This post seems shady to me.
Hijacked content which leads to a Youtube page offering a free download of the movie - (A link I wouldn't touch in a million years)

The Youtube video was posted and then minutes later it's posted here on the Sift by someone who just made their account and has never watched or commented or posted before.

From Youtube:
Published on Sep 23, 2014
Download the full movie from the link below and enjoy it!
http://downloadconfirm.net/file/0xD68X (*Link edited to be inoperable)

I'm going to Suggest a *Ban for possible Self Post.
Anyone who wants to second this ban can do so.

@davidon We welcome new members to the Sift, but it seems you are Spamming. If you feel unjustly accused, let us know. Thanks

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Israel, evil, racism, violence, unjust' to 'Israel, evil, racism, violence, unjust, tyt, young turks, cenk uygur' - edited by messenger

Yes, Evil because they killed innocent children playing, racism because Israel is a racist apartheid state, and unjust because 200 Gaza are dead and only 1 Israeli. GET IT ?! I should also add COWARDS.

Yes. I did share a link yesterday for THE solution...
Israel needs to get the fuck out of OCCUPIED TERRITORY.
http://videosift.com/video/What-is-Israel-to-Do-answer-get-out-of-occupied-territory
And yes, please do think about the innocent children being murdered on your behalf.
You can look forward to A LOT more videos like this...
BTW your channel is full of the dumbest moronic bullshit media I have ever seen.

'evil' 'racism' 'unjust'

"Welcome to the ongoing beef in Middle Earth East between throwbacks and assholes. Your opinion matters oh ye ineffectual white-people and please, share your consternation and ideas for solutions by placing your power to change it in this drop-box. Suggestions will be noted and your life of wage-slavery and World Police peace and security will continue unabated."

Thank You For Your Concern and Please, Think About The Children

If your account has been banned, this was most likely done for a reason. You can look up possible reasons here:

http://videosift.com/faq#posting_guidelines

If you still believe that your account has been wrongfully banned after reading the posting guidelines, you can appeal the banination by contacting the administrators.

(Edit: Btw, I only see one person unjustly attempting to ban other users' or even admins' accounts, @ask4entmedia/@Phil1/@tommirror)

I'd also add once again here that all this power-stripping..the warnings and promises from admins in an attempt to keep me on a short leash as not to offend the damaged sensibilities of those who simply have a hard-on to see me burn is nothing more than a window into some unchecked personality disorders.

I don't mind so much being the whipping-boy for such nonsense since I do court confrontation when attacked unjustly by the timid and confused but the dicklessness from some of the most egregious of offenders (ignore button, my ass)?? The passive-aggression from those who fear change or love the smell of their own fucking farts and want everyone else to stand in line for a sniff??? Fuck that shit.

By assuming we are "close minded conspiracy theorists" simply off the basis of having a different conclusion than you, you're simply avoiding the discussion, and you still fail to make any legitimate arguments; you merely repeat the "tired and naive" talking point of how "it's not the best, but it's the best we have" to defend an unjust system.

When has that attitude ever done us good? We have such amazing technology and understanding of the universe because of the way we as a whole ultimately reject that argument and instead say "some of this works quite well, but we need a lot of work in other areas."

Personally, I'm a fan of the free market concept. I think a fair amount of those who you are so eager to write off as fools also do. The problem comes down to what our concepts of justice are. We speak fondly of "equality of opportunity," but anyone can see we have no such thing. Only when everyone has equal opportunity to pursue learning in the fields of their choice without having to give up on adding to our collective culture/knowledge because of the economic pressure of survival can we truly say people are free. So long as anyone is taking a job they hate just to scrape by at the bottom of the chain, and we exercise violence against each other to try and force our ways onto others on a massive scale, we are, in my opinion, a profoundly unjust society.

Of course, violence will never end, scheming and exploitation and all our evils will continue to plague us. We can't make a utopia. What we can do, though, is decrease the potential for abuse in our current systems. I, and many others, think that separating the means of survival and self-actualization - the things required to develop, grow, and contribute to humanity at a high level (namely, food/water/shelter, basic healthcare, and free, equal access to education) - from the rest of the market is one way to make a huge impact on that potential for abuse. Think about it: how many times do we let corporations damage our environment and abuse us simply because speaking out means losing your means of survival?

I think the rest of the market is going to have to stay the market, nobody can really say how it's fair to divide up all our resources (though I hope for an increase in democracy going forwards for things related to our environment and health). Amusingly, though you rail against anarchy, the actual ideals of anarchy fall in line with the concept of a free market (anarchy is really all about freedom of association rather than coercive structures; not a lack of order).

I can agree with this except this is the United States of America. The police here are REQUIRED to interfere. Whether or not you agree with the action is irrelevant. The lawmakers, elected by the people have decided, for better or worse, this course of action. And since the law itself is practical, not unjust, I doubt it will change any time soon.

*Edit,

I tend to agree with you on this issue. They would have had to do worse than taze me to keep me out. And in the father's defense, if he went outside to better reach his child than say through the smoke-filled house, as it seemed pretty bad in there, then I can feel understand his choice.

I say it's because Capitalism nears its end when there are fewer and fewer countries to abuse through market manipulation and force.

And @ChaosEngine, I think Gays, Blacks, Etc, all banded together as well. It became more group all around, just smaller groups, and that naturally means more exclusion (Any time you have people come together some other group must distance.)

I also don't think that the application to exclusion of minorities fully applies to the right. It is an economic issue really. Successful blacks take jobs (As should be their rights.) In fact, a great jump in equality came as a result of blacks joining white Unions for a common cause rather than blacks being used for cheap labors to destroy Union's powers. And did you know, Irish were considered dirty "black" as well? Dirty little Irish wanting jobs. Look at our hatred of Mexicants? Job grabbers.

