No other info, no vote. Sorry, qruel.

Hmm, MG is right.. I googled the lady and the documentary title... this is what I got for the Documentary, torrents also came up. Ah..here we go...Google Video of the full Doc. Still...would like to see some documentation of what she claimed.

looks like we might have to find the full movie and watch the credits for sources (although didn't they show the actual text from the manuals in this clip?)

http://www.undersiegemovie.com/

http://www.undersiegemovie.com/moreinfo.html

here is more information about the broschure mentioned from the The Phoenix Federal Bureau of Investigations.
http://www.retakingamerica.com/fbi_flyer_01.html
http://www.keepandbeararms.com/newsarchives/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=2126

here is the front and back of the broschure

http://www.keepandbeararms.com/images/FBI-MCSOTerroristFlyer-Front.jpg
http://www.keepandbeararms.com/images/FBI-MCSOTerroristFlyer-Back.jpg

Here is a link with infomation about the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health passed by Bush in 2002

general
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Freedom_Commission_on_Mental_Health
skeptical
http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2006/#11
http://www.nheld.com/BTN37.htm
http://www.edaction.org/2004/082704.htm
http://www.conservativeusa.org/mentaltesting.htm
And the other sources used for the New Freedom Commission were:
http://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov/
http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/ne...eport-2004.pdf
http://psychrights.org/Articles/BMJB...creenUSpop.pdf
http://www.icspp.org/index.php?optio...41&Item id=70

I've emailed the director of the film to get him to comment on how he is trying to connect the dots with the information he has presented and to provide sources for his assertions

it seems to me that the broschure being mentioned is not the officailly sanctioned FBI take on constitutionalist (although one shoudl wonder who in the fbi field office asserted this to actually get on the flyer)

the director then connects the dots to the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (which has it's own dubious skeletons).

i personally think he's stretching to connect the two.

Great Research Qruel!

What troubles me is how when I watched this it didn't surprise me (no matter how true or not it is)

All of this kind of stuff ALWAYS makes me dubious... 98% of the time they are always stretching to make a point - like that Bush/Hitler Directive 51 video. Total bullshit.

i would think there would be enough obvious things to point out that one would not need to stretch various facts to meet a predetermined result

Hey guys, you want info on this? Don't ever tell the police any thing, ever no one was ever helped by telling the police something that involved their case. If they even touch their hand cuffs then you invoke your right to silence.

If you do this it has been known for police to release you if they know that they have no grounds for the arrest. I have no proof of this but I do know that as a trained security guard police have to do huge amounts of paper work. They better have probable cause to arrest you.

So do not proclaim anything about any thing. Don't say a word, until you get legal representation and even then let the lawyer speak for you and advise you.