Sizing

It's really irritating that 99.9% of men's underwear has insufficient specificity in sizing. Seriously, only 5 sizes for everybody? What the heck are they thinking? With how many millions of pairs are sold every month, you'd think they could have more, like 15 or 20 sizes.

Also, I hate the elastic waistbands that are used as a crutch for wildly inaccurate sizing. On every pair of underwear I have, either the waistband is too tight or the rest of it is too baggy. And i'm not fat at all. My body mass index is completely average (Rather below average, considering I live in the USA).

If it's sized properly it should apply no more pressure than the minimum that is necessary to prevent it from falling off. Every underwear I've tried applies several orders of magnitude more than that, or else falls off. I've tried taking underwear that fits perfectly, except for the elastic waistband that applies too much pressure, and stretched it out as much as possible in order to weaken the elastic. That helps a little bit.
ReverendTed says...

The sizing tends to be just as ambiguous, but I switched to boxer briefs a few years ago and I've never looked back.

>> ^peggedbea:
just dont wear them.
ive never understood the point in underwear anyway.

Seriously? Man, I'd be tripping over it all the time if I didn't have someplace to roll it up.

jwray says...

>> ^Doc_M:
You get what you pay for. Try a few brand names... real ones.


I have. Calvin Klein is the same crap as generic Target underwear, but with fancier graphics and an even thicker waistband.

All they have to do is put 1/10 as many elastic fibers in the waistband, to weaken the elastic by a factor of 10. Why should I have to pay more for less? Likewise for food that is produced without massive amounts of artificial colors/flavors/preservatives.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

New Blog Posts from All Members