Boxing just never made as much sense to me as MMA. Boxing just feels so limited in comparison, no grappling, no submissions. Sure an MMA fighter wouldnt stand a chance going up against a boxer if he had to use boxing rules, but it doesnt make sense to limit yourself to only one way of defeating your oponent when it comes to fighting. If you have trouble seeing my point, imagine a new form of boxing where you could only use one arm and had to keep the other one on your back. How much sense would that make?

Now there are rules and limits to what you can do in MMA, but I imagine they evolved to make sure fighters spent less time in hospitals and more time on the screen making money for people like Dana White.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'High Dive, Vertigo, wow' to 'High Dive, Vertigo, wow, Dana Kunze, world record' - edited by SlipperyPete

Poor heavily armed Israeli troops attacked with sticks and knives.

Fucking ridiculous.

By the way looks like he comes from the school of Dana Perino the way he spins that bullshit.
http://videosift.com/video/Dana-Perino-gets-to-scoop-up-Cheneys-shit

>> ^IAmTheBlurr:

Hahhahaha! "My name is DarWIN... not DarLOSE!" Classic!


If only we had thought of this argument against creationists decades ago, we would have won for sure. The clear link between artificial selection and natural selection through the use of breeding, millions off fossils, near mathematical proof through DNA sequencing and the distribution of animals showing every sign of common descent doesnt stand a chance against such a kick-ass tagline

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

LOL. Issy and I actually shut off Sherlock Holmes halfway through and mailed it back to Netflix. Horrible.


I finally saw Sherlock Holmes a few days ago and it was exactly as horrible and ridiculous as this parody makes it seem, which brings up a question... If a parody of a thing is so close to its subject as to be almost exactly the same, does it cease to be parody and become mere mimicry?

Whoops, my memory failed me. It was made by Dana Lyons: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cows_with_guns

Tags for this video have been changed from 'cows, guns, funny, scary, three dead trolls in a baggie' to 'cows, guns, funny, scary, Dana Lyons' - edited by gwiz665

Someone on Digg posted that. I think it involved code. Check hulu.com and there's a start and end capture code.

In reply to this comment by MikesHL13:
I saw that you edited the clip for Dana Carvey Impressions to start in the middle and end before the end. How do you do that? Someone explained to me how to start at a certain point by adding "start=" in the embed, but I haven't been able to figure out how to do end at a specific point before the end of embed.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

I first saw Dana Snyder, the voice of Master Shake, on "Saul of the Mole Men," one of [adult swim]'s live action joints. And I remember it blowing my mind then. I hear him everywhere now. He's the Alchemist in "The Venture Bros.," Granny on "Squidbillies," and even some character named Gazpacho on "Chowder," one of the wacky shows for kids on Cartoon Network.

Little known fact: the voices of Meatwad and Err are also producers on ATHF.

Joseph Dana, one of the co-creators of the video above, has written the following to explain why he and Max Blumenthal made the video, and what he thinks it shows:

It’s about entitlement, stupid.

Max and I went on to the streets of Jerusalem at ten o’clock on a Wednesday to ascertain the feelings of the young population about Obama’s upcoming speech in Cairo. As is often the case, the streets of central Jerusalem were not filled with native Israelis but American Jews. Doubtlessly anyone who has visited Jerusalem has encountered the droves of American Jewish kids that are sent to Israel to study for a period of time from Teaneck or Westchester. We asked people a simple question, “What do you think of Obama and Israel?” Most of the people that we talked to were dual American Israeli citizens. The answers in this video reflect the education and worrisome perspectives that many American Jews harbor towards Israeli politics. The sense of entitlement that the American Jewish community has when it comes to Israeli policy is on full raw display in the words of these young adults.

Based on our interviews these people were from high socio economic backgrounds and had developed thoughts about current Israeli politics. The question is why more journalists are not covering this story. All you have to do is walk the streets of Jerusalem and you will find dozens of people that harbor the same beliefs. As a resident of Jerusalem, I can say that the people represented in this video are not members of a fringe group or simply drunk college kids. These people reflect the sentiments shared by many people in this country and this city. These people and their families are the core of the opposition to meaningful peace between Israel and her neighbors. This is what Obama is up against.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Rick and steve, dana, butch, lipstick, truck, mullet, flat top' to 'Rick and steve, dana, butch, lipstick, truck, mullet, flat top, happiest gay couple' - edited by kronosposeidon

>> ^newtboy:
RedSky- can you really tell me with all due certainty that gun ownership makes people safer and doesn't empower the criminal who is almost guaranteed to catch the victim without a gun just conveniently in reach? Can you really tell me without a shadow of a doubt that the whole notion that guns make people safer, a very parochially American view is not manufactured propaganda by the US gun industry to serve their own financial interests with a complete indifference to the death of their own countrymen?
I can tell you with certainty that legal gun ownership makes people safer and doesn't empower the criminal as much as outlawing gun ownership does. The criminals, as you say, have many ways of buying guns illegally which are not affected by gun laws, these methods do NOT disapear when guns are made illegal, unless there is a magical way to make all guns disapear.
I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt that having the law abiding portion of Citizens armed against the non-law abiding, well armed portion makes the law abiding portion safer. (ask any police officer if he's safer with a gun or without) If there truely were a way to remove ALL guns, that might not be true. I do not know of any such magic.


I cannot know either for certain, because social policy and effects cannot be tested in a controlled experiment as in science. I can though, examine statistics and try to discern conclusions. That is why I phrased my conclusion without certainty, while assertions which aren't based on any theory or data are merely unsubstantiated opinions.

I never claimed guns would disappear. Supply though would significantly dry up over time, and as a result prices would rise. Not to mention the mere conversion to illegality would introduce a significant barrier to entry for the aspiring petty criminal or mentally unstable gunman who with no prior history of crime, probably wouldn't have the contacts to acquire a firearm, at least without considerable difficulty. Again, would guns disappear from organised crime? Of course not, but the cost of their activities would certainly rise at least in the long term.

As for police officers being safer with guns. Yes, duh. You know what else would make them feel safer? Reducing the gun ownership rate per capita.

>> ^ReverendTed:
What kills more people every year? Abuse of alcohol or abuse of firearms?
Just figured I'd toss that lit cigarette into the powder keg.

I agree. We should only focus on a single cause of deaths and disregard anything else.

>> ^newtboy:
(ask any police officer if he's safer with a gun or without)


I forgot about this part.

1. What point are you trying to make here? Ask a soldier if he feels safer with a gun or without too. Joe public isn't a police officer nor a soldier.

2. The police officer may FEEL safer with a gun, but does that make him actually safer? Again, there is absolutely no way to tell because it is impossible to present 2 identical environments with the variable being gun control. Try gun control out and let us see how it goes for the next 100 years, and in 100 years time we can compare 20 years solid of guns vs. no guns.

But again i slap my head and ask why i even bothered getting involved - people like you have no idea what constitutes evidence, fact, trends, anything like that. You've got such limited scope that you can't get past the idea that "If i have a gun i can protect myself against other guns!" There is SO MUCH MORE to it than that, such as "WHAT IF YOU GO FUCKING BATSHIT CRAZY AND START SHOOTING UP A SCHOOL?" but you'll never see that far you ignorant arse. Not only are you people ignorant but you're loud too, at least stay quiet and people might not realise.. and let those people get on with building a better world, you'll thank us later - but probably not.