search results matching tag: HAL
» channel: weather
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
Videos (68) | Sift Talk (3) | Blogs (4) | Comments (120) |
Videos (68) | Sift Talk (3) | Blogs (4) | Comments (120) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
GoPro Attached to Fish
Killer eye foley!
How they go-pro get their gear back from Hal?
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) Documentary
Oh, I'm still watching, and it's interesting, but man the MIDI music is horrendous.
Also the film critics are so full of shit, my god they sound like pretentious fools.
But all the special effects and tech guys are interesting.
[edit] Ok, now I just had that female critic start talking about Dave dismantling HAL as a rape... urgh, she must be a joy at parties
carneval (Member Profile)
haha... nice!
In reply to this comment by carneval:
In the spirit of the event HAL now has a mouth.
Get Your Tongue Avatar On (Sift Talk Post)
In the spirit of the event HAL now has a mouth.
Steve Jobs vs Bill Gates. Epic Rap Battles of History
The only problem with HAL, is that, well we all know he looks like he is actually a street lamp sticking out of a Atari 2600...
I had to say it. Not fear inducing exactly.
(But, that was the point...)
Steve Jobs vs Bill Gates. Epic Rap Battles of History
I think HAL won
New Prometheus Viral: "Happy Birthday David"
>> ^Grimm:
Well, that explains it. The A/2's were always a bit twitchy.
Also, not nearly as blond, blue-eyed, and Aryan as the A/1's; I mean sure the A/2's were always twitchy and randomly killing people like HAL when programming conflicts arose, but atleast they weren't genocidal!
XCOM: Enemy Unknown first look
"My God... It's full of win..." -Frank Poole, while playing XCOM:Enemy Unknown just before HAL went psycho.
Amazing. Seems to be close to what the original could have been, with today's tech back then.
What really happens if you take off your helmet in space?
Actually 2001: A Space Odyssey got it right too where Dave Bowman was briefly in space without a suit due to that darned Hal 3000!
GREEN LANTERN Coaster Construction - Time Lapse
It's all wonderful until Hal Jordan loses concentration.
A conversation with Siri on the iPhone 4S
While the AI isn't quite HAL or GLaDOS, I'm really really impressed with the speech recognition. It seems like in 10 minutes of video there was one glitch I caught and it wasn't too bad (4 ass instead of 4s). If it can really translate speech to text this accurately, texting will be amazingly improved.
Some Thoughts on the Ape Movie (Blog Entry by dag)
Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)
But to care about SF, it has to be about how it relates to human beings. In some sense we have to put ourselves in the shoes of the people who are experiencing the wonder. Otherwise it's dry and boring.
When I think about SF movies without good character, I think of Transformers. Style over substance.
Contact on the other hand had a great central character that let you feel the wonder of what she was experiencing through her eyes. That's vital.
>> ^gorillaman:
>> ^dag:
Hmmm. Examples? I guess Dave Bowman was pretty flat, but HAL as a character definitely wasn't. Deckard in Bladerunner was not flat, very tortured nuanced performance by Harrison Ford. I think I'd have to disagree with you gorillaman. The best SF, like all stories, is character driven.
Well there's Rama, where Clarke correctly focuses on the ship. I feel like people who complain about the humans' characterisation just aren't reading the book right. I read Schild's Ladder recently - the characters have intellectual disagreements but not much else, to the point of lacking differentiated sexes, and it still paints a compelling portrait of future civilisation. I hesitate to mention Ayn Rand's Anthem, but she understood if you detail your protagonist too explicitly then you lose your universality of meaning.
It's not often an author can write SF in its purest form and still get published, so it's easier to find examples where too much emphasis on the human elements detracts from the work. Like Asimov's Foundation, one of my favorites. The characters in that book are downright intrusive on what's otherwise an exploration of events on a galactic scale. After the reader gets his introduction to the wonderful concept of psychohistory, the characters start to drive the plot and everything falls apart. The rest of the book and the subsequent books in the series become just Some Stuff That Happens. Well stuff happens every day, I don't need to read about stuff. Just like Rama's sequels, no good can come from watering down high literature with narratological cliches.
Good SF communicates to the reader a single idea as clearly and elegantly as possible then ends. Characterisation, even plot, are distractions.
It's an educational experience. How would you feel if your maths textbook gave the number two a quirky personality, and the equals sign a terrible secret to hide? That's fine if you just want to be entertained, but not if you want to learn something. I use SF as a kind of zen meditation, projecting my consciousness into a construction of a future I won't visit in person, in order to become enlightened.
Some Thoughts on the Ape Movie (Blog Entry by dag)
>> ^dag:
Hmmm. Examples? I guess Dave Bowman was pretty flat, but HAL as a character definitely wasn't. Deckard in Bladerunner was not flat, very tortured nuanced performance by Harrison Ford. I think I'd have to disagree with you gorillaman. The best SF, like all stories, is character driven.
Well there's Rama, where Clarke correctly focuses on the ship. I feel like people who complain about the humans' characterisation just aren't reading the book right. I read Schild's Ladder recently - the characters have intellectual disagreements but not much else, to the point of lacking differentiated sexes, and it still paints a compelling portrait of future civilisation. I hesitate to mention Ayn Rand's Anthem, but she understood if you detail your protagonist too explicitly then you lose your universality of meaning.
It's not often an author can write SF in its purest form and still get published, so it's easier to find examples where too much emphasis on the human elements detracts from the work. Like Asimov's Foundation, one of my favorites. The characters in that book are downright intrusive on what's otherwise an exploration of events on a galactic scale. After the reader gets his introduction to the wonderful concept of psychohistory, the characters start to drive the plot and everything falls apart. The rest of the book and the subsequent books in the series become just Some Stuff That Happens. Well stuff happens every day, I don't need to read about stuff. Just like Rama's sequels, no good can come from watering down high literature with narratological cliches.
Good SF communicates to the reader a single idea as clearly and elegantly as possible then ends. Characterisation, even plot, are distractions.
It's an educational experience. How would you feel if your maths textbook gave the number two a quirky personality, and the equals sign a terrible secret to hide? That's fine if you just want to be entertained, but not if you want to learn something. I use SF as a kind of zen meditation, projecting my consciousness into a construction of a future I won't visit in person, in order to become enlightened.
Some Thoughts on the Ape Movie (Blog Entry by dag)
Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)
Hmmm. Examples? I guess Dave Bowman was pretty flat, but HAL as a character definitely wasn't. Deckard in Bladerunner was not flat, very tortured nuanced performance by Harrison Ford. I think I'd have to disagree with you gorillaman. The best SF, like all stories, is character driven.
>> ^gorillaman:
Can't help butting in on this conversation.
The best SF has absolutely flat, generic characters. Because they're not the point of the story. Why does everything have to be a soap opera?
Hal's voice test - 2010 (1984)
Hal is my idol.