*ban


http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2uhf8l_a-m-sniper-feat-anamate-and-oxide-neutrino-bye-radio-wave-jaguar-skills-remix_music#from=embediframe

Not an unfair comment (neutrinos... /lol oops, spoiler alert!), but tragic disaster should feel appropriately tragic even if the premise for the disaster is shaky.

photons are massless, its invariant mass..you will have to google that,,,,.neutrinos DO NOT travel faster than light.

The universe is the totality of existance and contains all there is..

The universe has no edge ....that would violate every accepted model of the universe...the universe is homogeneous and isotropic..

parts of the universe beyond our vision are not older than our part..we are the same age...

There is ZERO evidence to support any claim of any other universes..NONE..

You can hypothesis we live in a giants ass if you want,,,but there is no evidence to support that...the claim there are other universes,and the claim we exist in a giants ass, have the same amount of evidence..

From what I've been taught, it takes infinite energy to accelerate mass to the speed of light, which would mean neutrinos will never reach the speed of light either, maybe close but not fully, unless maybe all the energy in the universe could be utilized to make it happen, and even then it's questionable.

AFAIK, photons have mass, but in a theoretical state of zero velocity they theoretically don't have mass (which can't currently be tested).

As for neutrinos, I said, "at or faster than the speed of light", not "faster than the speed of light". I never claimed they do go faster than the speed of light, because the jury's still out on that one. This is still a debate that divides the physics community and the matter is far from settled.

How about -sometimes photons appear to have mass, sometimes they don't.

As for Neutrinos, apparently they also can't exceed the speed of light. The experiment that said they might was flawed.
http://www.gizmag.com/neutrinos-sub-light-speed/22876/

No they don't. Sort of. It's complicated.

I don't know about neutrinos, but I'm fairly certain they don't travel faster than light. There was an experiment a few years back that seemed to suggest they did, but as far as I know it is now thought to have been an error. It did make for an interesting paradox - I'm told the experiment was only possible due to very accurate GPS, which of course relies very heavily on both general and special relativity. The ftl result undermined their own methodology.

Tachyons haven't really been proven.

One theory that has a lot of merit (apparently) is that neutrinos are tachyons.

Photon's have mass, certainly, but neutrinos go faster than light? First I've ever heard of that, are you sure you don't mean tachyons?

Umm... photons have mass.

Why is he saying they don't have mass?

Neutrinos also travel at or faster than the speed of light and have mass.

Faster-than-light neutrinos could be down to bad wiring

In September 2011, the Opera experiment reported it had seen particles called neutrinos evidently travelling faster than the speed of light.

The team has now found two problems that may have affected their test in opposing ways: one in its timing gear and one in an optical fibre connection...............



So, *fail, but that how science goes.

Those are the dudes...
>> ^vaire2ube:

tumbleweeds
anyways...
http://science.slashdot.o
rg/story/11/12/20/2337213/undersea-neutrino-observatory-to-be-second-largest-human-structure

If neutrinos are the "vampires of physics" then does their skin sparkle in the sun when they take their shirts off?

*tumbleweeds*

anyways...

http://science.slashdot.org/story/11/12/20/2337213/undersea-neutrino-observatory-to-be-second-largest-human-structure

A neutrino is how Ned Flanders says "Newt".