No, it does not get any neater, Rama-don ain't got shit, on....
Neatorama™®

Challenge to the wiki fucks:
Do you have an entry for Neatorama wortha fuck????

Why? Not?

>> ^BenjaminFranklin2u:
I think the majority of Americans are smarter than we give them credit for. Yea they're lazy and most of them didn't vote so they got stuck with a dumbfuck president, but when some obvious and deliberate frauds start occurring I'm confident that they people will stand up....and they all have guns and know how to use them.


Alot of people that I know still think that guns kill people. They were made for that purpose yes, but they still need an operator.

They say that the purpose of the gun is to kill and that is all it does.

I say that the knife, the bludgeon, the human hands are all made to kill. Once I state that they seem to buckle in their beliefs that a gun can kill some one by itself.

These are tools of human construct, any thing can be made to kill or maim. When anti gun arguments argue that fact, I hold a picture of all of these tools mentioned above, up.

In the movie Borne Identity, Jason uses a ball point pen to kill the competition. Bring these things up to a person who says that keeping guns away from a lawful citizen is going to stop violent crime.

My point is here, of the people I have asked opinions of have given me some pretty uneducated answers.

I like my constitutional rights, "the right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed." teh 2nd - That doesn't mean be an ass about it.

And to the point of the Esteemed Mr Franklin: I do not trust the American people as a whole, because "'A person is smart.' - (K)Kay

'People are dumb, panicky,
dangerous animals. You know it.' - (J)Jay" Men In black taken from here.

Just to be clear, I think that gay coulples should have every priveledge that a straight could. I just think that the argument "I want to call it marriage too..." is of no real sigificance. You can go right ahead and call it a marriage or gay-o-rama, as long as the rights and priviledges that come with it are equal. The word is not important.

My sweet lord
Hm, my lord
Hm, my lord

I really want to see you
Really want to be with you
Really want to see you lord
But it takes so long, my lord

My sweet lord
Hm, my lord
Hm, my lord

I really want to know you
Really want to go with you
Really want to show you lord
That it wont take long, my lord (hallelujah)

My sweet lord (hallelujah)
Hm, my lord (hallelujah)
My sweet lord (hallelujah)

I really want to see you
Really want to see you
Really want to see you, lord
Really want to see you, lord
But it takes so long, my lord (hallelujah)

My sweet lord (hallelujah)
Hm, my lord (hallelujah)
My, my, my lord (hallelujah)

I really want to know you (hallelujah)
Really want to go with you (hallelujah)
Really want to show you lord (aaah)
That it wont take long, my lord (hallelujah)

Hmm (hallelujah)
My sweet lord (hallelujah)
My, my, lord (hallelujah)

Hm, my lord (hare krishna)
My, my, my lord (hare krishna)
Oh hm, my sweet lord (krishna, krishna)
Oh-uuh-uh (hare hare)

Now, I really want to see you (hare rama)
Really want to be with you (hare rama)
Really want to see you lord (aaah)
But it takes so long, my lord (hallelujah)

Hm, my lord (hallelujah)
My, my, my lord (hare krishna)
My sweet lord (hare krishna)
My sweet lord (krishna krishna)
My lord (hare hare)
Hm, hm (gurur brahma)
Hm, hm (gurur vishnu)
Hm, hm (gurur devo)
Hm, hm (maheshwara)
My sweet lord (gurur sakshaat)
My sweet lord (parabrahma)
My, my, my lord (tasmayi shree)
My, my, my, my lord (guruve namah)
My sweet lord (hare rama)

*beg -o- rama

Very funny! Upvote-a-rama.

*beg o rama

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

He will be missed. At least we won't see any more "co-authored" books with Gentry Lee- blech.

My favorite is still Rendezvous with Rama. The good news is they're making it into a movie ... finally! (I'm a bit worried about the director though- definitely not a Kubrick)

Oh god! They're BACK!

http://www.videosift.com/video/Fred-and-Sharon-visit-Shop-O-Rama-Craft-Fair

I have little to add that hasn't been said already. This is bunk.

That being said, I will probably enjoy seeing the scare-o-rama, just to see what "the man" isn't telling me.

He should have represented himself in the Source engine, looks much better than this commodore 64 visual-o-rama.

The claim that this AI existed as long ago as the fifties is preposterous and the con-artist perpetrating this elaborate sham, should have done his homework.

That being said, the singularity is coming and trans-humanism will be here within the next hundred years.

Well done nerd-o-rama. Yay nerds with a message!!!

fake-o-rama!

Yeah... Wat U Sedd!!! I got yer back, man!
In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
Thanks for the continued support, issy. We're gonna own this web site any day, so everyone better learn to play by our OUR rules pretty soon, or else.

In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
Kronos, my friend... you rule! LOL at your comment! Oh, and believe me, I did contemplate adding it to terrible channel. I may just do that in honor of Mentos I hope I don't get downvoted for encouraging self inflicted eye trauma... HA!


I wanted to commend you on your very mature and admirable response to the downvote-o-rama. You were perfectly fine standing on your own, of course, and you made a wise decision. Needless to say, that was an interesting learning experience...wouldn't you say? Oh, the drama!!!

Anyhoo, I'm sure I'll see a sift or two of yours in the top 15 really soon! You rock!

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
Couldn't they have harvested corneas from a fresh corpse, just like how it's normally done? Because isn't it unethical to deliberately blind one person to restore the sight of another? And isn't it obvious these are rhetorical questions?

After seeing this I feel like blinding myself now. If I do it please make sure that my corneas can never be donated to any member of K.I.S.S.

Still upvote, just for the WTF value. Would a "terrible" tag be appropriate? Just kidding. Paul Stanley already earned that honor today.

Thanks for the continued support, issy. We're gonna own this web site any day, so everyone better learn to play by our OUR rules pretty soon, or else.

In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
Kronos, my friend... you rule! LOL at your comment! Oh, and believe me, I did contemplate adding it to terrible channel. I may just do that in honor of Mentos I hope I don't get downvoted for encouraging self inflicted eye trauma... HA!


I wanted to commend you on your very mature and admirable response to the downvote-o-rama. You were perfectly fine standing on your own, of course, and you made a wise decision. Needless to say, that was an interesting learning experience...wouldn't you say? Oh, the drama!!!

Anyhoo, I'm sure I'll see a sift or two of yours in the top 15 really soon! You rock!

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
Couldn't they have harvested corneas from a fresh corpse, just like how it's normally done? Because isn't it unethical to deliberately blind one person to restore the sight of another? And isn't it obvious these are rhetorical questions?

After seeing this I feel like blinding myself now. If I do it please make sure that my corneas can never be donated to any member of K.I.S.S.

Still upvote, just for the WTF value. Would a "terrible" tag be appropriate? Just kidding. Paul Stanley already earned that honor today.