>> ^A10anis:

>> ^Fletch:
>> ^A10anis:
If you watch at the end, when he attempts to stop, you notice his feet are still moving backwards which almost makes him fall. Also, I think sparks are just discernible as he crosses pedestrian bit. These observations, coupled with the sound, make me think that he is wearing those shoes with the tiny wheels on them. My kids have them.

Or the street is wet and slippery.

HMM, Ok. I bet you believe in big foot too..

For the record, I do not believe that Bigfoot can moonwalk.

I actually like the show, not for it's content, mind you. I just like it because it's 40 minutes of facepalm, frikkin' hilarious.
But it seems like they've run out of ideas.. "Aliens and Bigfoot", really?!

I was hoping for a Bigfoot.

slowmo sounds like bigfoot hahaha

>> ^Drachen_Jager:

@Duckman33
I do, yes.
I also know who pissed in your cornflakes this morning, but I'm not telling.


Funny, I didn't eat cornflakes...

>> ^shponglefan:

So are Bigfoot, Nessie and the Roswell aliens...
>> ^rougy:
Whoever attacked America on 9/11 is still out there


9/11 was not a myth or an urban legend, but the official investigation was.


@Yogi - did you actually take the time to tell me that everybody dies? Wow. Deep.

So are Bigfoot, Nessie and the Roswell aliens...

>> ^rougy:
Whoever attacked America on 9/11 is still out there

>> ^alizarin:

I'd love to see this applied to some famous things like Zapruder JFK assassination film, the Patterson-Gimlin bigfoot film, etc.


Or the Blair Witch Project...

I'd love to see this applied to some famous things like Zapruder JFK assassination film, the Patterson-Gimlin bigfoot film, etc.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'trailer park boys, sasquatch, bigfoot, ellen page, julian' to 'trailer park boys, sasquatch, bigfoot, ellen page, julian, samsquanch' - edited by Fusionaut

**sigh**

I think that we should all be able to agree on the following...
- The human mind can become very easily confused.
- Vivid hallucinations are a well documented phenomenon.
- There are many things that can impact a persons perception; narcotics, a lack of oxygen, too much oxygen, lack of sleep, some bad pizza before bed, etc.
- Those that are in a fragile or compromised state of mind are more susceptible to certain "experiences".
- In times of stress the human mind can latch onto an idea and cling to that idea like a life raft.
- People can truly believe in what they experienced regardless of any contrary evidence.
- A person can pass a polygraph if they believe in the truth of their answers.
- Just because someone believes that they experienced something it doesn't make it so.

Why is it that if someone has an "experience" that is in any way associated with religion they are pushed forward by supporters of that religion as being validation of their beliefs but if someone has an "experience" that is associated with Elvis, Aliens, or Bigfoot they are deemed to be lunatics? How different is it really to suggest that you were visited by the omnipotent creator of the universe than it is to suggest that you were visited by an intelligent alien life form from a far off planet?

>> ^shinyblurry:

The truth: The bible contains no scientific errors.


Because it's a book about religion, not science. THAT'S why someone might say it's unscientific. The book I have on fly fishing contains no scientific errors either. Look in any cook book you might have in your house and you will find no scientific errors.

You're thinking of those religious people that try to say the bible can be proven scientifically. They're trying to put science in the bible by saying "This passage means they knew about planetary orbits" or whatever, when it just isn't true. Show me some differential equations in the bible and then you can say it's is scientific.

Also:
>> ^shinyblurry:

Atheist error #2 The bible is only confirmed by the bible, there is no outside external verification

The truth: There are over 39 sources outside of the Bible that attest to more than 100 facts regarding Jesus’ life, teachings, crucifixion, and resurrection.


Many "outside sources" confirmed that crop circles were "true". Tons of people from all over the world and different walks of life thought that scratchy old film of Bigfoot was real. The only difference between these things and the bible is that nobody revealed the hoax before they died. And people were much more gullible back then as opposed to now because the more we learn with science the more skeptical we can be about the incredible. There's more magic in the bible than there is verifiable science.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'wheres waldo, bigfoot, spoof, parody' to 'wheres waldo, bigfoot, spoof, parody, thoselilrabbits' - edited by kronosposeidon

I was going to post this yesterday but then the sift was down so it's probably too late, but I had it saved so here it goes:

I don't think people should go out of their way to take offence to these kinds of videos. It's propaganda, and it would be interesting to some, but there is nothing new or particularly insightful here. If you don't fit the description of the video, you can probably safely move along. However, it describes many people.

>> ^shinyblurry:

Isn't there something inherently stupid about telling someone they're wrong about their beliefs because "no one knows"? Well then, how would you know dummy?

Some things are unknowable. People claiming the opposite are either liars or simply mistaken. Acknowledging (knowing) that this statement is true does not cause a contradiction.

>> ^shinyblurry:

I am a highly rational and logical person...

I don't mean to pick on this (at least not in a mean way), but if this is true you must have considered the massive amount of psychological delusions that humans make on a regular basis. People believe they have been visited by aliens. Even in the modern age many people in various countries believe they are following Gods on earth and believe they've witnessed miracles conducted by those man-gods. People (even presently) believe in witches, demonic possession, voodoo, astrology, homeopathy, dowsing, bigfoot, ghosts, etc, etc, etc.

Violent crime victims have been utterly surprised and ashamed when DNA evidence proved that their sworn and BELIEVED eyewitness accounts were misremembered and that people they were POSITIVE perpetrated the crimes against them indeed did not. Some people believe God tells them directly to kill others. Or that they themselves are the Messiah.

And generally speaking, the human mind has evolved to find patterns in noise: to interpret coincidence as cause and effect.

Given all of this, what is more likely: that all of these claims and beliefs are true? Or that just the ones we agree with are true? Or that perhaps few or none of these claims are true and they reveal the fragile nature of the human mind.

If we can accept the latter explanation, that we are limited machines with limited resources processing vast information in real time under great stress over decades of experiences... perhaps when we find ourselves seeing, remembering, or believing something unsupported by physical evidence, perhaps we should logically consider that we *should not* believe it.

Back to lurking...