Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
7 Comments
nadabusays...That's the way to do it!
choggiesays...kinna prefer stocks in the town square, m'self-
If a judge made X to do this in front of a Wal-Mart?....X would have to tell him to go fuck himself-
Who would have taken care of his dog while he was in jail, and did he have to pay for the frikkin' placard?
cheesemoosays...Good point choggie. The cost of that placard is probably more than the price of what he stole. I'd guess that he paid for it...
winkler1says...much greater deterrent effect than a week in the clink..
Trancecoachsays...I think this rationale should extend to other crimes as well. Shoplifters wear a sandwich board. Armed burglars need to confess in person wearing pink leotards on live television during football games. Bank robbers need to prepare a figure skating routine and wear a tutu. This could work!
laurasays...I really think they should have made him uncover his face, though.
budzossays...I agree, he should at least have to show his face.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.