>> ^Trancecoach:

Wilfred isn't MacFarlane's creation... But I haven't seen it so couldn't say if this is a rip-off or not. The idea of childhood toys coming to life isn't new... perhaps the trash-talking, dope-smoking, womanizing childhood toy come-to-life is.. but I can't be certain.>> ^Sagemind:
Well, since this move is made by Seth MacFarlane, I think he's allowed to rip off his own creations.
>> ^phyman:
WTF?! How is this not a blatant rip off of Wilfred w/ Peter Griffin's voice?




not to mention wilfred is a dog, not a childhood toy, that is only a human to elijah wood's character and also this movie isn't a wilfred rip-off.

Wilfred isn't MacFarlane's creation... But I haven't seen it so couldn't say if this is a rip-off or not. The idea of childhood toys coming to life isn't new... perhaps the trash-talking, dope-smoking, womanizing childhood toy come-to-life is.. but I can't be certain.>> ^Sagemind:

Well, since this move is made by Seth MacFarlane, I think he's allowed to rip off his own creations.
>> ^phyman:
WTF?! How is this not a blatant rip off of Wilfred w/ Peter Griffin's voice?

Well, since this move is made by Seth MacFarlane, I think he's allowed to rip off his own creations.
>> ^phyman:

WTF?! How is this not a blatant rip off of Wilfred w/ Peter Griffin's voice?

Compassion is not an either/or proposition, my friend.

(What is this conservative need to grindingly punish others? Old Testament wrath, without a soupcon of Jesus' message to be seen.)


>> ^quantumushroom:

Save "too likely" for kids with cancer. Whatever it is, sheen has it comin'.
>> ^bareboards2:
Sorry, I can't find this funny. It is way to likely to be true.
"Too soon" and "too likely" can both be comedy killers

Save "too likely" for kids with cancer. Whatever it is, sheen has it comin'.

>> ^bareboards2:

Sorry, I can't find this funny. It is way to likely to be true.
"Too soon" and "too likely" can both be comedy killers

Your video, Seth MacFarlane Explains Who Can Hear Stewie On 'Family Guy', has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Q: "Who can hear Stewie?"

Seth: "Any one where hearing him (or not) makes it funny"
Other guy: "Yes but we also go out of your way to make sure a few key characters don't"

Pretty clear answer.
>> ^v1k1n6:

He didn't really explain who could hear Stewie, he just explained who could not.

As long as it's not another Seth MacFarlane cartoon

This is it. This video represents the pinnacle of making references to things as a substitute of humor. Seth MacFarlane himself couldn't go further. We can all move on now.

>> ^GeeSussFreeK:

>> ^Stu:
"you must defend people you don't agree with, it's where you find out where your principles really are"
Dumbest statement ever made. If someone lacks the intelligence to objectively analyze a situation from a standpoint which does not bias one way or the other, then defending someone will do nothing to change your viewpoint and simply waste time. This is why half the people in the American government should not have been elected.
I usually like Penn, but this Penn Point makes him into another typical political ranter that makes him look 'looney' and in the end will make him lose a small part of his following from people who either hate these rants or don't understand what he's saying.

I don't agree with what you say, but I will die for your right to say it.


Goddammit I soo want to fucking Kill You right now!

Touche salesman>> ^GeeSussFreeK:

>> ^Stu:
"you must defend people you don't agree with, it's where you find out where your principles really are"
Dumbest statement ever made. If someone lacks the intelligence to objectively analyze a situation from a standpoint which does not bias one way or the other, then defending someone will do nothing to change your viewpoint and simply waste time. This is why half the people in the American government should not have been elected.
I usually like Penn, but this Penn Point makes him into another typical political ranter that makes him look 'looney' and in the end will make him lose a small part of his following from people who either hate these rants or don't understand what he's saying.

I don't agree with what you say, but I will die for your right to say it.

>> ^Stu:

"you must defend people you don't agree with, it's where you find out where your principles really are"
Dumbest statement ever made. If someone lacks the intelligence to objectively analyze a situation from a standpoint which does not bias one way or the other, then defending someone will do nothing to change your viewpoint and simply waste time. This is why half the people in the American government should not have been elected.
I usually like Penn, but this Penn Point makes him into another typical political ranter that makes him look 'looney' and in the end will make him lose a small part of his following from people who either hate these rants or don't understand what he's saying.


I don't agree with what you say, but I will die for your right to say it.

>> ^Winstonfield_Pennypacker:

All the studies are showing Obamacare will (A) increase costs and (B) lower quality of care while (C) reducing the number of people who get health care period.


Umm, the GAO, who's job it is to report on such things said it would save money. Other countries with similar systems have less expensive health care than the United States.

Point to one study that shows otherwise. It's easy to say, "All the studies say..." and fill in the blanks however you want but the fact is you can't back it up because it's a lie.

>> ^Xax:

Uhhhh, you lost me, Penn. And lose that stupid hand camera... what were you thinking?


No offense (which really means I have ever intention of offending), but if he "lost you", then maybe you need to watch it again and pay attention to what he says. What he said was pretty clear and makes sense. Try listening to his opinions, as the show isn't about the camera work or cinematography. I hate it when people try to undermine someone on a nonsensical point while ignoring the substance at hand. Rather than judging him on the content (what he said), which you missed because apparently you were unable to keep up or understand his point, you attack the way in which it's filmed. This is a weak way to argue.

Seth said something along the lines of: The tea party people want what is against their own self interest, making them corporate puppets. He then said, what they [the tea party] want would be good for him, as in Seth's own self interests. In saying that, while saying he disagrees with the tea party movement, he's doing exactly as he claims the tea movement is doing. Despite the fact that movement would serve his own self interest, he's disagreeing with them/against them...therefore what he is for is against his own self interests.

Get it? He's doing the same thing he claims the tea party people are doing, but calling them puppets for it. If this was Back to the Future, he'd have created a paradox and destroyed the universe.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'pen, jilette, seth, macfarlane, larry, king, point, libertarian, healthcare' to 'pen, jilette, seth, macfarlane, larry, king, point, libertarian, healthcare, penn point' - edited by MarineGunrock