I had to down vote due to the faulty logic used here. If anyone remembers there was at least 10 plus channels covering this. All of the major networks along with all of the cable news channels. That morning there were literally hundreds and hundreds of comments made by eyewitnesses, reporters, and so called "experts". So what they have done here is cherry picked one eyewitness account from Fox News, one expert opinion from CBS news, and one reporters comments from MSNBC out of the hundreds and hundreds of comments made that morning and show only the three that ended up being closest to what we found out later to be the truth.

I see what you mean, Grimm and I agree. But I guess that's what editing to get a point across is all about. I am intrigued by the character Jerome Hauer, though. Interesting coincidence that he took up the position of national security advisor with the National Institute of Health on Sept 10, 2001. At the same time he was a managing director with Kroll Associates. Seems like he's someone with access to security info and has done well career-wise from 9/11.

Discarding this video. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 4 days.