THIS.

>> ^ChaosEngine:

You know what? Despite how much I think that those women are idiots, I can actually live with their stupid tirade. What was done to that poor guy was undoubtedly wrong, and that woman should go to jail. But I really don't care enough about the opinions of those women for their jokes on the subject to bother me. The act itself bothers me far more. So yeah, they're wrong and stupid, but their wrongness and stupidity pales into insignificance compared to the real and seriously fucked up issues facing women globally. Do you really think that, shrill shrieking harpies that they are, those women would actually mutilate a man like that? Well, maybe Sharon Osbourne.
Genital mutilation and gang rape are still not unusual in the third world. So frankly, these bitches can have their pathetic little comedy segment. If you want to fix a house, do you worry about the picture that's hanging crooked or the cracks in the foundation? That picture needs straightening al right, but it's just not a priority.
On a sidenote, there's an interesting dynamic in that clip. Sharon Osbourne hijacks the debate and decides it's hilarious. The rest of them look momentarily shocked, but decide to go along with it since the audience thinks it's "outrageous". Sara Gilbert makes a vain attempt to inject some sense, but she's steam-rolled by Sharon. I'd say it would have been a very different piece without her there.

You know what? Despite how much I think that those women are idiots, I can actually live with their stupid tirade. What was done to that poor guy was undoubtedly wrong, and that woman should go to jail. But I really don't care enough about the opinions of those women for their jokes on the subject to bother me. The act itself bothers me far more. So yeah, they're wrong and stupid, but their wrongness and stupidity pales into insignificance compared to the real and seriously fucked up issues facing women globally. Do you really think that, shrill shrieking harpies that they are, those women would actually mutilate a man like that? Well, maybe Sharon Osbourne.

Genital mutilation and gang rape are still not unusual in the third world. So frankly, these bitches can have their pathetic little comedy segment. If you want to fix a house, do you worry about the picture that's hanging crooked or the cracks in the foundation? That picture needs straightening al right, but it's just not a priority.

On a sidenote, there's an interesting dynamic in that clip. Sharon Osbourne hijacks the debate and decides it's hilarious. The rest of them look momentarily shocked, but decide to go along with it since the audience thinks it's "outrageous". Sara Gilbert makes a vain attempt to inject some sense, but she's steam-rolled by Sharon. I'd say it would have been a very different piece without her there.

What I took from this is that Sara Gilbert is alright, but Marie Osborn is a terrifying harpy. I always suspected as much, now there's finally proof.

>> ^MarineGunrock:

Michelle Bachman: Because Sara Palin knows she doesn't have a chance.

Also, did she finish with "Muslim Catholics"?


I think she said "It's being taken over, by, by a, um, by a Muslim ethlic". Apparently choking on her own racism.

Michelle Bachman: Because Sara Palin knows she doesn't have a chance.



Also, did she finish with "Muslim Catholics"?

>> ^Skeeve:

True... if there were 10,000 women and no men. If we are optimistic and say there were as many women as men then I think she was right on the number of boobs .
>> ^BoneRemake:
I think her math is off. There should be a lot closer to 20 000 boobs out and about during the bike ride.



Your science is better than my science.

Alternate un-blurred version (only Sara is un-blurred) can be found here for those that are interested in that kind of thing....and by thing I'm talking about bewbs.

http://videosift.com/video/Sara-Underwood-s-Naked-Bike-Ride-Alternate-Un-blurred

I clicked on the link to get a facefull of nekkid bikeriders and all I got was Sara Underwood. I am disappoint.

>> ^arvana:

And if you MUST know what you're missing under the censored patches: http://www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/xeoltx [NSFW]

True... if there were 10,000 women and no men. If we are optimistic and say there were as many women as men then I think she was right on the number of boobs .
>> ^BoneRemake:

I think her math is off. There should be a lot closer to 20 000 boobs out and about during the bike ride.

>> ^arvana:

And if you MUST know what you're missing under the censored patches: http://www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/xeoltx [NSFW]


Cameraman, check this out... the zoom ring... it goes both ways

It's funny because when G4 originally aired this they did not have Sara blurred out. You couldn't see anything because she had on a flesh colored bottom and flesh colored pasties. I was surprised that at 7pm they decided to show her essentially topless but with her nipples covered. Not complaining...just surprised.

I already knew Sara Underwood was one of the hottest women around, now I know she is also pretty cool. Thank you for that.

As far as the press releases and lack thereof--how often do you hear about illegal chemicals being used against Palestine protesters? Or how about the wikileaks child-selling contracts? Oh, you hear the mundane garbage they want to feed America, because they are corporations selling a product. However, we should distinguish between what is "in the news" (i.e., articles Justin Beiber's haircut, Sara Palin's stupid emails) and what is actually "newsworthy."

The next point, one that makes me infinitely sad, is that AMERICA IS CORRUPTION. *Sorry, for some reason I cannot bold shit, so I made it caps...

Just take a sampling of the corruption. Parents, Teachers (Hi, I just had sex with your kid and won't do any jail time because I am a woman,) Judges, Politicians, Medical Professionals, Oil Exs, (A joke, we expect that,) Priests, Cops, and pretty much everyone else. Are these abuses of power that are unexpected? Yes. I cannot fathom, least expect, a father throwing his child from a moving car because the kid wet his bed--but it happens. We should expect it by now.

In light of that, excluding cops, for the reasons that it is not right, unexpected, different, and abuse of power, etc., seems preposterous to me.

Thanks Ry and Hp and Gun and MrFrisk, and even though I am tired from a lot of work and playing with my children, I figure I will respond half asleep because those were well put.

Another big note; I am afraid of the cultural war issue more than everything. Hp, you said what I fear the most--in essence at least. That the Law is afraid of suits and using defense that anyone would be entitled to. That when the law does use force, it will be condemned. That when a officer dies, certain parts of a town rejoice.

A boy was shot a while back and a city next to mine got in an uproar (But the officer used sound judgement, yet that matters not. Just white on black, cop on kid/with gun...) That is how fanaticism starts. It is rarely a huge leap (Like Sept 11th) that starts a cultural shift to hatred. The Muslim nations that are extremely oppressive cultivate the hatred with fear and more hatred.

(And that also goes for people hating homosexuals, race, etc. I fear for that just the same. Now it's bedtime before I start making sense.)

What a very Sara Palin thing to do...