The difference is probably in how things are regulated, we'll give you money to regulate yourselves, or we're paying an outside agency to do it etc etc. But its easier for the spinsters to say ZOMG OBAMA'S REGULATIN, rather than explain he's passing regulation laws they don't approve of vs. ones they like, or do little to actually regulate.

It would be interesting to see what the actual differences are. 613 vs 643 is a lot of comparing, but I imagine they can be distilled into relatively few general purpose categories.

It's never explained if Bush's 643 is over 8 years versus 613 for Odumbo's 3.5 years. We all know who spent more tax money (and uselessly).

Bush was a liberal (bailouts/scamulus) except on foreign policy. He spent like an amateur liberal, rubber-stamping everything that slipped onto his desk. We'll never know what he'd have done had there been no muslim attacks.

Really, how long is the left going to keep defending this inflamed appendix of a fraudsident? The Kenyawaiian's gift to all of us is a complete disregard for the Constitution. We are sitting out the reign of this dangerous, clueless and corrupt regime, then hopefully it's back to business.



I want you to know posts like this are not calculated to offend. Rs aren't much better right now, but I am genuinely scared shirtless for this country with the current regime of lawless clowns at the helm.

@quantumushroom, I know liberals, and let me tell you, George Bush was no liberal.

Also, did you not watch the whole thing? Reagan and H.W. Bush beat out Obama in regulation too.

What the heck does spending tax money have to do with this?

Obama is utterly disregarding the Constitution? I'd assume you loved Reagan. Show me one thing Obama did that violates the Constitution more than the Iran-Contra Affair under Reagan.

>> ^quantumushroom:

It's never explained if Bush's 643 is over 8 years versus 613 for Odumbo's 3.5 years. We all know who spent more tax money (and uselessly).
Bush was a liberal (bailouts/scamulus) except on foreign policy. He spent like an amateur liberal, rubber-stamping everything that slipped onto his desk. We'll never know what he'd have done had there been no muslim attacks.
Really, how long is the left going to keep defending this inflamed appendix of a fraudsident? The Kenyawaiian's gift to all of us is a complete disregard for the Constitution. We are sitting out the reign of this dangerous, clueless and corrupt regime, then hopefully it's back to business.


I want you to know posts like this are not calculated to offend. Rs aren't much better right now, but I am genuinely scared shirtless for this country with the current regime of lawless clowns at the helm.

Actually, he stated that the Bush figure was also over the same length of time: "how many did George Bush, I wonder, propose in the same time period in his first term?"

>> ^quantumushroom:

It's never explained if Bush's 643 is over 8 years versus 613 for Odumbo's 3.5 years. We all know who spent more tax money (and uselessly).
Bush was a liberal (bailouts/scamulus) except on foreign policy. He spent like an amateur liberal, rubber-stamping everything that slipped onto his desk. We'll never know what he'd have done had there been no muslim attacks.
Really, how long is the left going to keep defending this inflamed appendix of a fraudsident? The Kenyawaiian's gift to all of us is a complete disregard for the Constitution. We are sitting out the reign of this dangerous, clueless and corrupt regime, then hopefully it's back to business.


I want you to know posts like this are not calculated to offend. Rs aren't much better right now, but I am genuinely scared shirtless for this country with the current regime of lawless clowns at the helm.