Where?

In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
Hehehe. I think you know it is one of my oldies. LOL!

In reply to this comment by ant:
LOL! Fake, but nice try. Is that video on VS for me to vote?

In reply to this comment by Issykitty:

In reply to this comment by ant:
Um, are you a tiger, lion, or some wild cat? Kitties don't roar. They just hiss, meow, mew, etc.


In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
How's this: RAWR!!!

In reply to this comment by ant:
In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
ALIVE

In reply to this comment by ant:
*dead

Thanks. You have been quiet.

Hehehe. I think you know it is one of my oldies. LOL!

In reply to this comment by ant:
LOL! Fake, but nice try. Is that video on VS for me to vote?

In reply to this comment by Issykitty:

In reply to this comment by ant:
Um, are you a tiger, lion, or some wild cat? Kitties don't roar. They just hiss, meow, mew, etc.


In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
How's this: RAWR!!!

In reply to this comment by ant:
In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
ALIVE

In reply to this comment by ant:
*dead

Thanks. You have been quiet.

LOL! Fake, but nice try. Is that video on VS for me to vote?

In reply to this comment by Issykitty:

In reply to this comment by ant:
Um, are you a tiger, lion, or some wild cat? Kitties don't roar. They just hiss, meow, mew, etc.


In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
How's this: RAWR!!!

In reply to this comment by ant:
In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
ALIVE

In reply to this comment by ant:
*dead

Thanks. You have been quiet.

In reply to this comment by ant:
Um, are you a tiger, lion, or some wild cat? Kitties don't roar. They just hiss, meow, mew, etc.


In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
How's this: RAWR!!!

In reply to this comment by ant:
In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
ALIVE

In reply to this comment by ant:
*dead

Thanks. You have been quiet.

And then what happened?

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:


In reply to this comment by ant:
Um, are you a tiger, lion, or some wild cat? Kitties don't roar. They just hiss, meow, mew, etc.


In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
How's this: RAWR!!!

In reply to this comment by ant:
In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
ALIVE

In reply to this comment by ant:
*dead

Thanks. You have been quiet.

In reply to this comment by ant:
Um, are you a tiger, lion, or some wild cat? Kitties don't roar. They just hiss, meow, mew, etc.


In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
How's this: RAWR!!!

In reply to this comment by ant:
In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
ALIVE

In reply to this comment by ant:
*dead

Thanks. You have been quiet.

Um, are you a tiger, lion, or some wild cat? Kitties don't roar. They just hiss, meow, mew, etc.


In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
How's this: RAWR!!!

In reply to this comment by ant:
In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
ALIVE

In reply to this comment by ant:
*dead

Thanks. You have been quiet.

>> ^joedirt:

I totally heard a groaning. why would someone not just lay down two blocks when they are down there ignoring their surrounding?

Creepers don't actually groan, that was just a zombie in the walls. The only sound creepers make is a short hiss, followed by a very large "boom"

I mean seriously, you literally snipped out the phrase "I'm sure there will be congressional oversight", and cut off the part where I said why I thought that

Sure. You said it, but have no proof it will happen so why belabor it? As with all piles of money in Washington, that 20 billion will get misappropriated and spent on unrelated crap with only token pennies on the dollar going to BP oil damages. Every citizen must view government as the ENEMY, because history proves that eventually it will be.

I know that leftists disagree with that stance... This poll proves only Democrat zombies are big gummint fanbois... Most other folks have a healthier point of view.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/june_2010/48_see_government_today_as_a_threat_to_individual_rights

There's part of your fever dream I agree with -- namely, the rich and the powerful never get held accountable for anything.

Agreed. Guys like Barney Frank should be penniless street bums in the stocks at town square instead of still being in charge of the committee he used to screw up the economy.

Free speech zones, dissent = sedition, opposition = traitors, with us or against us…

I am not a slave to a political ideology. I don’t apologize for people when they do the wrong things. So I I freely and openly condemn(ed) the tactics the GOP used during Bush to stifle dissent. Will you do the same? Do you condemn people like Pelosi, Reed, Obama, Olbermann, Madcow, and all the others on the left who routinely mock, belittle, and censor Tea Partiers, call people “Nazis”, and the “party of No” for no reason but to grease the skids of their agenda? Thankfully, I am not bound with such fetters. Boo - hiss to 'free speech zones' no matter what party is behind them.

We need the Fairness Doctrine, badly. The rightwing dominance of the media has had a disastrous effect on our country's welfare. Rupert Murdoch has done incalculable harm, just to make a buck.

No – we don’t need any government regulation of media. The marketplace of ideas is a grand collision – and viewpoints of all kinds are available everywhere without government interference. The Right may dominate talk radio, but the left dominates most other media with an iron fist. Hollywood, CNN, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, the NYT, AP, PBS, tv shows, pop music, and the vast majority of news channels, newspapers, and internet blogs either tilt left or are outright left wing extremists.

So does your opinion of the “Fairness Doctrine” include forcing all these left wing radicals to give conservative views ‘equal time’ in all media venues? Or do you only care about talk radio because it says things you don't like sometimes? See how your support of such a concept leads only to tyranny and abuse? The whole FD concept is an attempt by neolibs to break down one of the few areas where they don't dominate. Rather than cheer it on, it should totally creep you out and outrage you.

You righties always get your panties in a wad when you can't insult broad swaths of the population with derogatory racial and sexist remarks.

No – we get annoyed when sanctimonious lefties use political correctness to stifle dissent. I don’t insult minorities or make racist/sexist comments. And yet here you are, accusing me personally of being a racist and a sexist based on no evidence. Funny how you are using Political Correctness to stifle dissent, isn’t it? Gee – it’s almost like I was EXACTLY RIGHT! Thanks for proving my point. Sadly you aren't alone. This kind of crap is commonplace from the left on campuses, in public schools, on news, in the media, in entertainment, and in politics. Ried, Pelosi, and more commentators I can count have all used the same tactic. Shame on you all.

