search results matching tag: Randy

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (329)     Sift Talk (7)     Blogs (45)     Comments (526)   

shagen454 (Member Profile)

Drunk Mayor Ford's Extremely Inebriated Secret Violent Rant

Krupo says...

The description was getting awfully long - but here's the additional context, worth reading this:

"Moments after the Star published the video online, Ford emerged from his office and apologized.

"The Toronto Star just released a video that I was very, very inebriated."

"All I can say is, again, I've made mistakes. I just wanted to come out and tell you I saw a video. It's extremely embarrassing. The whole world's going to see it. You know what? I don't have a problem with that."

"I hope none of you have ever or will ever be in that state. Obviously, I was extremely, extremely inebriated."

The target of the mayor's anger in the video is not in the room and is not known to the Star.

"I'll rip his f--king throat out. I'll poke his eyes out . . . . I'll make sure that motherf--ker's dead," Ford says, then hitches up his pant legs as if bracing for action.

His ire appears to be directed at someone who has called him, and brothers Doug and Randy, "liars, thieves."

The Star purchased the video from a source who filmed it from someone else's computer. The person with the computer was there in the room, the Star was told.

Wednesday, Ford's chief of staff Earl Provost said he could not speak to the Star about the video. "I am sorry I cannot talk to you about this," Provost said.

Also on Wednesday, the Star sent a transcript of the video, a description of the video's contents and an offer to show it to the following people in the mayor's circle: Ford, his brother Councillor Doug Ford, Provost, deputy chief of staff Sunny Petrujkic, spokesman Amin Massoudi, and to Ford's lawyer Dennis Morris.

The Star invited all of them to view the video, either at their office or the Star's office, and provide an explanation for Ford's behaviour. None of them took the Star up on its offer as of Thursday.

Last week, Police Chief Bill Blair announced that investigators recovered two video clips relevant to extortion charges laid against the mayor's "close friend" Alexander "Sandro" Lisi. One of those videos is of the mayor smoking what appears to be crack, which two Star reporters viewed in May.

There is no suggestion that this video is the second video Blair referred to in his press conference."

Local News Anchors React to Mike Myers' Baby Announcement

Telekinetic Coffee Shop Surprise

Preparation of Insane Japanese Dessert - Strawberry Balloon

chingalera says...

Admit it, you got wood just like Randy from South Park watching this~
Ill rhymes with bill, would make anyone ill; Reservations required, a la'Cafe on the Hill.

bareboards2 said:

Hard not to think of the many starving people around the world. I actually feel a little ill from watching this -- 1% indeed.

Your Balls Are More Beautiful Than You Think

How to Handle the Police When You're Videotaping

messenger says...

"We need the police." ≠ "Police can act as they wish at all times."

"We need the police." ≠ "We must excuse abusive police behaviour."

"We need the police." ≠ "The most important thing is that we take responsibility for our role in causing police to abuse their authority."

"We need the police." ≠ "We must show the police more respect than they show us."

"We need the police." ≠ "We must bend over if they get randy."

Sure we need police, but we need garbage men, postal workers and transit fare collectors too, and I don't think you would extend this tolerance of abuse towards them. Why the special pleading for the police?

VoodooV said:

Yeah ching, you're simply not a good person.

I'm not excusing their failings. spaghetti monster knows they have a lot of them, but the fact of the matter is that we *need* the police and your paranoid rage towards cops good or bad simply doesn't help things. Be part of the solution, not the problem. and yelling at them really isn't helping anything. You've got a legitimate complaint that cops have a corruptsion or incompetence problem....well work to fix it then instead of whining like a spoiled brat.

You Deserve A Handjob!

siftbot says...

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Randy Quaid, infommercial, terrible, pop under pressure, ffffuuuuuuuu' to 'infommercial, terrible, pop under pressure, ffffuuuuuuuu, handjob' - edited by gwiz665

THE UNBELIEVERS - Richard Dawkins & Lawrence Krauss

Hybrid says...

"The film includes interviews with celebrities and other influential people who support the work of these controversial speakers, including:

Ricky Gervais
Woody Allen
Cameron Diaz
Stephen Hawking
Sarah Silverman
Bill Pullman
Werner Herzog
Tim Minchin
Eddie Izzard
Ian McEwan
Adam Savage
Ayaan Hirsi-Ali
Penn Jillette
Sam Harris
Dan Dennett
James Randi
Cormac McCarthy
Paul Provenza
James Morrison
Michael Shermer
David Silverman
...and more.

www.unbelieversmovie.com"

Psychics Humiliated On National TV

ulysses1904 says...

I've been a fan of Randi since he was the executioner in the Alice Cooper shows in the early 70s. But I couldn't watch a minute of this crap. The host is a perfect blend of every TV/Internet/video/pop culture cliche. He makes Kathy Griffin seem tolerable.

Psychics Humiliated On National TV

Trancecoach says...

Epistemological issues seem so central to everything. Within the libertarian devotion to reason that Chomsky has praised, two camps seem to be at odds with one another, in a kind of in-house brawl.
One camp holds the empiricist skeptics who also happen to favor scientific materialism (like Penn Jillette and James Randi and some others you may not have heard about, or maybe you have) and the other camp holds the natural law axiomatic-deductive philosophers who don't outright dismiss homeopathic medicine, for example, and who question flouride in the water.
We can broadly see at least seven different positions. One writer I enjoyed a bit in college, Robert Anton Wilson, seems to have accepted empiricism in conjunction with intuitive-mysticism as valid sources of knowledge but not axiomatic-deductive reasoning. He wrote a short piece on his opposition to natural law in "Natural Law and Don't Put a Rubber on Your Willy." I don't think he developed his opposition thoroughly. He devoted more to his writing to oppose scientism (like double-bind dogmatic empiricism) with a whole book, "The New Inquisition."
Another position is that of Ayn Rand and her Objectivist followers who accepted neither intuitive-mystical knowledge nor much empiricism, but only (or mostly) axiomatic-deductive reasoning.
In my opinion, a stronger view accepts all three and tests theories against all three.

Psychics Humiliated On National TV

Banned "Australia Day" Commercial.

True Facts About The Seahorse

gorillaman (Member Profile)

chingalera says...

...not a damn thang 'cept bein' the gorillaman-I get randy when I drink Cheers from choggie☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯
775;☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯☯
;☯☯☯☯☯☯☯

gorillaman said:

Hey thanks mate, what did I do to deserve that?



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon