*promote this wonderful TED Talk.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Louie Schwartzberg, Gratitude, TEDxSF' to 'Louie Schwartzberg, Gratitude, TEDxSF, TED talks' - edited by silvercord

http://videosift.com/video/Embrace-The-Re-Mix-TED-Talk-Edinburgh
Skip to 4:45 for the patent part.

Also worth watching:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFeC25BM9E0

Also, saw this in another forum about the law suit:
https://plus.google.com/114476892281222708332/posts/246srfbqg6G

>> ^Auger8:

@dag @ant @pumkinandstorm @mintbbb Someone help me out here and promote this, due to it's relevance in the recent lawsuit. I'd flag it as quality(I only have one Power Point) but I don't think it works the same as a promote does. Thanks guys. Promote the Arrogant Hypocrisy!

I think the idea that there is an infinite number of something, while useful in mathematics, has no practical reality. An infinite number of things cannot exist in reality.

>> ^KnivesOut:

What do Christian fundamentalists have against set theory?
Adequately describes why this video is useless bullshit.
"This is really where set theory starts to sound like something you thought up while high and later forgot about."

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Talks was originally meant to be a channel about Talks (like ted talks), debates, speeches etc. and not have interviews. That part sort of featurecreeped into it. At this point I probably don't think we need an interview channel, because it's so closely related channel, but I could swing either way.

If it happens, I will reform Talks to not include Interviews.

Maybe this gets better, but based on the first 8 minutes--worst TED talk ever. :-(

This video has been declared a duplicate by the original submitter; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by eric3579.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/TED-Talk-Why-is-x-the-unknown

Is this the same as...http://videosift.com/video/TED-Talk-Why-is-x-the-unknown

Your video, TED Talks: Track Your Trackers, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

I love how he presents to those people who can afford to actually attend TED talks and doesn't break into a cold sweat. He has to know, know that most of those there don't have any concept of who he is or what he has done.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Reggie Watts, TED, TED Talks' to 'Reggie Watts, TED, TED Talks, beatbox, live loop' - edited by xxovercastxx

I found the talk fairly mediocre, but it didn't come across at all partisan. I think its kinda of telling that they also believe a talk about contraceptives to also be "controversial". I dont think these issues are inherently political, but they are often made a political issue. They may as well censor almost any talk about climate change as needlessly partisan too (didn't Al Gore give a fucking TED talk? Was that not also partisan?)

Still, I am inclined to mostly believe their response. I think they were fucking retarded to ever suggest it was because it was partisan or controversial though.

See, now I think it's interesting from another angle. What sense of crazy entitlement must you have, that your TED talk doesn't get chosen, and the conclusion you draw is "TED has become corrupt and was paid off by my enemies"?

If that's something he thought TED was capable of, why did he want to be featured?

I think the obvious, logical conclusion is that his talk didn't measure up. For him to draw another conclusion says more about him, than about TED.