Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
2 Comments
siftbot3 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.
NordlichReiterOf course the machines are not secure, or reliable.
There's no single point of failure in the security setting, and the posture is fucking horrendous.
The machines are not being controlled in a MAC or RBAC setup. I get the feeling that the physical security is lacking in a huge way. Corporations are being relied upon too heavily to sort this stuff out. Diebold was a joke, and still is.
These machines should be made in the United States, and the United States only. This is not some nationalistic joke. It is a United States issue, and should be solved by resources based in the United States.
I'm sure someone will say, "if you make it open source then anyone can make these machines." To which I say only certified machines approved by rigorous process will be allowed to be used in the United States votes. Some very good alternative software have come from well meaning open source communities. Multiple flavors of Linux come to mind.
I'm sure we would need to put in place some very strong punishment for fraud, while not being too tyrannical.
Here's a list of things I would start with.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.