>> ^Baera:
I like how the reviewer makes a case that 60 bucks makes it a bargain. -And that he would even pay 300 bucks for it. Sounds to me like a little jab at those who have not been able to get a 360 or PS3 yet. I have, but I don't think I'm interested in the plot. Oh wait, the reviewer forgot to mention the plot.


Forgot the plot?

..is this sarcasm?

I'll start with a quote "Even IF the single-player wasn't that great, the multiplayer makes it worth while."

"The single player has an incredible amount of depth."

And then from IGN itself, the written review


"Don't worry, GTA's famed over-the-top action and tongue-in-cheek humor are intact, but there is a new level of sophistication in the characters and the game world that raises the story above the norm."

and finally,
"10 Presentation
The story is Oscar quality. The use of the phone as a gaming portal is genius. There's really nothing more that could be asked for from GTA IV."


And then, this, because the concept just sounds awesome,

"And then there is Cops n' Crooks, the best of the objective-based multiplayer games. This has two teams, one side lawmen, the other hoodlums. The crooks are trying to get to a randomly selected extraction point and the cops are trying to arrest them with bullets. This mode forces teamwork, as both teams must strategize on the fly and rely on one another to assist in navigation. I"

I fuckin' hate cops like this. What a jackass. Resisting arrest, disorderly conduct, interference of "law enforcement officer"... Battery?!? For falling down and skinning his own knee? Good thing these brave men are out there protecting us from dangerous hoodlums such as these. Only useful purpose these assholes serve is raising revenue for the city/county/state.