search results matching tag: JJ

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (102)     Sift Talk (7)     Blogs (3)     Comments (214)   

April Fail 2014!

Colbert's Very Wanted - Who Took Gumby?

Massive rally crash in Norway

J.J. Cale & Leon Russell- Crazy Mama @ Paradise Studios

Meet The Pink Helmet Posse

8-Bit Inhabitants of Planet 9

Obama Tries to Fix the Shutdown Government with Apple

JiggaJonson (Member Profile)

Unauthorized Ad: Mercedes Detects Danger Before It Comes Up

What if Star Wars Episode II Were Good? (Belated Media)

AeroMechanical says...

Almost anything would have been better. To my mind, the single biggest flaw with the prequels was that the originals focused on a small set of largely likeable characters who were generally together having adventures in space. The Prequels were just all over the place and there weren't really any likeable characters, and... and... for the sake of brevity, let's just say they suck in every way.

Also, for the love of god, George Lucas should not have been allowed to direct. He is a terrible, terrible, terrible director. Everyone knows that. Everyone has known that since the first one, and George should have known that too. He isn't a great artist in any sense of the word. I'd say the prequels are a textbook example of why the role of director is so important. How can such an accomplished cast deliver a performance barely better than what you'd expect from, say, "Sharktopus."

I think the next three will be decent. They don't have to be great (and really, the original three weren't *great* per se, they were just novel fun, imaginative, and hit a sweet spot. I think JJ Abrams will do fine.

Anyways, this guys plot would have worked. So would have a lot of others though.

freeD Yankee Stadium

shatterdrose says...

Probably none, or simply render times. My guess is their goal is to allow a frozen moment, such as when the runner comes into home, to show from various angles that A) the ball was in the mitt but B) the runners foot was already on base. Mostly, but not limiting the view angles you can more clearly see the action while if the motion was still ongoing while the camera moved, it'd cause a jarring effect on the viewer and make it even more confusing as to what really happened.

It's why JJ Abrams shakes the camera a lot. It helps hide the flaws in action scenes such as where people don't actually stab each other or hit each other etc.

Esoog said:

Im at newb at this kind of stuff. Why do they always have to freeze the frame to do the transition? What limitation is preventing it from being done on the moving video?

If you like SciFi - go see Oblivion (Blog Entry by dag)

dystopianfuturetoday says...

I liked this film too. Most sci-fi movies these days are action movies in space, no offense to JJ Abrams, but Oblivion actually had some ideas working for it. Nice twists and turns. My only complaint is that they could have come up with a more interesting ending.

'SONGS Trek': Star Trek-Themed Safety Video At Nuclear Power

Cdr. Hadfield Last Transmission From The Int'l Space Station

Girl gets kicked by horse!!



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon