I think the camera angles, depth of field, view distance, background music, rate changes, mistakes, relatively low frame rate and especially the champagne ejaculation shot all made this quite mediocre in comparison to many of the slomo videos that are out there.

>> ^Unsung_Hero:
No, you have listed a bunch of neat stuff that could look cool in slow-motion. The point Yogi was trying to make is that the "art" portion of this video comes from unique camera angles, setup, different colors used (Primary), engaging background music, the switching of time-shifting, ect... were all carefully constructed to make this video intriguing. And that, my friend, is art.

Hehehe. Thanks, Captain Obvious. Your superpowers went to good use here.
>> ^spawnflagger:

>> ^gwiz665:
We're talking about drinking now?

So let me break it down...
a) In most states in USA, the drinking age is 21 (it used to be 18 in some states). Meaning if you are under 21, then it is illegal to consume alcoholic beverages.
b) champagne is an alcoholic beverage
c) Hayden Panettiere was born August 21, 1989, according to IMDB.
d) When someone mentions "Spitting or Swallowing", chances are they are talking about fellatio, and the eventual destination of the ejaculate - will the person performing the act spit it out, or swallow it.
e) Hayden Panettiere is an attractive female actress, and an object of sexual desire to many men.
f) champagne as featured in this video, is a metaphor for ejaculating on miss Panettiere's face and chest.
g) jimnms commented "WTF, she didn't even swallow."
h) because it is obvious that jimnms was making a sexual reference, the faux-naivety expressed in my response is humorous, because I nonchalantly answered logically with a valid reason (that she didn't want to break the law), while completely bypassing the sexual innuendo.
i) not everyone recognizes this type of humor, so they would assume that I am naive, conservative, or mentally handicapped in some way. That is a risk I was willing to take when posting the comment.

>> ^gwiz665:

We're talking about drinking now?


So let me break it down...

a) In most states in USA, the drinking age is 21 (it used to be 18 in some states). Meaning if you are under 21, then it is illegal to consume alcoholic beverages.
b) champagne is an alcoholic beverage
c) Hayden Panettiere was born August 21, 1989, according to IMDB.
d) When someone mentions "Spitting or Swallowing", chances are they are talking about fellatio, and the eventual destination of the ejaculate - will the person performing the act spit it out, or swallow it.
e) Hayden Panettiere is an attractive female actress, and an object of sexual desire to many men.
f) champagne as featured in this video, is a metaphor for ejaculating on miss Panettiere's face and chest.
g) jimnms commented "WTF, she didn't even swallow."
h) because it is obvious that jimnms was making a sexual reference, the faux-naivety expressed in my response is humorous, because I nonchalantly answered logically with a valid reason (that she didn't want to break the law), while completely bypassing the sexual innuendo.
i) not everyone recognizes this type of humor, so they would assume that I am naive, conservative, or mentally handicapped in some way. That is a risk I was willing to take when posting the comment.

>> ^undefined:

>> ^TheFreak:
>> ^Yogi:
Probably the greatest way to control people is to focus their attention elsewhere, such as huge sports spectacles and events like American Idol. In order to prevent a free society from being to democratic you have to make sure to neutralize the public, it's distraction...down to a science.

Yeah, American Idol is obviously a conspiracy. It's not a goofy show designed to appeal to the widest audience possible in order to make piles of money...it's a tool of the goverment to distract us while they...I don't know...do something...obviously something insidious...
Or maybe it IS just a TV show. I guess that makes more sense.

Hence why the brainwashing is so effective. Because people like you and her think it's just a tv show.
No harm could come to our society by becoming emotionally involved in manufactured "reality" show like this woman, right?
Meanwhile, on the rest of the planet.. Tim Geithner's shovelin' into money into the bank accounts of his friends at GoldmanSachs. BP & Haliburton are covering up all their crimes. and Blackwater's still murdering civilians and raping girls in cargo containers.
Tho you're right. It's probably just a tv show.


Oh, please. "People like you"? What a complete misrepresentation of what he said. You're free to provide evidence that this in is fact NOT just a TV show and that the only reason it exists in the first place is because it's what the viewers want to watch, however stupid it and they may be for doing so.

How people react and hinge their lives on it, and how the powers that be benefit/profit from these distractions is a completely different story. Again, unless you have evidence that these mind numbing excuses for entertainment are just a big conspiracy, in the way people on planet Earth normally define it. You might be engaging in intentional hyperbole (if so, then I apologize) but the whole situation is far more complex than the simple-minded conspiratorial ejaculate that some have left here. I see where you guys are going with this line of thought, but it's far too simplified to be taken seriously.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I think Heinlein's Razor also might be useful here.

Just gorgeous - the music, not the ejaculating rainbows.

I'm having a continuity problem with the launch and landing angles of the motorcycle ejaculate.

>> ^choggie:

how about, "fuck comment voting!"....look in a mirror or at your own dick if you want some validation for your "world of the self" disorder....or better yet, go try to have an actual conversation with like-minded or influential potentials....so you really need to look at yourself in the mirror as you masturbate?
Fucking hate, hated, hating, could care less for, , and have always hated, the widget that is, COMMENT VOTING....Most of you, if you will be real (honest) with yourselves... could give a fiddlers fuck what someone anon thinks that what you ejaculated yesterday, is clever, EVER!
I vote to banish comment voting as the schism that reeks of cancer that it is/has become, forever on this site...let yer sifting and votes speak tomes ya bunch a jiz-shooting males who have a say in your own trajectory.....use a tissue and not an old t-shirt ya buncha "never gonna breed motherfuckers!"
Don't really see, and ain't gonna, the few women that haven't been scared away from the site or hold out against all odds, chiming in here ...........Why?? Cause they are smarter than the internet, ya fuckin' buncha dick-less males.


