I need a tissue now to wipe the drool off my chin. So glad I didn't watch it in fullscreen... Upvote!

Shit, I think you're right. But I'm still sticking with the video.

In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
Is.. is that a dude? The chin says dude to me.
In reply to this comment by geo321:

Glad someone enjoyed it as much as me
In reply to this comment by blankfist:
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

In reply to this comment by KnivesOut:
I guess you're not a real republican. If you were, you'd support the troops.

Tell you what, you can support deez nuts with your chin.>> ^quantumushroom:

>> ^KnivesOut:

I was in the military, quantum dooshbag.


Yet you still missed your calling as a grenade catcher. More's the pity.

He's actually kind of creepy looking without some chin fuzz.

Singer's got one hell of a chin.

I guess you're not a real republican. If you were, you'd support the troops.

Tell you what, you can support deez nuts with your chin.>> ^quantumushroom:

>> ^KnivesOut:

I was in the military, quantum dooshbag.


Yet you still missed your calling as a grenade catcher. More's the pity.

>> ^westy:

as for the buildings falling down I think supper large buldings are pre rigged to be able to be demolished in a way that makes them fall right down.If this is true, then it explains how the twin towers fell too. It would also explain that guy's "pull it." comment. <scratches chin> If only we had a way to see if this claim was true.

>> ^blankfist:

"That's why I wanna" - Every central planning statist's sentence begins that way.

Actually, it's a common way to segue from description of a problem to a proposed solution.

My tummy is grumbling, that's why I wanna go get lunch.

My balls itch, that's why I want you to wiggle your chin.

>> ^blankfist:

As a point of information, I voted for Kerry in 2004 because I was terrified of what four more years of Bush would mean for us. I was told "if you don't vote for Kerry, you'll be throwing your vote away." The truth is, Bush won again, and sure those four years weren't ice cream and puppies, but we lived through it.

So why not stay home, if voting never matters? I'd prefer if you, and everyone who believed as you do followed that advice.

>> ^blankfist:
The point is, at some point or another we have to stop with this chicken little 'sky is falling' attitude and vote our conscience.

Well, here's the thing. Consider a game of football. Every time you take possession of the football, you want to get it into the end zone. Does that mean you should always "vote your principles", and throw passes to the end zone, no matter what? Or do you look at where you are on the field, think about the kind of defense the other team has, and come up with a play that you think will get the ball as far down field as you can?

Most people who play football, and most people who vote, think backing the play that will bring them the best result is the play to back.

I vote based on what I think will help bring about something closer to what I want than where we are. I would love to change things so all I had to do was show up each year and say "I want us to be there", and then let the process calculate the vector sum of our preferences in some more accurate manner, and give us a congress that can implement policies that line up with the result of that vector sum.

Instead it's a series of zero-sum competitions, and that's what's causing a lot of the problem.

This thread is a wonderful litmus test for the phenomenon suggested earlier- (predictable nature of homo sapient societal programming) 9 years later, and most tow the party line. Pitchforks, torches, and a mob has always been the easiest way to put to rest dissent and forgo having to think for oneself.

"Actually, what is unique is it was the first time in history that passenger jet planes were used as suicide missiles."

Whats more unique, "actually", is that for the first time in history, 2 ginormous skyscrapers designed to withstand jumbo jet crashes fell straight down into happy little piles, when struck on different levels. Hours apart. IN EXACTLY THE SAME FASHION.
That another, WTC7, did the same hours later, after having bee hit by debris-riiiiiight.

@ Psychologic-Bobby Kennedy's death was CIA-inspired, been pretty much satisfied that it was a damn pen-zip-gun pushed up into his chin, fired upwards. Not Sirhansquared. Magic bullet my ass for his brother, no explosives used in 9/11, my ass.

>> ^Deano:

Hmmm, /strokes chin in skeptical reflection mode/, has anyone verified his claims? Sounds like garbage to me...


lolpun.

Hmmm, /strokes chin in skeptical reflection mode/, has anyone verified his claims? Sounds like garbage to me...

>> ^blankfist:
@<A rel="nofollow" class=profilelink title="member since May 3rd, 2010" href="http://videosift.com/member/Lawdeedaw">Lawdeedaw, but that's my point. Your take on public schools sounds like a monolithic one-size-fits-all system. That's what it means, it seems, when people say "it takes a society" to raise the kids. But does it? I thought it took the parents. They decided to have the children; I didn't. No other person was responsible for them having their kids. On that point, I don't have children, so don't you think I should have ZERO say in how a school system is structured?
You want "good, fair and harsh" discipline for those who fail, but what about parents (or teenager students for that matter) who don't want that type of discipline? Certainly we should have individual choice how our kids are disciplined, let alone how and what we teach them. Some parents believe in corporal punishment while others do not. Should one group's wishes outweigh the next?
But a public school system is a one-size-fits-all system where the larger group's wishes outweighs the smaller group's wishes. It's always been that way. When I was in school at an early age, teachers were allowed to paddle us, and the parents had no say in the matter. Was it fair that parents and children had to accept public school paddling without any recourse at all? What if a teacher had a grudge against a kid? What if a teacher got off on spanking children? What if the teacher left bruises and welts?
The reason I believe we should get rid of public school is because it's a terrible failure. And it doesn't address the individual needs of parents and children. What if a kid knew what they wanted to be, or at least had a strong interest in some field or industry (medicine, filmmaking, etc.), wouldn't it be cool if there were schools (or tutors) that catered to that without having to teach the horrible 'no kid left behind' one-size-fits-all curriculum passed down by the Dept. of Education? I think so.


Let me give a recent example of no-responsibility members of society fucking things up for parents. My brother does not want children nor can he even stand them. I have three children, all girls 3 and under. Well, my mom got remarried and her dictate was for all the children to have fun during the reception. Fine and well.

They were having a blast. They were screaming and running as kids do, and my brother got furious. Mom was cool with it, even if her wedding had been very formal. My brother said, "If I wanted fucking screaming, I would have went to god damn Jumberee." I said, bro, calm down and watch your tounge when you speak about my kids. "No, I fucking hate kids."

Now, knowing my brother was speaking directly about all children, including my own, I almost punched his face off his chin. That would have had me in cuffs and would have certainly affected how I raise my children and how my children would have saw me. His responsibility was to not attend the wedding if he had a problem with children---or he could have shut up. Period. But since he has a responsibility-free mindset, that it is not his problem but he can interject his opinion where it is not wanted or relevant, I have to suffer.

His mindset is, “Why should I not attend my mother’s wedding because of your kids? And why should I have to put up with their screaming?” Well, you don’t raise my kids, don’t love them or care for them, so stfu bro. Mom invited me and my kids, so put up with them. If you demand they change bro, then put in some fucking effort and teach them! You cannot have it both ways.

>> ^campionidelmondo:

>> ^blankfist:
What he has isn't a beard so much as it is a goatee, right?

It's a goatee with mustache, which looks a bit more weird on him since his chin hair is grey and his mustache is still brown-ish. I say lose the 'stache and rock a grey goatee.

It's technically a Van Dyke (goatee with mustache)

See the way he curls his upper lip and tucks his chin while he's talking?

Lie to me, David

>> ^blankfist:

What he has isn't a beard so much as it is a goatee, right?


It's a goatee with mustache, which looks a bit more weird on him since his chin hair is grey and his mustache is still brown-ish. I say lose the 'stache and rock a grey goatee.