the subliminal message @ 10:20 (ish)

another method of diffusing tension in an argument about ideas is to locate a cat.

if someone says, "no, you are stupid and i disagree," etc, you can say, "yes but hey look, a cat."

and they'll say, "wow, that is a good cat." and you'll say, "yes, i know. let's stop arguing and be friends." and it's possible they'll say, "yes okay"

it's also possible they don't like cats, but then that friendship was never going to last anyway.

MK Ultra (the program) was real, but it never actually worked.

Besides, if I subliminally messaged “obey helium” to you, even if the subliminal message worked, you’d need to know that “helium” is my code name for “send ChaosEngine money” to have any effect.

The government is clearly not innocent, but neither are they some super competent evil geniuses either.

It’s great that you want to question things, but you should always apply Occams Razor and always look for evidence to back up any outlandish claims.

I can't say I'm surprised. I think "They Live" memory's fed my bias. Here is a fascinating article about this topic, Should I kill the video? Or add fake?

https://prezi.com/cwtn53n8hkyk/subliminal-messages-in-the-commercial-1960s/

Fake?
https://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/broadcast-national-anthem-1960s-contain-subliminal-messages/

Subliminal message at 07:59

Real talk:
For God knows what reason, some of you occasionally drop me a line asking about what to study at uni: whether to follow your passions or take the safe route.

While I’m far from an authority on anything whatsoever, I would say the following: You will never be this young again. It seems silly not to follow what you truly love. (There are limits to this advice. Celebrity Studies and Twitterology are not recommended.)

The arts and the humanities aren’t the most practical of routes. Law and medicine are probably safer, that’s true. Yeah, well so is never leaving your fucking house. If it’s in your blood, it’s in your blood. We don’t get to play the life game for too long. Don’t be a silly panda and waste it. Go after what you generally love, and I wish you the very best of luck.

I can't put my finger on it, but I think this video has some kind of subliminal message with a hint of sexual innuendo, like in Fight Club where Tyler Durden inserts those couple of frames into the children's movie reel.

But now he won't be able to see the subliminal messages on billboards, or the aliens themselves.
*promote

so many subliminal messages...now i have an urge to send nudes

Subliminal word play (like a BM or an XBOX)...BMX, and subliminal background objects (the tape player like a bikes wheels, theres something else around that looks like two wheels and a chain draped between them).

The power of subliminal messaging.

That's interesting...but the jury is in on Subliminal messages, they simply do not work. What works is words and propaganda. They don't need subliminal messaging to control us, we're already docile cows gobbling up whatever they wanna throw at us. Especially on the internet where you can get a cult following going with some bullshit video and some bullshit facts, thank you 9/11 Truthers for proving that one.

I don't get how we can't make a viral video with this sort of impact that helps our own lives? I mean why can't we put something together about how the government has been driven underground in the 80s and has been waging secret Wars? Or how about right now...Obama is waging a secret war in Africa and we're just in the dark about it, how is that allowed to continue? I say we elect him and impeach him...Obama 2012!

It's blankfist.


>> ^marbles:

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
I'm convinced that @blankfist and Penn Gillette are the only living market libertarians with a properly functioning sense of humor. My apologies to Drew Carey. >> ^marbles:
Ayn? LOL Subliminal message or Freudian slip?
air-date? early 2009?
She was being a bit facetious. Not that Palin, Perry, and the rest of them don't try to position themselves as some type of libertarian, so of course a partisan talking head is going to try to pretend she's a libertarian too, especially right after her "side" got their asses handing to them in the recent election.
She was also assuming the "War would be over" (as per Obama rhetoric). How was she to know the global bankers own BOTH parties and the war machine was only getting started?
Also the question wasn't "Who do you back in 2012?", it was "Who is the leading candidate for the Republicans in 2012?"
And for once, she was spot on.



Wait, so was this joke directed at all market libertarians or just blankfist and Penn Gillette? (What's Penn's username btw?)

That's good stuff. Really. You should submit it to the Daily Show.

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

I'm convinced that @blankfist and Penn Gillette are the only living market libertarians with a properly functioning sense of humor. My apologies to Drew Carey. >> ^marbles:
Ayn? LOL Subliminal message or Freudian slip?
air-date? early 2009?
She was being a bit facetious. Not that Palin, Perry, and the rest of them don't try to position themselves as some type of libertarian, so of course a partisan talking head is going to try to pretend she's a libertarian too, especially right after her "side" got their asses handing to them in the recent election.
She was also assuming the "War would be over" (as per Obama rhetoric). How was she to know the global bankers own BOTH parties and the war machine was only getting started?
Also the question wasn't "Who do you back in 2012?", it was "Who is the leading candidate for the Republicans in 2012?"
And for once, she was spot on.




Wait, so was this joke directed at all market libertarians or just blankfist and Penn Gillette? (What's Penn's username btw?)


That's good stuff. Really. You should submit it to the Daily Show.

I'm convinced that @blankfist and Penn Gillette are the only living market libertarians with a properly functioning sense of humor. My apologies to Drew Carey. >> ^marbles:

Ayn? LOL Subliminal message or Freudian slip?
air-date? early 2009?
She was being a bit facetious. Not that Palin, Perry, and the rest of them don't try to position themselves as some type of libertarian, so of course a partisan talking head is going to try to pretend she's a libertarian too, especially right after her "side" got their asses handing to them in the recent election.
She was also assuming the "War would be over" (as per Obama rhetoric). How was she to know the global bankers own BOTH parties and the war machine was only getting started?
Also the question wasn't "Who do you back in 2012?", it was "Who is the leading candidate for the Republicans in 2012?"
And for once, she was spot on.

>> ^marbles:

Ayn? LOL Subliminal message or Freudian slip?
air-date? early 2009?
She was being a bit facetious. Not that Palin, Perry, and the rest of them don't try to position themselves as some type of libertarian, so of course a partisan talking head is going to try to pretend she's a libertarian too, especially right after her "side" got their asses handing to them in the recent election.
She was also assuming the "War would be over" (as per Obama rhetoric). How was she to know the global bankers own BOTH parties and the war machine was only getting started?
Also the question wasn't "Who do you back in 2012?", it was "Who is the leading candidate for the Republicans in 2012?"
And for once, she was spot on.


So true... could it mean a title change? I find it a little factious that she laughs at the joke about Ron Paul's age being compared to that of a dog...