Now Irish and Jews responded for the most part in positive ways. Many blacks; however, fell for a convenient trap. Easier I guess, in some respects. (Unjust in all--and I am speaking of the cultural traps, not black culture.)

Gays, well they are bad because insurance would be more expensive.

Economics. Abortion became immoral because of it...

i like maher, but I assume that under a republican regime, he would be raving about how unjust this whole thing is...

1. Read the First Amendment and tell me where it is granting you any right:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The operative phrase is a restriction on the power of Congress, not the endowment of a right upon individuals.

Also, the Declaration of Independence backs me up:

"that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights"

As does the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

"Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,"

These rights are yours simply because you are human, and they are inalienable - you can't give them away even if you want to.

2. You can not bring a lawsuit in US court for a violation of rights based upon legislation unless you have standing. In effect, you must demonstrate that a law has actually caused you harm in some illegitimate, unfair, or unconstitutional manner. One of the easiest ways to gain standing is to violate the law and suffer the consequences of what you perceive to be an unjust law.

3. The Supreme Court has only recognized a right to privacy from government intrusion not from individual or corporate intrusion. Furthermore, there is no assumption to a right to privacy in a public place. The most logical reason for the need to get a permit to film there is that the Park Service recognizes the economic value of licensing something that is in high demand (filming in front of the White House) and could care less about the privacy of individuals (citizens and non-citizens alike).

I say things like FUCK THE POLICE and I get downvoted. But clearly they're assholes with power trips. Even if there are so-called "good people" and "responsible officers", the policies in place to enforce so-called "justice" are UNJUST.

Fuck you if you're in law enforcement. I'm sorry, but FUCK YOU. I don't care if you're one of the good guys. All humans suck, no one is a hero, people all have their own value system.

The fact that they're just playing this woman with comments like "Oh, you have a law degree?" "I thought you said your husband works at home?"

Just trying their best to trip her up and call out "lies". It's a frame of mind and our law enforcement puts people -- humans, just like you and me -- into this state of mind.

Law enforcement has their own state of mind and they turn it in an us-versus-them situation all the time. Because they have authority. People have bad days and police are people. If you catch someone on a bad day they do bad things. Therefore this bullshit of manhandling your fellow citizen as a policy is RUBBISH.

Oh, police lives. Oh golly, the police lives that might end if they don't act like brutes. If they go easy on us, we'll kill them!! Right? Right... BULLSHIT.

Well, I'm about to get down voted into oblivion, but I have to state this as bluntly as possible.

This is the most perverted kind of propaganda that can be trotted out by someone, and it sickens me to see it. Glen is absolutely correct in every fact he points out, and is in that respect, doing nothing but telling the truth and educating his audience with things they likely didn't know before, and should have. It would seem that should be an unqualified good thing then, but it's not.

What makes this offensive propagandizing to me is the absolutely deliberate omission of equally true, relevant and significant facts that Glen can't help but be aware of. His sole purpose for the omission is that it suddenly shifts things from black and white into the gray that audiences don't like as much.

I'll start from the most important point, and the very premise of the talk, why do they hate us? There is a bigger question though that is even more illuminating, and it is why to they(jihadist terrorists) hate and kill their fellow Islamic countrymen and neighbours? The fact here is that jihadi terrorists before 9/11 and even more so since, have killed tens and hundreds of times as many middle eastern muslims than they have white western infidels. Glen points out plenty of reasons people can have to be upset with America over it's past actions, which is legit in itself, but NONE of those reasons explain why these jihadists target there own fellow middle eastern muslims for the exact same violence and retribution America faced on 9/11. The fact this makes plain is that the jihadi terrorists will hate not only us, but everyone who is not willing to join them unconditionally. They are not the misunderstood, historically slighted and unjustly maligned people Glen's talk might lead people to think of them as. They(jihadi terrorists) do not deserve our sympathy or apologies, their countrymen and neighbours that are their biggest victims do.

Glen also goes on to list the deaths from sanctions on Iraq as an American crime. Apparently Saddam's horrific(then American approved) war on Iran, his genocide of the Kurds, his extensive use of chemical weapons in both, his complete seizure of Kuwait and his genocide of Iraqi Shiites are not relevant to the discussion of placing sanctions on his country. In Glen's discussion, despite this laundry list of crimes against humanity, Saddam is entirely innocent and not in anyway to blame for the children starving in his country while he continued to build himself new palaces and kept his personal guard and secret police forces well equipped and well fed. How is one to take this seriously?

Finally, Glen omits a terrifically important American crime in East Timor that Bin Laden listed. No, sadly it's not our tacit support for the pro Islamic genocide of the people there in the past, but it was America's support for an end to that genocidal repression and support for a free and independent East Timor. This was listed near the very top of American crimes. When Zarqawi blew up the Canal Hotel in Baghdad, he was very clear that it wasn't for Iraqi children dead at the hands of American sanctions. It was because Sérgio Vieira de Mello(killed in the blast) helped over see the transition to a free East Timor.

I'm afraid I am beyond disappointed by talks like this, I find them offensive and contemptible.

So keeping a promise is more important than preventing war crimes; preventing the corruption of a government; upholding the freedom and morality of an entire civilisation; habeus corpus; magna carta (which is now been successfully rendered obselete in the US and many other countries); the bill of rights; and the US constitution?

More important than preventing the deaths of thousands of innocent people; allowing you to avoid an ignorant election of despots; preventing one government from unjustly interfering with the political process of another; more important than allowing a man to speak the truth?

And so I'm going to push this button; even when I have learned that it will destroy the Earth and everything on it, for I made a promise.

Yup, land of the free. Free of accountability, free of responsibility.
Oh wait, that was unjustly cynic. He owes him a beer.