Oh, the irony.

>> ^choggie:

how about, "fuck comment voting!"....look in a mirror or at your own dick if you want some validation for your "world of the self" disorder....or better yet, go try to have an actual conversation with like-minded or influential potentials....so you really need to look at yourself in the mirror as you masturbate?
Fucking hate, hated, hating, could care less for, , and have always hated, the widget that is, COMMENT VOTING....Most of you, if you will be real (honest) with yourselves... could give a fiddlers fuck what someone anon thinks that what you ejaculated yesterday, is clever, EVER!
I vote to banish comment voting as the schism that reeks of cancer that it is/has become, forever on this site...let yer sifting and votes speak tomes ya bunch a jiz-shooting males who have a say in your own trajectory.....use a tissue and not an old t-shirt ya buncha "never gonna breed motherfuckers!"
Don't really see, and ain't gonna, the few women that haven't been scared away from the site or hold out against all odds, chiming in here ...........Why?? Cause they are smarter than the internet, ya fuckin' buncha dick-less males.

In a short sidetrack, any idea when we can expect "ignore" to start working again? I'm getting really tired of seeing this kind of crap...

>> ^choggie:

how about, "fuck comment voting!"....look in a mirror or at your own dick if you want some validation for your "world of the self" disorder....or better yet, go try to have an actual conversation with like-minded or influential potentials....so you really need to look at yourself in the mirror as you masturbate?
Fucking hate, hated, hating, could care less for, , and have always hated, the widget that is, COMMENT VOTING....Most of you, if you will be real (honest) with yourselves... could give a fiddlers fuck what someone anon thinks that what you ejaculated yesterday, is clever, EVER!
I vote to banish comment voting as the schism that reeks of cancer that it is/has become, forever on this site...let yer sifting and votes speak tomes ya bunch a jiz-shooting males who have a say in your own trajectory.....use a tissue and not an old t-shirt ya buncha "never gonna breed motherfuckers!"
Don't really see, and ain't gonna, the few women that haven't been scared away from the site or hold out against all odds, chiming in here ...........Why?? Cause they are smarter than the internet, ya fuckin' buncha dick-less males.



Bull shit.

how about, "fuck comment voting!"....look in a mirror or at your own dick if you want some validation for your "world of the self" disorder....or better yet, go try to have an actual conversation with like-minded or influential potentials....so you really need to look at yourself in the mirror as you masturbate?
Fucking hate, hated, hating, could care less for, , and have always hated, the widget that is, COMMENT VOTING....Most of you, if you will be real (honest) with yourselves... could give a fiddlers fuck what someone anon thinks that what you ejaculated yesterday, is clever, EVER!

I vote to banish comment voting as the schism that reeks of cancer that it is/has become, forever on this site...let yer sifting and votes speak tomes ya bunch a jiz-shooting males who have a say in your own trajectory.....use a tissue and not an old t-shirt ya buncha "never gonna breed motherfuckers!"

Don't really see, and ain't gonna, the few women that haven't been scared away from the site or hold out against all odds, chiming in here ...........Why?? Cause they are smarter than the internet, ya fuckin' buncha dick-less males.

>> ^spoco2:
ARGH!
Again with this bullshit..

NO, THEY ARE NOT BANNING SMALL BREASTS. Does no one actually go and check things anymore?
sigh .
Yes, Australia has some ridiculous censorship laws. YES, the attempt to install a mandatory internet filter is utter bullshit. YES we are denied R rated games.
BUT THIS IS NOT TRUE.
It hurts the real cases when this is spread around as if it's fact, because it isn't.
The ejaculation thing is true, which absolutely friggen baffles me... WHY?


It's not bullshit. The ban applies to any porn that subjectively appears to include people under 18, by the arbitrary opinion of the censor, rather than to subjects who are actually under age. So a small-breasted and young-looking 25-year old could be banned.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

I have read it. I support the Anonymous action. The "banning small breasts" thing is actually, mostly true.

From the site that's linked from that Crikey link you posted Spoco:.

UPDATE 29/01/10 12:19PM: Fiona Patten has provided additional comment:

“I would like to clarify a few points. In the last 18 months the Classification Board has revoked over 30 serial classifications for a range of reasons, one major one being that the models appear to be under 18. These revoked classifications do not appear on the classification database.”
“Late last year I attended a classification publications training session with three adult magazine distributors and one publisher. We were shown a range of images and the notes made by the board were read out. The underdeveloped nature of the model’s breasts was cited as a reason for the image to be refused classification numerous times.“

“All the publications that have been refused classification adhere to the very strict US laws that enforce model age verification in adult publications and films. These laws are upheld by the FBI. There is no chance that any of the models were under 18.”

>> ^spoco2:
ARGH!
Again with this bullshit..

NO, THEY ARE NOT BANNING SMALL BREASTS. Does no one actually go and check things anymore?
sigh .
Yes, Australia has some ridiculous censorship laws. YES, the attempt to install a mandatory internet filter is utter bullshit. YES we are denied R rated games.
BUT THIS IS NOT TRUE.
It hurts the real cases when this is spread around as if it's fact, because it isn't.
The ejaculation thing is true, which absolutely friggen baffles me... WHY?

ARGH!

Again with this bullshit..


NO, THEY ARE NOT BANNING SMALL BREASTS. Does no one actually go and check things anymore?

*sigh*.

Yes, Australia has some ridiculous censorship laws. YES, the attempt to install a mandatory internet filter is utter bullshit. YES we are denied R rated games.

BUT THIS IS NOT TRUE.

It hurts the real cases when this is spread around as if it's fact, because it isn't.

The ejaculation thing is true, which absolutely friggen baffles me... WHY?

Celestial ejaculate.

Seriously? A ban on female ejaculation?