Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
3 Comments
NordlichReiterThat's a fucking bad situation. How can proof like that be ignored, and is it really that bad?
I mean where's the science behind all of that? There's got to be some white papers out there on the study of the effects of those chemicals on Humans or other species.
Wait, that's right, BP is a corporation. That paper probably got lost in the shuffle.
If you would like to read about Corexit 9500, follow the link below, or search google for Corexit 9500 toxic effects
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3Ar-rEVfrn5VYJ%3Almrk.org%2Fcorexit_9500_uscueg.539287.pdf+Corexit+9500+toxic+effects&hl=en&gl=us
The EPA has found that Corexit 9500 is an "Immediate (Acute) Health Hazard". See section 15 of the html. It appears that there have been no toxicology tests on the product, according to section 11. The document is fairly complicated with corporate legislative language so I am probably misinterpreting things. Read it for yourself.
TrancecoachGawker has posted a list of The Bad Guys responsible for this oil leak disaster. Here it is. Most of who you suspect. All together. With referenced accusations.
Of course, Haliburton is in the top three of the most heinous corporations in the world and they are behind this nightmare.
SlipperyPete>> ^Trancecoach:
Of course, Haliburton is in the top three of the most heinous corporations in the world and they are behind this nightmare.
Same themes, same players, over and over and over again. Reminds me of a documentary I saw last month called Gasland.
http://videosift.com/video/Gasland-An-Expos-of-US-Natural-Gas-Drilling-Practices
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.