Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
6 Comments
nanrodsays...Help save John Oliver. Close Gitmo!
Also...you suck. I just spent 20 minutes watching this before getting around to sifting it only to find you'd beaten me by 8 minutes.
iauijokingly says...*Promote.
Y'know, I think it's good to shut Guantanamo down just for principle's sake but as far as being worried about John being sent to prison there... I mean, it's not like either one of the Presidential candidates have actively advocated for sending their political foes to prison like a dictator, right?
Right?
.
.
siftbotsays...Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Monday, October 10th, 2016 12:03am PDT - promote requested by iaui.
kulpimssays...*quality
siftbotsays...Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by kulpims.
MilkmanDansays...I agree with Oliver here, but I think he sorta missed an opportunity to talk about confirming exactly who our US Constitutional protections should apply to.
It has been all-to-common in the past decade-plus for people / bodies in our government to "justify" questionable actions by saying that they were performed on people who aren't US citizens. Detain and torture suspected (or *known*) terrorists indefinitely without trial? That's fine, they aren't citizens. Send drone strikes against people outside of US borders that we suspect may be aiding terrorists, even though collateral damage is likely? Meh, they aren't Americans. Spy on people, record and intercept their communications to the greatest extent possible without a warrant or probable cause? Never mind -- we're not doing it to our own citizens (even though we now know that even that justification is an outright lie).
It would be nice for the government to take a stand and state that ALL of the protections that are granted by our constitution and have made our country what it is should actually be considered universal and binding in terms of how our government interacts with ALL people, not just US citizens.
Freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, fair trial, no unreasonable searches and seizures, etc. etc. Consistently and universally applied whenever the government has any interaction with any human being on the planet -- inside or outside of US soil, and whether that person is a US Citizen or not.
I suppose it would take a constitutional amendment to codify that. That would require 2/3 support in congress -- so I won't hold my breath. But here is where a president with true leadership could step up and say that whether there is an official amendment codifying that or not, every government office under his (or her) command should behave as though that was law. All the 3-letter agencies, the military, etc. I think that would get the ball rolling and make an amendment possible on down the line.
Our constitutional protections are arguably what made our country great. We have nothing to lose and everything to gain by proving that to the rest of the world by actually standing by the courage of our own convictions.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.