Ask yourself if they are socialist because they are poor or poor because they are socialist. Dig some history and you'll clearly see what's the answer.

To the commentary in the summary, liberalism ain't socialism, you label-twister.

If all socialism is bad, why go to India, and not the U.K.?

Why is the only fact he uses to talk about socialized healthcare the number of MRI machines, and the fact that the wealthy of other nations come here sometimes? Why not talk about the raw health care statistics about cost, coverage, death rates, etc?

Corporate media would never, ever, manipulate facts to try to sell us on the status quo, would they?

I mean gosh, they've done such a good job with Iraq, who wouldn't blindly trust them?

Moving this video to blankfist's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

Stossel is a tool.

This is so shallow, biased, and one-sided it makes me want to puke.

When we can thump our chests and say we're better than Mexico, Haiti, or Calcutta, we're really not saying a lot.

I'll take France any day.

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by campionidelmondo.