Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
7 Comments
blankfistThe old party people look none too pleased.
blankfist*promote the reasonable voice
siftbotSelf promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Saturday, June 25th, 2011 1:08pm PDT - promote requested by original submitter blankfist.
quantumushroomI like Dr. Paul, but that doesn't excuse him from having his ideas vehemently challenged
For those of you who are more annoyed by Paul than my GF Ann Coulter, she properly excoriates him in this column.
Paul can't even scratch Social Security and Medicare off that list by taking the libertarian position that there should be no Social Security or Medicare, because he also said during the debate: "We don't want to cut any of the medical benefits for children or the elderly, because we have drawn so many in and got them so dependent on the government." (And of course, those programs do exist, whether we like it or not.)
So Rep. Paul is a swashbuckling individualist when it comes to civilization's most crucial building block for raising children (marriage) but willing to be a run-of-the-mill government statist when it comes to the Ponzi-scheme entitlements bankrupting the country. He's like a vegetarian who says, "I'm not a fanatic -- I still eat meat."
Lawdeedaw>> ^blankfist:
The old party people look none too pleased.
You know this has my vote--I am watching it right now. But could you have picked a longer fucking video? I worked 16 hours in a row!
LawdeedawAnd, he seems a lot more focused in this one--he attacks the debt where it matters. It was looking like he was lost before; thanks for finding yourself Paul.
MarineGunrockWhy is this man not president?!
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.