racist propaganda

>> ^billpayer:

racist propaganda


His main criticism is directed at the Muslim faith, which is not a race.

In terms of an answer to your suggestion, I will let Chris Hedges do that:

"Unlimited Tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.
In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.

We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal."

by its own "holy" book, islam demands one of 3 choices for faithful muslims encountering infidels: kill, convert or enslave. A fourth option is to pretend to assimilate into a society, until the muslim minority becomes a majority. Then, enact sharia law.

islam = freedom fail

To prove free speech isn't on the decline, they should prosecute him endlessly. Brilliant.

>> ^quantumushroom:

by its own "holy" book, islam demands one of 3 choices for faithful muslims encountering infidels: kill, convert or enslave. A fourth option is to pretend to assimilate into a society, until the muslim minority becomes a majority. Then, enact sharia law.
islam = freedom fail


Exactly! Which is why Muhammad invaded everyone. Ho, wait, the Muslim expansion wasn't during his lifetime.
But yeah, after that they choked all other faiths. Ho wait, it was actually forbidden to convert for two hundred years. Anyway, after that they sure enslaved all those infidels. Well except the Jews. And the Christians. And, erm, the Mazdaists.

Ha damnit, I have to give it to you QM, I can't lie as well as you do (-:

Your ignorance is sadly typical, but perhaps curable. There's no need to 'lie' about islam and the quran, they are their own worst enemies.

The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/023-violence.htm

You are presently duped into defending a pedophile warlord and the defective and inferior civilizations that are the best islam can produce. More studying on your part is required.


>> ^9547bis:


>> ^quantumushroom:
by its own "holy" book, islam demands one of 3 choices for faithful muslims encountering infidels: kill, convert or enslave. A fourth option is to pretend to assimilate into a society, until the muslim minority becomes a majority. Then, enact sharia law.
islam = freedom fail

Exactly! Which is why Muhammad invaded everyone. Ho, wait, the Muslim expansion wasn't during his lifetime.
But yeah, after that they choked all other faiths. Ho wait, it was actually forbidden to convert for two hundred years. Anyway, after that they sure enslaved all those infidels. Well except the Jews. And the Christians. And, erm, the Mazdaists.
Ha damnit, I have to give it to you QM, I can't lie as well as you do (-: