It is ALMOST all the same dudes. Joel and a few others do Cinematic Titanic but Rifftrax KILLS them with hilarity. CT just tries to hard and is over produced.

>> ^poolcleaner:

>> ^enoch:
mystery science theatre 3000...right?right?

Yeah, it's the same dudes.

>> ^enoch:
mystery science theatre 3000...right?right?


Yeah, it's the same dudes.

mystery science theatre 3000...right?right?

Right, but the Mystery Science Theatre version of Manos is absolute comedy gold.

I've seen all of the versions of "Screw Loose Change." I find them quite interesting, and at some times, even quite humorous, but I do think, like "Loose Change," the person that made them did so just to be heard - I think of it as "preaching to the choir" - basically, they created it, not actually having been there, and arguing for the sake of arguing.

Fact of the matter is, when it comes to "who has a more media-based foot to stand on" - of course it's going to be the people who believe the official story - it's "official," and that is, seemingly, enough for them to believe. Having yet another documentary(besides the ones airing on every major media outlet on TV[except Rosie on ABC recently, of course]) that explains the official story, and argues citing those stories - well, that's nothing new, and the thing that bugged me about "Screw Loose Change" is that it really didn't refute any of "Loose Change"'s scientific evidence - it just pointed out where the creators of "Loose Change" screwed up an equation, or a couple facts, or ridiculed them for even questioning the official story. That left a really bad taste with me, as I really want to see the physical and scientific evidence that refutes their side of the argument - I want to see them run the ACTUAL calculations themselves, and post a documentary showing them, not just a "Mystery Science Theatre" on a documentary.