It sure didn't sound like she publicly posted the personal info of any right wing artists. She would never have another event if she had....and the gallery would probably have been firebombed.
She's a liar, one who bitches and moans when her lies are exposed. I don't trust a self serving word she says, she's a proven liar.

Nazis and white power groups are bad enough that standing with them makes one my foe....like NAMBLA. Some ideologies don't deserve any help spreading their message, even though they have a right to. When you offer your soapbox and amplifier to them, you become complicit in their support for hate crimes.

Sorry, but I've seen far too much alt-right lies and misdirection to buy it, and plenty of evidence that the gallery is abusing support for free speech to support and spread racist, racist alt-right ideologies, and blatantly lying about it. Their actions prove it to me. Pro-racist mass murderer speakers at events open only to alt-right listeners and kept secret from the public = rally, not roundtable.
Alt-right IS code for Nazi or white power, their own code. I'll just call them nazis, KKK, and random white power fans.

I'm still waiting for an admission that the title and description are bullshit, lies, and right wing propaganda. Can you be that honest please?

OH, OH! I know, I know!! (raises hand as a diversion) -The context in which a question like that could be considered sensible is asking it simply to make someone who thinks that this type of waste-of-time back-and-forth media shit-box battle of liberals vs. conservatives is real, just to get a rise out of and distract someone who cares to watch it!!

ALL this, with a view to distracting you from what is actually going on, which is powerful insidious cunts turning the planet's citizens into an insane roundtable of mindless, cackling wage-slave-bots.

Or, perhaps it's a coop attempt by the U.S. of A. corporation to drive the Ukraine into the EU? The Putin pissing-contest game...Since nobody here cares a fiddler's fuck about world-game issues, it'll slip into recent history like a flea fart, and all the real trolls can go back to discussing roundtable politics as usual, and remain in their media-induced dullard's snooze....Oh and Ladies and gentlemen, ➷➷➷meet an AUTHENTIC troll.➷➷➷

Avatar: Hind-brained dogs standing against one another-Using his quality spare-time to shit and piss all over anything (in true hater form) I choose to discuss or comment about.

Ignore, my ass....

@Jinx.... Character attack? I guess so. But the guy was at a ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION.

I don't think this is just character attack. The man wants to be leader of the free world. He can't even keep his CEO to himself long enough to have a (I'll grant you fake and symbolic) conversation.

He wants to LEAD. I don't see any evidence yet that he has the ability to weigh his words and make good judgments.

If this were isolated, I'd be right with you. However, this is systemic.

In my opinion, of course. In my opinion.

>> ^chingalera:

7 civil men...ladies couldn't make it. Two Negroes though, uppity ones!? What do want, it's 63'?


You obviously missed the fact that the moderator says he is joined by 7 men, when there are only six. I was NOT referring to the all male panel. Jeez, it gets SOOO tiring having to explain everything to those who actively look for a controversy.

Thanks for that info. I changed the title to the one they used.
In reply to this comment by kir_mokum:
http://roundtable.nationaljournal.com/2012/05/th
e-inequality-speech-that-ted-wont-show-you.php

http://roundtable.nationaljournal.com/2012/05/the-inequality-speech-that-ted-wont-show-you.php

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

For true connoisseurs of terrible, this is an exquisite specimen. The hastiness of the production. The general tone of awkwardness. The complete lack of chemistry. The overt racism just casually bandied about as if they were sharing recipes. It turns out that Victoria Jackson the political pundit is (unintentionally) far funnier than she was back during her brief comedy career. I love that the woman on the left clearly does not want to be there; and how the woman in purple studied up on the issues only to realize that she was only hired to prop up Victoria Jackson. The blond on the right has no clue of how badly things are going and Victoria.... WOW... You are out of your fucking mind. TIL Holding a ukelele whilst on a political roundtable discussion show makes you look insane. Playing it doubly so. This is so awful I bet even @quantumushroom would cringe. Please make more episodes! Please!!


QM won't respond. He may be many things... racist, xenophobic, small minded, inflammatory, hateful, bigoted, intellectually inconsistent and dishonest but above all other things he's a coward.

For true connoisseurs of * terrible, this is an exquisite specimen. The hastiness of the production. The general tone of awkwardness. The complete lack of chemistry. The overt racism just casually bandied about as if they were sharing recipes. It turns out that Victoria Jackson the political pundit is (unintentionally) far funnier than she was back during her brief comedy career. I love that the woman on the left clearly does not want to be there; and how the woman in purple studied up on the issues only to realize that she was only hired to prop up Victoria Jackson. The blond on the right has no clue of how badly things are going and Victoria.... WOW... You are out of your fucking mind. TIL Holding a ukelele whilst on a political roundtable discussion show makes you look insane. Playing it doubly so. This is so awful I bet even @quantumushroom would cringe. Please make more episodes! Please!!

*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Ali-G-Religion-Roundtable

This video has been declared a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by rasch187.

Ne need to apologize. Just a little mistake. No one got an eye put out.

In reply to this comment by reiwan:
Sorry on the discuss tag fail on that one vid. I didnt see anything in the FAQ about that invocation, so I figured thats what it was for. On a side note, now that I do know wha its for, I invoked a discuss on a dupe since I dont have that priv yet. weee!

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
Sorry, but this isn't what the * discuss invocation is for. It should only be used if the video in question might be a dupe, a self-link, or in violation of Sift guidelines; not to to hold a roundtable discussion of a videos merits and/or weaknesses.

*return

Sorry on the discuss tag fail on that one vid. I didnt see anything in the FAQ about that invocation, so I figured thats what it was for. On a side note, now that I do know wha its for, I invoked a discuss on a dupe since I dont have that priv yet. weee!

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
Sorry, but this isn't what the * discuss invocation is for. It should only be used if the video in question might be a dupe, a self-link, or in violation of Sift guidelines; not to to hold a roundtable discussion of a videos merits and/or weaknesses.

*return

Sorry, but this isn't what the * discuss invocation is for. It should only be used if the video in question might be a dupe, a self-link, or in violation of Sift guidelines; not to to hold a roundtable discussion of a videos merits and/or weaknesses.

*return