Uncut Ron Paul Interview - Ron Paul Didn't "Storm Off"

YouTube Description:

CNN finally released the full interview. It shows that Ron Paul didn't "storm off" - the interview was over.All parts of the interview that make Gloria Borger look ridiculous were cut out of the heavily edited and misleading version that aired on CNN: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5LtbXG62esPropagandist Borger ends the interview with an outrageous insinuation and lie: "Some of this stuff was very incendiary, you know... saying that in 1993 the Israelis were responsible for the bombing of the World Trade Center".The newsletters, politically incorrect as they might have been, NEVER made such a claim.The corporate media will stop at nothing to discredit Ron Paul, but thanks to a growing understanding on part of the public of "how the system works", the media's efforts aren't just not working, they are backfiring.Ron Paul remains the undisputed frontrunner in Iowa (as documented by five consecutive polls by various organizations). Nationally, Ron Paul gained 5% on both Gingrich and Romney among Republican voters over the past 5 days, i.e. during the worst phase of the media attack.
Barsepssays...

Reporters no longer ASK questions, what they do is "ask"..... & then slip an answer in (by way of still not being finished "asking the question") & waiting for the other guy to confirm or deny it. I think Ron Paul handled this one quite well.

^Upvoted^

packosays...

i'd trust a politician more if they had their own camera crew follow them, and also tape their own copy of EVERY interview they give... then post the entire thing online

there'd be more accountability in that honest politicians would actually have their actual positions get out there...
and the "system" could catch them on things they wouldn't put out there

the problem still lies with politicians aligned with media... it isn't hard to make a list of them, speaking of both news sources and politicians (including some current/recent runners)

in there era of the internet why this isn't happening when it is SO easy to do is indicative of just how corrupt the system is

Grimmsays...

You probably don't care...but that picture only proves that Don Black supports Ron Paul. It does not prove that Ron Paul knew who that person was or what their personal agenda is.>> ^pukwudgie:

Is this the same Ron Paul who did not write all those racist newsletters who is standing here smiling with the founder of Stormfront racist Don Black? [image]

pukwudgiesays...

But we know that Ron Paul knows who is Don Black the founder of Stormfront. The last time around Ron Paul refused to disavow Don Black or to return the Stormfront money supporting Paul's previous election campaign. Ron Paul has made his name pandering to the far-right racist fringe demographic. And then there are all those many racist newsletters. Which he claims he didn't write. But a politician would never lie. Especially not while he is trying to get elected.

dannym3141says...

>> ^pukwudgie:

But we know that Ron Paul knows who is Don Black the founder of Stormfront. The last time around Ron Paul refused to disavow Don Black or to return the Stormfront money supporting Paul's previous election campaign. Ron Paul has made his name pandering to the far-right racist fringe demographic. And then there are all those many racist newsletters. Which he claims he didn't write. But a politician would never lie. Especially not while he is trying to get elected.


I'll be honest, i'm a fence sitter. All i have to go off is the stuff i see here. Bearing this in mind but also the amount of bullshit spread about by both media and people parrotting the media, i want to know two things;

a) The post i quoted reads like a list of opinions without any proof. In this day and age, where the media finds it so easy to entirely fabricate some bullshit and have it stick to someone - let alone true things - why have i only seen opinion and no proof about these things (and other things) that you (and others) accuse ron paul of?

b) Facts rule. The picture you linked shows that the two people were once within 5 feet of each other and your opinions hold no sway with me. If you made a big sift talk post for example, with a step by step breakdown of how you can prove ron paul is a racist or anything else you like, you might change some minds.

Grimmsays...

Yes..he knows NOW who he is...and so do you...does that mean you support his views?

http://videosift.com/video/Ron-Paul-I-dont-want-white-supremacists-support>> ^pukwudgie:

But we know that Ron Paul knows who is Don Black the founder of Stormfront. The last time around Ron Paul refused to disavow Don Black or to return the Stormfront money supporting Paul's previous election campaign. Ron Paul has made his name pandering to the far-right racist fringe demographic. And then there are all those many racist newsletters. Which he claims he didn't write. But a politician would never lie. Especially not while he is trying to get elected.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More