure (my aim would probably start shaking after 3-4, my body after 10-20 tops).

(and I think 80-120lbs is probably more likely anyway)

Besides this all misses the real point underlying i.e. no one trained with a bow would be silly enough to waste so much energy holding at full draw. Half maybe, or just taking up the slack.

Doubly silly given John has no ranged weapon of his own here and she could probably draw and loose 2 or 3 arrows before he closed the distance if he tried.

Goes on my list of pet gripes with GOT alongside Daenerys "firing" catapults and the occasional sword "schwing" sound. (not that I don't love the show)

A New Level Of Archery Skills has been added as a related post - related requested by kulpims.

Lars Andersen shoots arrows the fastest has been added as a related post - related requested by kulpims.

A Response to Lars Andersen: a New Level of Archery has been added as a related post - related requested by kulpims.

*related=http://videosift.com/video/A-New-Level-Of-Amazing-Archery-Skills *related=http://videosift.com/video/Lars-Andersen-shoots-arrows-the-fastest *related=http://videosift.com/video/A-Response-to-Lars-Andersen-a-New-Level-of-Archery

*related=http://videosift.com/video/A-New-Level-Of-Amazing-Archery-Skills *related=http://videosift.com/video/Lars-Andersen-shoots-arrows-the-fastest *related=http://videosift.com/video/A-Response-to-Lars-Andersen-a-New-Level-of-Archery

Lars Andersen shoots arrows the fastest has been added as a related post - related requested by kulpims.

*related=http://videosift.com/video/Lars-Andersen-shoots-arrows-the-fastest

1). So the answer is, YES, it is "failing" to indicate page numbers.
Clicking the arrow works, but it is supposed to indicate page numbers.
Example.: on the "Newest Video" page. there are page numbers.
on the "upcoming videos" page - no page numbers.

2). sure okay - It seems to be working now, as you say. I may have been mistaking individual pages with the featured video page which shows the video on the old format. It's distracting jumping back and forth. but I see what you are saying.

3). just doesn't work for me. (as I commented above.)

Thanks for your help though. They may be very little things, but as the SIFT grows and becomes more complex, inconsistencies become more noticeable.
Sift-on...

Is there a defect with the mechanism?
-No there is not

1). The Sift IS failing to indicate additional pages, I've noticed this quite a bit lately.
-No thats not true. It does but the last page is not a page number but an arrow thingy.

2). I've also noticed that the sift pages can't decide if they want to use the new format or the old one. I seem to get them both randomly on each page - no pattern that I've noticed. This tends to confuse how we are seeing things.
-NO, it works as intended. New format when viewing individual videos. All other pages old style. Also you can opt out of new format if you would like(bottom of the page)

3). The information that used to be at the bottom of the page, which indicated who has up-voted or down-voted is missing. We can no longer tell who has voted in which direction.
-Newt answered above.

Seems to be about right, minus some detalis...except...

3) if you hover over the vote number, who voted and which way pops up for you now. It's a bit hidden, but it's there.

I had no idea that the additional pages were not loading for some people, they always do for me. I'm glad you've told Lucky.
EDIT: I do only see an arrow for the last page, not a number, which is odd but works.

The very moment that I let my arrow fly, I had been prepared for this outcome.

you guys are hilarious. That's now the thumbnail it started with, and another user decided it needed to be changed. I obliged them because I agreed, and now you change it back because....?
I don't really care either way...I just got a chuckle out of the 'it should have this thumb...no it should have this thumb...no it should have the first thumb' back and forth.
EDIT: I gotta say, this thumbnail is not going to get any views...it's not good, and the one with her holding the arrow wasn't much better. Both are bland. I liked the one that was made for it that's now gone.

Agreed that the channels need to be present.

Also, the placement of the vote total with the upvote and downvote arrows are placed so far at the bottom of the page (at least on Firefox) I either need to scroll down to access it to vote or I have to be very accurate with my cursor.

Adjusting that up off the "bottom" of the page (without having to scroll) would be nice to have access to. Otherwise, I could imagine videos not getting voted for at all. Which would not be good needless to say.

Despite that measures of time may not be so analytically robust, there are reasonably good relative measures. Throw a stone into the air or drop it from a fixed height, and see how many arrows you can shoot before it hits the ground. Even if it were as long as 3 seconds, that's still an impressively short time to shoot 3 arrows in.