BP committed a crime, the kind of crime that they could (and probably will) try to weasel out of with legalities.

If they commit a crime, you take them to court. You don’t have the Executive Branch create a private slush fund. If they violated the law, then punish them with the law. Don’t make up crap from the Oval Office.

>> ^Winstonfield_Pennypacker:
I tend to agree on calling the GOP out for flip-flopping on this. Obama's 20 billion cash escrow account IS a 'shakedown' and there is nothing wrong calling him out on it. The GOP should have had the stones to oppose it more. There is no legal justification for the Executive Branch to assume this kind of power. It is unconstitutional, illegal, and inappropriate. Putting unsupervised Executive branch 'czars' like Fienberg in charge of 20 billion dollars to hand out to whoever he wants is a terrible idea.
Barton was 100% correct in everything he said. It is shameful for the US to have anything to do with this kind of garbage. This is the stuff that Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, or other bananna republic dictators do. Boo - hiss on Obama for doing it, and double boo-hiss on the GOP for not giving Obama both barrels. When will the GOP get a backbone and stand up for what's constitutional rather than what is politically convenient? All it takes is one bogus whine from democrats about being 'opposed to helping Gulf victims' and they fold like cheap umbrellas. The leftist position on this issue is laughable on its face, and they knuckle under to the rhetoric every time. Bah.


Sadly, the courts now seem to be owning their elections to corporate America more and more these days (Like every other elected official.) If this is the case, soon the courts will owe their alliance to the same... and then who do we have to petition to?

I am not worried of excecutive powers here; I am worried of corporate powers. What if the spill costs 100 billion or more? The courts would probably never agree to force the oil companies to pay that amount in the name of "jobs" or "unfairness." What if it costs 200-500 billion? Who pays the legally required payments? What if the spill had been far worse?


I am not saying you are wrong---the president has no means to force a company to do right. It is the actual consumer who has that power (Consider the consumer a Veto-man.) Then, it is the courts that have that power. However, when everything fails? Then what?

Oh, and BP did this for public image--not because the president shook any one down. You give the president too much here---it was the consumer's veto that won that battle... certainly not Bp's moral standards...

I can see how you could misunderstand, because the president has blue balls and not red ones.

Ya, it is politics as its finest really. Thanks to some others providing me links and what not, I was able to fine lots of information out on this. It seems the district courts are the ones that should be handling stuff like that. Obama has the power of Moratorium, but state still have a certain level of veto power. It is all super crazy tangled web. I think most would agree with the settlement being needed, as for me, I worry like yourself about federal 'Carz' of wealth distribution. The courts are one of the last places were we as citizens can make judgments against large corporations. We do get stabbed in the back at times, like with the huge reductions in the fines for exxon; bastards. I think we need to rethink corporate charters and how they exist in this country. They are far to sheltered from the risk normal people take. I don't have a solution atm, just thinking out loud.


>> ^Winstonfield_Pennypacker:

I tend to agree on calling the GOP out for flip-flopping on this. Obama's 20 billion cash escrow account IS a 'shakedown' and there is nothing wrong calling him out on it. The GOP should have had the stones to oppose it more. There is no legal justification for the Executive Branch to assume this kind of power. It is unconstitutional, illegal, and inappropriate. Putting unsupervised Executive branch 'czars' like Fienberg in charge of 20 billion dollars to hand out to whoever he wants is a terrible idea.
Barton was 100% correct in everything he said. It is shameful for the US to have anything to do with this kind of garbage. This is the stuff that Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, or other bananna republic dictators do. Boo - hiss on Obama for doing it, and double boo-hiss on the GOP for not giving Obama both barrels. When will the GOP get a backbone and stand up for what's constitutional rather than what is politically convenient? All it takes is one bogus whine from democrats about being 'opposed to helping Gulf victims' and they fold like cheap umbrellas. The leftist position on this issue is laughable on its face, and they knuckle under to the rhetoric every time. Bah.

I tend to agree on calling the GOP out for flip-flopping on this. Obama's 20 billion cash escrow account IS a 'shakedown' and there is nothing wrong calling him out on it. The GOP should have had the stones to oppose it more. There is no legal justification for the Executive Branch to assume this kind of power. It is unconstitutional, illegal, and inappropriate. Putting unsupervised Executive branch 'czars' like Fienberg in charge of 20 billion dollars to hand out to whoever he wants is a terrible idea.

Barton was 100% correct in everything he said. It is shameful for the US to have anything to do with this kind of garbage. This is the stuff that Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, or other bananna republic dictators do. Boo - hiss on Obama for doing it, and double boo-hiss on the GOP for not giving Obama both barrels. When will the GOP get a backbone and stand up for what's constitutional rather than what is politically convenient? All it takes is one bogus whine from democrats about being 'opposed to helping Gulf victims' and they fold like cheap umbrellas. The leftist position on this issue is laughable on its face, and they knuckle under to the rhetoric every time. Bah.

Boo hiss.>> ^shuac:

I'm going to start downvoting all these Hitler Downfall vids. The first two were passably funny...passably. But now, it's not even funny in a it's-so-unfunny-it's-funny sort of way.
Nothing personal, gwiz. I'm left with no choice. This meme just won't die. Someone's got to do something.

>> ^spaceman:

CURSE YOU GRAVITY!


to this day... -takes a slow, hissing breath- gravity defies me.

Yeah. That's too bad. *ban>> ^solecist:

SELF-LINKER! BOO! HISS! ETC!