"Teaching the Controversy" in Regards to Science Education

Philosopher A.C. Grayling explains why "Teaching the Controversy" isn't a good approach to science education, whether it's regarding Evolution, Astronomy or Medicine.
Opus_Moderandisays...

damn, even I know that you don't have to get too far into Astrology or Demon Possession to realize how stupid / obsolete they are. Which is why they are not part of an (sane) educational curriculum. And, for me, the same holds true for creationism / intelligent design / religion. Which is why they aren't part of an (sane) educational curriculum either.

I think the point this guy is trying to make is way too obvious.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More